Romans 12:1–15:13 comprises a recognizable unit in the letter. But existing attempts to describe its distinctiveness focus upon concepts of “ethics” and “paraenesis” which are problematic in a number of respects. This study proposes a new manner of characterizing this section of Romans that integrates social identity theory with notions of the good life and the virtues derived from Aristotle that have staged a powerful resurgence in recent ethical discourse. This integrated approach is then applied to Romans 12:1–15:13 in a general way. From this discussion it emerges that this part of the letter can be interpreted both as Paul's attempt to outline descriptors of the new identity his addressees experience as members of the Christ-movement, especially in relation to agape, and as a vision of the moral life very similar to the Aristotelian interest in the virtues as the means to promote human flourishing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1958. Modem Moral Philosophy, PHILOSOPHY 33: 1–19 (Reprinted in her COLLECTED PHILOSOPHICAL PAPERS, Volume III. Oxford, UK: Blackwells, 1981).
2.
Barton, John1998) ETHICS AND THE OLD TESTAMENT. London, UK: SCM Press.
3.
1999. Virtue in the Bible, STUDIES IN CHRISTIAN ETHICS12:12–22.
4.
Barton, Stephen C.2001. The Epistles and Christian Ethics. Pp. 63–73 in Robin Gill, ed., THE CAMBRIDGE COMPANION TO CHRISTIAN ETHICS. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Beauchamp, Tom L. 1982. PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS: AN INTRODUCTION TO MORAL PHILOSOPHY. New York, NY et alibi: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
6.
Betz, Hans Dieter1979. GALATIANS. HERMENEIA COMMENTARY. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press.
7.
Black, Matthew1973. ROMANS NEW CENTURY BIBLE. London, UK: Oliphants.
8.
Brown, Rupert2000. GROUP PROCESSES: DYNAMICS WITHIN AND BETWEEN GROUPS. 2nd edition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
9.
Cahill, Lisa Sowle1990. The New Testament and Ethics: Communities of Social Change, INTERPRETATION44: 383–95.
10.
Dibelius, Martin.1976. JAMES: A COMMENTARY ON THE EPISTLE OF JAMES. Revised by Heinrich Greeven. ET of the 11th, revised edition of DER BRIEF DES JACOBUS by Michael A. Williams. HERMENEIA COMMENTARY. Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press.
11.
1937. A FRESH APPROACH TO THE NEW TESTAMENT AND EARLY CHRISTIAN LITERATURE. London: Ivor Nicholson and Watson Ltd.
12.
1934. FROM TRADITION TO GOSPEL. ET of second German edition of DIE FORMGESCHICHTE DES EVANGELIUMS by Bertram Lee Woolf. London: Ivor Nicholson and Watson, Ltd.
13.
1930. Das christliche Leben Eph. 4, 17–6, 9., THBL9: Col. 342.
14.
Dodd, C. H.1932. THE EPISTLE OF PAUL TO THE ROMANS The Moffatt New Testament Commentary. London, UK: Hodder & Stoughton.
15.
Donfried, Karl P.1991. False Presuppositions in the Study of Romans. Pp. 102–25 in THE ROMANS DEBATE, edited by Karl E Donfried. Revised edition. Edinburgh, UK: T & T Clark.
16.
Engberg-Pedersen, Troels, 2000. PAUL AND THE STOICS. Edinburgh, UK: T & T Clark.
17.
Esler, Philip F. 2003/4. Paul and Stoicism: A Reply to Troels Engberg-Pedersen, unpublished paper.
18.
2003 [forthcoming]. CONFLICT AND IDENTITY IN ROMANS. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
19.
1998. GALATIANS. London and New York: Routledge.
20.
Fiore, B. 1992. Parenesis and Protreptic, ANCHOR BIBLE DICTIONARY V: 162–65.
21.
Furnish, Victor Paul.1968. THEOLOGY AND ETHICS IN PAUL. Nashville, TN/New York, NY: Abingdon Press.
22.
Fitzmyer, Joseph A.1993. ROMANS: A NEW TRANSLATION WITH INTRODUCTION AND COMMENTARY. ANCHOR BIBLE, volume 33. New York, NY: Doubleday.
23.
Geertz, Clifford.1973. Ethos, Worldview and the Analysis of Sacred Symbols. Pp. 126–41 in THE INTERPRETATION OF CULTURES, edited by Clifford Geertz.New York, NY: Basic Books.
24.
Gill, Robin, ed. 2001. THE CAMBRIDGE COMPANION TO CHRISTIAN ETHICS. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Hauerwas, Stanley.1981. A COMMUNITY OF CHARACTER: TOWARD A CONSTRUCTIVE CHRISTIAN SOCIAL ETHIC. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
26.
1976. VISION AND VIRTUE: ESSAYS IN CHRISTIAN ETHICAL REFLECTION. Notre Dame, IN: Fides Publishers.
27.
Hauerwas, Stanley, & William H. Willimon. 1989. RESIDENT ALIENS: LIFE IN THE CHRISTIAN COLONY. Nashville, TN: Augsburg Press.
28.
Hays, Richard B.1996. THE MORAL VISION OF THE NEW TESTAMENT: COMMUNITY, CROSS, NEW CREATION: A CONTEMPORARY INTRODUCTION TO NEW TESTAMENT ETHICS. Edinburgh, UK: T & T Clark.
29.
Hogg, Michael A., & Dominic Abrams. 1988. SOCIAL IDENTIFICATIONS: A SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF INTERGROUP RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES. London, UK/New York, NY: Routledge.
30.
Houlden, J. L.1973. ETHICS AND THE NEW TESTAMENT. London/ Oxford, UK: Mowbrays.
31.
Hursthouse, Rosalind.1999. ON VIRTUE ETHICS. Oxford, UK/New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
32.
Käsemann, Ernst. 1980. COMMENTARY ON ROMANS Translated and edited by Geoffrey W. Bromley. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans.
33.
Kotva, Joseph J. Jr.1996. THE CHRISTIAN CASE FOR VIRTUE ETHICS. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
34.
MacIntyre, Alasdair1981. AFTER VIRTUE: A STUDY IN MORAL THEORY. London, UK: Duckworth.
35.
Malherbe, Abraham J.1986. MORAL EXHORTATION: A GRECO-ROMANS SOURCEBOOK. LIBRARY OF EARLY CHRISTIANITY. Philadelphia, PA: The Westminster Press.
36.
Matera, Frank J.1996. NEW TESTAMENT ETHICS. Lousiville, KY: Westminster John Knox.
37.
Meeks, Wayne E.1993. THE ORIGINS OF CHRISTIAN MORALITY: THE FIRST TWO CENTURIES. New Haven, CT/London, UK: Yale University Press.
38.
1986. THE MORAL WORLD OF THE FIRST CHRISTIANS. LIBRARY OF EARLY CHRISTIANITY, edited by Wayne A. Meeks. Philadelphia, PA: The Westminster Press.
39.
Meilaender, Gilbert C.1984. THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF VIRTUE. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
40.
Miller, James C.2000. THE OBEDIENCE OF FAITH, THE ESCHATOLOGICAL PEOPLE OF GOD, AND THE PURPOSE OF ROMANS. SBL Dissertation Series, 177. Atlanta, GA: Society of Biblical Literature.
41.
Moo, Douglas J.1996. THE EPISTLE TO THE ROMANS. The New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids, MI/Cambridge, UK: William. B. Eerdmans.
42.
Mumsford, Stephen.1996. DISPOSITIONS. Oxford, UK/New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
43.
Robinson, Peter, ed. 1996. SOCIAL GROUPS AND IDENTITIES: DEVELOPING THE LEGACY OF HENRI TAJFEL. Oxford, UK: Butterworth Heinnemann.
44.
Ryle, Gilbert.1990 [1949]. THE CONCEPT OF MIND. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
45.
Sampley, J. P.1991. WALKING BETWEEN THE TIMES: PAUL'S MORAL REASONING. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
46.
Sanders, J. T.1975. ETHICS IN THE NEW TESTAMENT. London, UK: SCM Press.
47.
Schmithals, Walter.1988. DER RÖMERBRIEF: EIN COMMENTAR. Gütersloh, Germany: Gütersloher Verlagshaus Gerd Mohn.
48.
Schnackenburg, Rudolf.1965. THE MORAL TEACHING OF THE NEW TESTAMENT. New York, NY: Herder & Herder.
49.
Schrage, Wolfgang.1988. THE ETHICS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT. Translated from the 1982 German text by David E. Green. Edinburgh, UK: T & T Clark.
50.
Schütz, J. H.1976. Ethos of Early Christianity. Pp. 289–93 in THE INTERPRETER'S DICTIONARY OF THE BIBLE: AN ILLUSTRATED ENCYCLOPEDIA, Supplementary Volume. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.
51.
Sherif, M., & C. W. Sherif. 1969. SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
52.
Smiga, G.1991. Romans 12:1–2 and 15:30–32 and the Occasion of the Letter to the Romans, CATHOLIC BIBLICAL QUARTERLY53: 257–73.
53.
Solomon, Robert C.1992. ETHICS AND EXCELLENCE: COOPERATION AND INTEGRITY IN BUSINESS. Oxford, UK/New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
54.
Striker, Gisela1996. Greek Ethics and Moral Theory. Pp. 169–82 in ESSAYS ON HELLENISTIC EPISTEMOLOGY AND ETHICS, edited by Gisela Striker.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
55.
Tajfel, Henri1981. HUMAN GROUPS AND SOCIAL CATEGORIES: STUDIES IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
56.
(ed.) 1978. DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN SOCIAL GROUPS: STUDIES IN THE SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF INTERGROUP RELATIONS. London, UK et alibi: Academic Press.
57.
1972. La catégorisation sociale. Pp. 272–302 in INTRODUCTION À LA PSYCHOLOGIE SOCIALE, Vol. 1, edited by S. Moscovici.Paris, France: Larousse.
58.
Turner, John C, with Michael A. Hogg, Penelope J. Oakes, Stephen D. Reicher, and Margaret S. Wetherell.1987. REDISCOVERING THE SOCIAL GROUP: A SELF-CATEGORIZATION THEORY. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Vogels, Henricus Iosephus, ed. 1966. AMBROSIASTRI QUI DICITUR COMMENTARIUS IN EPISTULAS PAULINAS. Pars Prima: IN EPISTULAM AD ROMANOS. CSEL, Volume 86. Vienna, Austria: Hoelder-Pichler-Temsky.
61.
Wetherell, Margaret.1996. Constructing Social Identities: The Individual/Social Binary in Henri Tajfelapos;s Social Psychology. Pp. 269–84 in SOCIAL GROUPS AND IDENTITIES: DEVELOPING THE LEGACY OF HENRI TAJFEL, edited by Peter Robinson.Oxford, UK: Butterworth Heinnemann.
62.
Wilson, Walter T.1991. LOVE WITHOUT PRETENSE: ROMANS 12.9–21 AND HELLENISTIC-JEWISH WISDOM LITERATURE, WISSENSCHAFTLICHE UNTERSUCHUNGEN ZUM NEUEN TESTAMENT Series 2, vol 2. Tübingen, Germany: J. C. B. Mohr Paul Siebeck.
63.
Yinger, Kent L.1998. Romans 12:14–21 and Nonretaliation in Second Temple Judaism: Addressing Persecution Within the Community, CATHOLIC BIBLICAL QUARTERLY60: 74–96.
