Interviews were conducted to elicit information about coping strategies and emotional outcome among 20 adults with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Coping strategies were identified and related to emotional outcome and metabolic control. When the most prominent strategy for each individual was considered, five patterns emerged: expertise, active routinization, passive routinization, ambiguity, and emotion-based action. Coping strategies and their metabolic and emotional outcomes were interrelated in a complex way. The best emotional and metabolic outcomes were associated with problem-solving based on self-monitoring of blood glucose and sensitivity to body sensations, along with logical reasoning from factual and experiential knowledge.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Antonovsky A.Unraveling the mystery of health. How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc. Publishers, 1987.
2.
Lazarus RS, Folkman S.Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer Publishing Company, 1984.
3.
Folkman S.Personal control and stress and coping processes: a theoretical analysis. J Pers Soc Psychol1984;4:839-52.
4.
Pearlin LI, Schooler C.The structure of coping. J Health Soc Behav1978:19:2-21.
5.
Felton BJ, Revenson TACoping with chronic illness: a study of illness controllability and the influence of coping strategies on psychological adjustment. J Consult Clin Psychol1984;52:343-53.
6.
Folkman S., Lazarus RSCoping as a mediator of emotion. J Pers Soc Psychol1988;54:466-75.
7.
DeLongis A., Folkman S., Lazarus RSThe impact of darly stress on health and mood: psychological and social resources as mediators. J Pers Soc Psychol1988;54:486-95.
8.
Folkman S., Lazarus RSAn analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. J Health Soc Behav1980;21:219-39.
9.
Sanders K., Mills J., Martin Fir, et al. Emotional attitudes in adult insulin-dependent diabetics. J Psychosom Res1975;19:241-45.
10.
McFarland K. , Schell B., McCullough T.Helping diabetic patients avoid guilt when "out of control." Postgrad Med1989;85:243-48.
11.
Lundman B., Asplund K., Norberg A.Living with diabetes. Perceptions of well-being. Res Nurs Health1990;13:255-62.
12.
Johnson SBPsychosocial factors in juvenile diabetes: a review. J Behav Med1980;3:96-116.
13.
Dunn SM, Turtle JRCoping strategies in diabetes. Proceedings, American Diabetes Association. Diabetes1984;33(suppl 1):97.
14.
MacRae HDThe person and diabetes in psychosocial context. Diabetes Care1986;9:194-206.
15.
Rodin GMPsychosocial aspects of diabetes mellitus. Can J Psychiatry1983;28:219-23.
16.
Ternulf NK, Lithner F., Norberg A.Experience of being diabetic. "It is up to oneself to manage." Scand J Caring Sciences1987;1:59-67.
17.
Cassileth BR , Lusk EJ, Strouse TB, et al. Psychosocial status in chronic illness. A comparative analysis of six diagnostic groups. N Engl J Med1984; 11:506-11.
18.
Kaplan SHPatient reports of health status as predictors of physiologic health measures in chronic disease. J Chronical Dis1987;40(suppl 1):27S-35S.
19.
Lockington TJ, Farrant S., Meadows KA, et al. Knowledge profile and control in diabetic patients. Diabetic Med1988;5:381-86.
20.
Surawy C.Knowledge about diabetes in type 1 patients is related to metabolic control . Diabetic Med1989;6:784-86.
21.
Colwell JA, Dudley JD, McDonald JM, et al. Self-monitoring of blood-glucose. Consensus statement. Diabetes Care1990;13(suppl 1): 41-46.
22.
Small M., MacRury S., Boal A.Comparison of conventional twice daily subcutaneous insulin administration and a multiple injection regimen (using the NovoPen™) in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res1988;8:85-89.
23.
Reichard P.Intensified conventional treatment in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) — long-term feasibility, effects and side effects [Dissertation] . Stockholm, Sweden: The Karolinska Institute, 1990.
24.
Lundman B., Asplund K., Norberg A.Tedium among patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Adv Nurs1988;13:23-31.
25.
Ternulf NKPatients' experiences in the self-management of diabetes mellitus. Walking a fine line. Medical Dissertations New Series No 188. Umeå, Sweden: Umeå University, 1990 .
26.
Jenny J.A compliance model for diabetic instruction. Rehabil Lit1983;44:258-63.
27.
Glaser BGTheoretical sensitivity. Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, Calif: The Sociology Press, 1978.
28.
Roberts JG, Browne G., Streiner D., et al. Analyses of coping responses and adjustment: stability of conclusions . Nurs Res1987;36:94-97.
29.
Alberti Kgmm, Worth R., Home PD, et al. Home blood glucose monitoring: does it improve diabetic control per se? In: Peterson CM, ed. Diabetes management in the '80s. The role of home blood glucose monitoring and new insulin delivery systems. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1980.
30.
Dunn SMReactions to educational techniques: coping strategies for diabetes and learning . Diabetic Med1986;3:419-29.
31.
Andersson RM , Genthner RW, Alogna M.Diabetic patient education: from philosophy to delivery. Diabetes Educ1982;8:265-75.
32.
Kaplan RM, Bush JW, Berry CCHealth status: types of validity and the index of well-being. Health Serv Res1976;Winter:478-507.
33.
Jacobson AM , Adler AG, Wolfsdorf JI, et al. Psychological characteristics of adults with IDDM. Companson of diabeucs in poor and good glycemic control. Diabetes Care1990;13:375-81.
