The biblical narrative is filled with embedded conversations. Positioning theory and conversation analysis are aids in interpreting embedded dialogues within biblical narrative. They contribute to an understanding of how shifts in position by dialogue partners also contribute to a shift in identity. In this way the story-teller enlivens the characters function within the narrative by having them attempt to create new or expanded identities for themselves. Three examples are provided that demonstrate this narrative strategy: the story of Amnon and Tamar (2 Sam 13:1–19), the diatribe by Shimei against David (2 Sam 16:5–10), and the conversation between Jethro and Moses (Exod 18:13–27).
AntakiC.WiddicombeS.. 1998. “Identity as an Achievement and as a Tool.” Pp. 1–14 in Identities in Talk, edited by AntakiC.WiddicombeS.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2.
AuldA. G.2011. I & II Samuel. Louisville, KY: Westminster/John Knox.
3.
BambergM.2004. “Positioning with Davie Hogan. Stories, Tellings, and Identities.” Pp. 135–57 in Narrative Analysis: Studying the Development of Individuals in Society, edited by DaiuteC.LightfootC.. London, UK: Sage.
4.
BambergM.GeorgakopoulouA.. 2008. “Small Stories as a New Perspective in Narrative and Identity Analysis.” Text & Talk28: 377–96.
5.
BanasJ.RainsS.. 2008. “Testing Inoculation Theory: a Meta-Analysis.” Conference Papers—National Communication Association:1–26.
6.
BerV.2008. “Moses and Jethro: Harmony and Conflict in the Interpretation of Exodus 18.” Communio Viatorum50: 147–70.
7.
BrueggemannW.1974. “On Coping with Curse: A Study of 2 Sam 16:5–14.” CBQ36: 175–92.
8.
ButlerJ.1995. “Collected and Fractured: Responses to Identities.” Pp. 439–47 in Identities, edited by AppiahK. A.GatesH. L.. Chicago: ILUniversity of Chicago Press.
9.
CarpenterE.1997. “Exodus 18: Its Structure, Style, Motifs and Function in the Book of Exodus.” Pp. 91–108 in A Biblical Itinerary: In Search of Method, Form and Content Essays in Honor of George W. Coats, edited by CarpenterE.. JSOTSup 240; Sheffield, UK: Sheffield Academic Press.
CookS. L.1999. “The Tradition of Mosaic Judges: Past Approaches and New Directions.” Pp. 286–315 in On the Way to Nineveh: Studies in Honor of George M. Landes, edited by CookS. L.WinterS. C.. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.
12.
DaviesB.HarréR.. 1990. “Positioning: The Discursive Production of Selves.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour20: 43–62.
13.
DayD.KjaerbeckS.. 2013. “Positioning” in the Conversation Analytic Approach.” Narrative Inquiry23: 16–39.
14.
GillR.1996. “Discourse Analysis: Practical Implementation.” Pp. 141–56 in Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for Psychology and the Social Sciences, edited by RichardsonJ. T. E.. Hove, UK: British Psychological Society.
15.
GrayM.1998. “Chip Off the Old Block? Rhetorical Strategy in 2 Samuel 13:7–15: The Rape of Tamar and the Humiliation of the Poor.” JSOT77: 39–54.
16.
GreensteinE. L.1999. “Jethro's Wit: An Interpretation of Wordplay in Exodus 18.” Pp. 155–71 in On the Way to Nineveh: Studies in Honor of George M. Landes, edited by CookS. L.WinterS. C.. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.
17.
HarréR., & van LangenhoveL.. 1999. “The Dynamics of Social Episodes.” Pp. 1–13 in Positioning Theory, edited by HarréR.van LangenhoveL.. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
MatthewsV. H.2010. “Conversation and Identity: Jesus and the Samaritan Woman.” BTB40: 215–26.
21.
MatthewsV. H.2008.More Than Meets the Ear: Discovering the Hidden Contexts of Old Testament Conversation. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
22.
MatthewsV. H.BenjaminD. C., “Amnon and Tamar: a Matter of Honor (2 Sam 13:1–38).” Pp. 345–72 in Crossing Boundaries and Linking Horizons: Studies in Honor of Michael C. Satour, edited by YoungG. D.ChavalasM., & AverbeckR. E.. Bethesda, MD: CDL Press.
23.
MatthewsV. H.BenjaminD. C.1993. Social World of Ancient Israel, 1250–587 bce. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.
24.
MeierS.A.1992. Speaking of Speaking: Marking Direct Discourse in the Hebrew Bible. Leiden, The Netherlands: E.J. Brill.
25.
MeyersC.2005. Exodus. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26.
PotterJ.1996. Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London, UK: Sage.
27.
SchwartzB.J.2009. “The Visit of Jethro: A Case of Chronological Displacement?” Pp. 29–48 in Mishneh Todah: Studies in Deuteronomy and Its Cultural Environment in Honor of Jeffrey H. Tigay. Winona Lake, IN; Eisenbrauns.
28.
SchudsonM.1989. “How Culture Works: Perspectives on Media Studies on the Efficacy of Symbols.” Theory & Society18: 153–80.
29.
ShilikhinaK.2013. “Multiple Voices in Ironic Discourse.” Language and Dialogue3: 186–207.
30.
TribleP.1984. Texts of Terror: Literary-Feminist Readings of Biblical Narratives. Philadelpha, PA: Fortress.
