A review of currents of change that have characterized traditional and recent interpretative models of critical gospel interpretation. The author characterizes changes that occurred up to and since the 1970s, noting how recent developments have integrated critical methods of the 19th and 20th centuries into a performance mode as in music and drama.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alter, Robert.1981. THE ART OF BIBLICAL NARRATIVE. London , UK: Basic Books.
2.
Barr, James.1976. Story and History in Biblical Theology. JOURNAL OF RELIGION56/1: 1-17.
3.
Barton, John.1988. THE CAMBRIDGE COMPANION TO BIBLICAL INTERPRETATION. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Barton, Stephen C.1999. New Testament As Performance. THE SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY52/2: 179-208.
5.
Brown, Raymond E.1997. INTRODUCTION TO THE NEW TES-AMENT. New York, NY: Doubleday.
6.
Childs, Brevard S.1997. Interpreting the Bible Amid Cultural Change, THEOLOGY TODAY54: 200-1 1.
7.
Donahue, John R.1978. Jesus as the Parable of God in the Gospel of Mark. INTERPRETATION32/4: 369-86.
8.
Fowl, Stephen E.1998. ENGAGING SCRIPTURE. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
9.
Frei, Hans.1974. THE ECLIPSE OF BIBLICAL NARRATIVE. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10.
Hurtado, Larry W.1999. New Testament Studies at the Turn of the Millennium: Questions for the Discipline. THE SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY52: 158-78.
11.
Lash Nicholas.1983. Performing the Scriptures, Interpretation through Living . Pp. 7-18 in THE NEWTESTAMENT AS PERSONAL READING, edited by Rowan Drury.Springfield, IL: Templegate.
12.
Meier, John.1999. The Present State of the "Third Quest" for the Historical Jesus, Loss and Gain. BIBLICA80: 459-87. 1991. A MARGINAL JEW: RETHINKING THE HISTORICAL JESUS. New York, NY: Doubleday.
13.
Powell, Mark Allan.1999. THE NEW TESTAMENT TODAY. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.
14.
Prior, Joseph G.1999. THE HISTORICAL CRITICAL METHOD IN CATHOLIC EXEGESIS. Rome, Italy: Gregorian University Press.
15.
Robertson, David A.1962. The Bible as Literature. Pp. 547-51 in THE INTERPRETER'S DICTIONARY OF THE BIBLE, Supplementary Volume. Nashville, TN: Abingdon.
16.
Ryken, Leland.1992. WORDS OF DELIGHT. Grand Rapids, MI : Baker.
17.
Segovia, Fernando F.1996. The Gospel at the Close of the Century: Engagement from the Diaspora. Pp. 211-16 in WHAT IS JOHN? Vol. 1: READERS AND READINGS OF THE FOURTH GOSPEL, edited by F. F. Segovia. SBL Symposium Series, 3. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.
18.
Senior, Donald.1990. THE CATHOLIC STUDY BIBLE. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
19.
Smith, D. Moody.1996. What Have I Learned about the Gospel of John? Pp. 218-35 in WHAT IS JOHN? Vol. 1: READERS AND READINGS OF THE FOURTH GOSPEL, edited by F. F. Segovia. SBL Symposium Series, 3. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.
20.
Spohn, William C.1999. GO AND DO LIKEWISE: JESUS AND ETHICS. New York, NY: Continuum/Cassels .
21.
Stibbe, Mark, W. G.1994. JOHN'S GOSPEL. London, UK: Routledge.
22.
Talbert, Charles H.1986. Review of J. Fitzmyer's LUKE. CATHOLIC BIBLICAL QUARTERLY48: 336-38.
23.
Thompson, William M.1996. THE STRUGGLE FOR THEOLOGY'S SOUL. New York, NY: Crossroad.
24.
Tracy, David.1988. PLURALITY AND AMBIGUITY. London, UK : SCM Press. 1981. THE ANALOGICAL IMAGINATION. London, UK: SCM Press.
25.
Watson, Francis.1995. A Response to Christopher Rowland. THE SCOTTISH JOURNAL OF THEOLOGY45: 518-22.
26.
Wright, N.T.1996. JESUS AND THE VICTORY OF GOD. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress. 1992. THE NEW TESTAMENT AND THE PEOPLE OF GOD. Minneapolis, MN : Fortress.
27.
Young, Frances.1990. THE ART OF PERFORMANCE. London, UK: Darton, Longman & Todd.
