Exemplars' Experience of Self-Managing Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract

The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore the experience of learning self-management among women with type 2 diabetes. The 17 study participants were nominated as exemplars of self-management by diabetes experts. Data were generated from four structured focus groups, clinic records of participants, and investigator field notes. Using the constant comparative method of analysis , data were examined for patterns and themes. Analysis revealed that participants moved through three distinct phases of learning to manage diabetes. Movement through phases was heralded by identifiable transitional events. The three phases — management-as-rules, management-as-work, and management-as-living — are described as a model by which healthcare practitioners and educators can better understand the socioclinical aspects in self-management of type 2 diabetes.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl . J Med 1993;329(14):977-86.

Haas LB Chronic complications of diabetes mellitus. Nurs Clin North Am 1993;28(1):71-85.

Glasgow RE , Osteen VL Evaluating diabetes education. Diabetes Care 1992:15(10):1423-32.

Ary DV Toobert D. , Wilson W. , Glasgow RE Patient perspective on factors contributing to nonadherence to diabetes regimen . Diabetes Care 1986;9: 168-72.

Anderson RM , Nowacek G. Richards F. Influencing the personal meaning of diabetes: research and practice . Diabetes Educ 1989;14(4):297-302.

Hernandez C. The experience of living with insulin-dependent diabetes: lessons for the diabetes educator. Diabetes Educ 1995;21(1):33-37.

Linn MW , Linn BS , Skyler JS , Harris R. The importance of self-assessed health in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 1980:3(5):599-606.

Holmes GE Social work research and the empowerment paradigm. In: Saleebey D , ed. The strengths perspective in social work practice. New York: Longman, 1992: 158-68.

Rappaport J. Research methods and the empowerment social agenda. In: Tolan P. Keys C. Chertok F , Jason L. eds. Researching community psychology . Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1990.

10.

Price MJ An experiential model of learning diabetes self-management. Qual Health Res 1993;3:29-54.

11.

Leventhal H. Meyer D. Straus A. Self-regulation and the mechanisms for symptom appraisal. In: Mechanic D. ed. Psychological epidemiology . New York: Neale Watson Academic Press. 1980:55-86.

12.

O'Connell KA Hamera E. Schortherde A. Guthrie D. Symptom beliefs and actual blood glucose in type II diabetes. Res Nurs Health 1990;13:145-51.

13.

Lundman B. Asplund K. Norherg A. Living with diabetes: perceptions of well-being. Res Nurs Health 1990;13:233-62.

14.

Fontana A. Frey JH Interviewing: the art of science. In: Denzin N. Lincoln Y. eds. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks. Calif: Sage Publications. 1994:361-76.

15.

Janesick VJ The dance of qualitative research design. In: Denzin N. Lincoln Y , eds. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks. Calif : Sage Publications. 1994:209-19.

16.

Morse JM The significance of saturation. Qual Health Res 1995;5(2): 147-49.

17.

Kreuger RA The future of focus groups. Qual Health Res 1995;5(4): 524-30.

18.

Strauss A. Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park. Calif : Sage Publications, 1994.

19.

Huberman AM Miles M. Data management and analysis methods. In: Denzin N. Lincoln Y. eds. Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, Calif : Sage Publications. 1994:428-32.

20.

McWilliam C. Stewart M. Brown J. Desai K. Coderre P. Creating health with chronic illness. Adv Nurs Sci 1996;18(3):1-15.