This article argues that Luke intends to delineate the changes of social distance between the character “centurion” and Paul throughout the voyage in Acts 27. The social location of the centurion consistently moves from outsiders towards the group “we” in the narrative. The story functions as a thought experiment for first readers to encourage them to establish trusting relations with Roman officials in times of trial. It conveys Luke’s commission to the first readers for gospel witness..
Baker, Coleman A.2011. Identity, Memory, and Narrative in Early Christianity: Peter, Paul, and Recategorization in the Book of Acts. Eugene, OR: Pickwick.
2.
Barrett, C. K.2004. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles, vol. 2. Edinburgh, UK: T&T Clark.
3.
Beard, Mary, JohnNorth, and SimonPrice. 1998. Religions of Rome, vol. 1: A History. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Bennema, Cornelis. 2014a. Encountering Jesus: Character Studies in the Gospel of John. 2nd ed. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress
5.
Bennema, Cornelis. 2014b. A Theory of Character in New Testament Narrative. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress.
6.
Brink, Laurie. 2014. Soldiers in Luke-Acts: Engaging, Contradicting and Transcending the Stereotypes, Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/362. Tübingen, Germany: Mohr Siebeck.
7.
Bruce, F. F.1988. The Book of the Acts. Revised Edition. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
8.
Carter, Warren. 2016. “Navigating the Roman Imperial World in Acts 27,”New Testament Studies62/1: 79–96.
9.
Cosgrove, Charles H.1984. “The Divine DEI in Luke-Acts: Investigations into the Lukan Understanding of God’s Providence,”Novum Testamentum26/2: 168–90.
10.
Danove, Paul L.2005. The Rhetoric of the Characterization of God, Jesus, and Jesus’ Disciples in the Gospel of Mark, Journal for the Study of the New TestamentSupplement 290. New York, N.Y.; London: T&T Clark.
11.
Darr, John A.1992. On Character Building : The Reader and the Rhetoric of Characterization in Luke-Acts. Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox Press.
12.
Darr, John A.1998. Herod the Fox: Audience Criticism and Lukan Characterization. Journal for the Study of the New TestamentSupplement 163. Sheffield, UK: Sheffield.
13.
Dicken, Frank E. and Julia A.Snyder, eds. 2016. Characters and Characterisation in Luke-Acts. Library of New Testament Studies 548. London, UK/New York, NY: Bloomsbury T&T Clark.
14.
Dodd, Brian. 1996. “Paul’s Paradigmatic ‘I’ and 1 Corinthians 6.12.”Journal for the Study of New Testament59: 39–58.
15.
Forster, E.M.1955. Aspects of the Novel. New York, NY/London, UK: A Harvest Book.
16.
Fuhrmann, Christopher J.2012. Policing the Roman Empire: Soldiers, Administration, and Public Order. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17.
Hemer, Colin J.1989. The Book of Acts in the Setting of Hellenistic History. Wissenschaftliche Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 1/49. Tübingen, Germany: Mohr Siebeck.
18.
Holladay, Carl R.2016. Acts: A Commentary. New Testament Library. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox.
19.
Jipp, Joshua W.2013. Divine Visitations and Hospitality to Strangers in Luke-Acts: An Interpretation of the Malta Episode in Acts 28:1–10. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
20.
Keener, Craig S.2015. Acts: An Exegetical Commentary: vol. 4: 24:1–28:31. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.
21.
Kyrychenko, Alexander. 2014. The Roman Army and the Expansion of the Gospel: The Role of the Centurion in Luke-Acts. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 203. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
22.
Marguerat, Daniel. 2002. The First Christian Historian: Writing the ’Acts of the Apostles.’ Society for New Testament Studies Monograph Series 121. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23.
Morgan, Teresa. 2015. Roman Faith and Christian Faith: Pistis and Fides in the Early Roman Empire and Early Churches. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
24.
Myers, Alicia D.2012. Characterising Jesus : A Rhetorical Analysis on the Fourth Gospel’s Use of Scripture in its Presentation of Jesus. Library of New Testament Studies 458. London, UK/New York, NY: Bloomsbury T&T Clark.
25.
Perry, Ben Edwin, ed. and trans. 1964. Secundus the Silent Philosopher. Philological Monographs 22. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
26.
Pervo, Richard I.2009. ACTS: A Commentary. Hermeneia. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
27.
Powell, Mark Allan. 1990. What is Narrative Criticism?Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
28.
Praeder, Susan Marie. 1984. “Acts 27:1—28:16: Sea Voyages in Ancient Literature and the Theology of Luke-Acts,”Catholic Biblical Quarterly46: 683–706.
29.
Rius-Camps, Josep and JennyRead-Heimerdinger. 2009. The Message of Acts in Codex Bezae: A Comparison with the Alexandrian Tradition, vol. 4: Acts 18.24–28.31: Rome. Library of New Testament Studies 415. London, UK: T&T Clark.
30.
Skinner, Christopher W., ed. 2013. Character and Char-acterisation in the Gospel of John. Library of New Testament Studies 461. London, UK/New York, NY: Bloomsbury T&T Clark.
31.
Smith, J.1880. The Voyage and Shipwreck of St. Paul: With Dissertations on the Life and Writings of St. Luke, and the Ships and Navigation of the Ancients. London, UK: Longmans, Green.
32.
Stanton, Greg. 2018. “Accommodation for Paul’s Entou-rage,”Novum Testamentum60: 227–46.
33.
Talbert, Charles H.2005. Reading Acts : A Literary and Theological Commentary on the Acts of the Apostles. Revised ed. Macon, GA: Smyth & Helwys Publishing.
34.
Warnecke, Heinz. 1987. Die tatsächliche Romfahrt des apostels Paulus. Stuttgarter Bibelstudien 127. Stuttgart, Germany: Katholisches Bibelwerk.
35.
Warnecke, Heinz and ThomasSchirrmacher. 1992. War Paulus wirklich auf Malta?Neuhausen/Stuttgart: Hänssler.
36.
Witherington, Ben, III. 1998. The Acts of the Apostles: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
