The purpose of the study was to explore patient perspectives on socioeconomic barriers related to diabetes self-management and interventions to address these barriers.
Methods
Focus groups (n = 8) were conducted with a diverse sample of adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D; n = 53). Researchers used a semistructured moderator guide; focus groups were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Researchers employed the constant comparison method for qualitative content analysis and utilized Atlas.ti (Version 8.1.1) to digitalize the analytic process.
Results
Findings revealed 3 primary themes: (1) Existing food and nutrition resources are insufficient to support healthy eating for diabetes; (2) healthy eating is critical for diabetes management, but socioeconomic circumstances make doing so challenging; and (3) participants supported several broad categories of preferred intervention strategies. First, they endorsed lifestyle intervention informed by socioeconomic status (SES; eg, focusing on food resource management, sensitive health coaching and nutritional counseling). Next, they expressed enthusiasm for group-based learning opportunities, such as cooking classes and support groups with similar SES peers. Finally, they suggested healthy food access resources.
Conclusions
Participant suggestions should be incorporated into intervention development. Ultimately, these interventional strategies should be tested and refined to help improve health for individuals with type 2 diabetes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Statistics Report 2020 - Estimates of Diabetes and Its Burden in the United States. 2020.
2.
RabiDMEdwardsALSouthernDA, et al. Association of socio-economic status with diabetes prevalence and utilization of diabetes care services. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:1-7. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-6-124
3.
BecklesGLChouCF. Disparities in the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes — United States, 1999–2002 and 2011–2014. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(45):1265-1269. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6545a4
4.
GaskinDJThorpeRJMcGintyEE, et al. Disparities in diabetes: the nexus of race, poverty, and place. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(11):2147-2155. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301420
5.
BerkowitzSAKalkhoranSEdwardsSTEssienURBaggettTP. Unstable housing and diabetes-related emergency department visits and hospitalization: a nationally representative study of safety-net clinic patients. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(5):933-939. doi:10.2337/dc17-1812
6.
Gonzalez-ZacariasAAMavarez-MartinezAArias-MoralesCEStoiceaNRogersB. Impact of demographic, socioeconomic, and psychological factors on glycemic self-management in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Front Public Heal. 2016;4:1-8. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2016.00195
7.
HouleJLauzier-JobinFBeaulieuMD, et al. Socioeconomic status and glycemic control in adult patients with type 2 diabetes: a mediation analysis. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2016;4(1):8-10. doi:10.1136/bmjdrc-2015-000184
8.
ZgiborJCSongerTJ. External barriers to diabetes care: addressing personal and health systems issues. Diabetes Spectr. 2001;14(1):23-28. doi:10.2337/diaspect.14.1.23
9.
US Department of Health and Human Services. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Healthy People 2030. https://health.gov/healthypeople (accessed 18 February 2021).
10.
SeligmanHKSmithMRosenmossSMarshallMBWaxmanE. Comprehensive diabetes self-management support from food banks: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(9):1227-1234. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2018.304528
11.
SeligmanHKLylesCMarshallMB, et al. A pilot food bank intervention featuring diabetes-appropriate food improved glycemic control among clients in three states. Health Aff. 2015;34(11):1956-1963. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0641
12.
BerkowitzSATerranovaJRandallLCranstonKWatersDBHsuJ. Association between receipt of a medically tailored meal program and health care use. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(6):786-793. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0198
13.
BryceRGuajardoCIlarrazaD, et al. Participation in a farmers’ market fruit and vegetable prescription program at a federally qualified health center improves hemoglobin A1C in low income uncontrolled diabetics. Prev Med Reports. 2017;7:176-179. doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.06.006
14.
NelsonKTaylorLSilvermanJ, et al. Community health worker self-management support intervention among low-income adults with diabetes. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010;14(3):160344. doi:10.5888/pcd14.160344
15.
BerkowitzSAHulbergACStandishSReznorGAtlasSJ. Improving chronic cardiometabolic disease management by addresing basic resource needs: a pragmatic evaulation. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(2):139-148. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.7691
16.
NicholasLH. Can food stamps help to reduce medicare spending on diabetes?Econ Hum Biol. 2011;9(1):1-13. doi:10.1016/j.ehb.2010.10.003
17.
YoungKKaminsteinDOlivosA, et al. Patient involvement in medical research: what patients and physicians learn from each other. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2019;14(1):1-7. doi:10.1186/s13023-018-0969-1
18.
WittemanHODansokhoSCColquhounH, et al. User-centered design and the development of patient decision aids: protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1-8. doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-11
19.
DugasMTrottierMÈChipenda DansokhoS, et al. Involving members of vulnerable populations in the development of patient decision aids: a mixed methods sequential explanatory study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017;17(1):1-11. doi:10.1186/s12911-016-0399-8
20.
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. The Value of Engagement. 2018.
21.
DaviesMJD’AlessioDAFradkinJ, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European association for the study of diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2018;41(12): 2669-2701. doi:10.2337/dci18-0033
22.
SekhonMCartwrightMFrancisJJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):1-13. doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8
23.
MurphyALGardnerDM. Pilot testing the theoreticalframework of acceptability in a process evaluation of a community pharmacy–based men’s mental health promotion program. SAGE Open. 2019;9(4). doi:10.1177/2158244019885129
24.
KioskliK. Validating the theoretical framework of acceptability in complex interventions to long-term condition patients. Paper presented at: International Society of Critical Health Psychology 10th Biennial Conference; 2017.
RoulstonKSheltonS. Reconceptualizing bias in teaching qualitative research methods. Qual Inq. 2015;21(4):332-342. doi:10.1177/1077800414563803
27.
AyrtonR. The micro-dynamics of power and performance in focus groups: an example from discussions on national identity with the South Sudanese diaspora in the UK. Qual Res. 2019;19(3):323-339. doi:10.1177/1468794118757102
28.
BerkowitzSAEisenstatSABarnardLSWexlerDJ. Multidisciplinary coordinated care for type 2 diabetes: a qualitative analysis of patient perspectives. Prim Care Diabetes. 2018;12(3):218-223. doi:10.1016/j.pcd.2018.01.005
29.
SeligmanHKSchillingerD. Hunger and socioeconomic disparities in chronic disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(1):6-9. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1000072
30.
SolarOIrwinA. A Conceptual Framework for Action on the Social Determinants of Health. WHO; 2010. doi:ISBN 978 92 4 150085 2
31.
SaldañaJ. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 2nd ed.Sage Publications; 2012.
32.
CarterSLittleM. Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: epistomologies, methodologies, and methods in qualitative reearch. Qual Health Res. 2007;17(10):1316-1328.
33.
CreswellJW. Research design. Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 2nd ed.Sage Publications; 2003.
34.
BaxterPJackS. Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers. Qual Rep. 2008;13(4):544-559.
35.
BisogniCJastranMSeligsonMThompsonA. How people interpret healthy eating: contributions of qualitative research. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2012;44(4):282-301. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2011.11.009
36.
TracySJ. Qualitative quality: eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qual Inq. 2010;16(10):837-851. doi:10.1177/1077800410383121
37.
SmithCMortonLW. Rural food deserts: low-income perspectives on food access in Minnesota and Iowa. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2009;41(3):176-187. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2008.06.008
38.
BrelandJYMcAndrewLMGrossRLLeventhalHHorowitzCR. Challenges to healthy eating for people with diabetes in a low-income, minority neighborhood. Diabetes Care. 2013; 36(10):2895-2901. doi:10.2337/dc12-1632
39.
OrzechKMVivianJHuebner TorresCArminJShawSJ. Diet and exercise adherence and practices among medically underserved patients with chronic disease: variation across four ethnic groups. Heal Educ Behav. 2013;40(1):56-66. doi:10.1177/1090198112436970
40.
YeeLMMcGuireJMTaylorSMNiznikCMSimonMA. Social and environmental barriers to nutrition therapy for diabetes management among underserved pregnant women: a qualitative analysis. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2016;48(3):170-180.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2015.11.003
41.
Cuesta-BriandBSaggersSMcManusA. “It still leaves me sixty dollars out of pocket”: experiences of diabetes medical care among low-income earners in Perth. Aust J Prim Health. 2014;20(2):143-150. doi:10.1071/PY12096
42.
DaoJSpoonerCLoWHarrisMF. Factors influencing self-management in patients with type 2 diabetes in general practice: a qualitative study. Aust J Prim Health. 2019;25(2):176-184. doi: 10.1071/PY18095
43.
HushieM. Exploring the barriers and facilitators of dietary self-care for type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study in Ghana. Heal Promot Perspect. 2019;9(3):223-232. doi:10.15171/hpp.2019.31
44.
MogreVJohnsonNATzelepisFPaulC. Barriers to diabetic self-care: a qualitative study of patients’ and healthcare providers’ perspectives. J Clin Nurs. 2019;28(11-12):2296-2308. doi:10.1111/jocn.14835
45.
CampbellDJTMannsBJHemmelgarnBRSanmartinCEdwardsAKing-ShierK. Understanding financial barriers to care in patients with diabetes: an exploratory qualitative study. Diabetes Educ. 2017;43(1):78-86. doi:10.1177/0145721716679276
46.
GregsonJFoersterSBOrrR, et al. System, environmental, and policy changes: using the social-ecological model as a framework for evaluating nutrition education and social marketing programs with low-income audiences. J Nutr Educ. 2001;33(suppl 1):S4-S15. doi:10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60065-1
47.
OhlanderK. Policy, Systems, and Environmental Change Resource Guide Purpose of the Guide. Comprehensive Cancer Control; 2005.
48.
McLeroyKBibeauDStecklerAGlanzK. An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Q. 1988;15:351-377.
49.
GreenLRichardLPotvinL. Ecological foundations of health promotion. Am J Heal Promot. 1996;10(4):270-281.
50.
US Department of Health and Human Services and US Department of Agriculture. 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans. 8th ed.
51.
IslamNSWyattLCTaherMD, et al. A culturally tailored community health worker intervention leads to improvement in patient-centered outcomes for immigrant patients with type 2 diabetes. Clin Diabetes. 2018;36(2):100-111. doi:10.2337/cd17-0068
52.
SpencerMSRoslandAMKiefferEC, et al. Effectiveness of a community health worker intervention among African American and Latino adults with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(12):2253-2260. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2010.300106
53.
Shelton BrownHWilsonKJPagánJA, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a community health worker intervention for low-income Hispanic adults with diabetes. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9(8):1-9. doi:10.5888/pcd9.120074
54.
Pérez-EscamillaRHromi-FiedlerAVega-LópezSBermúdez-MillánASegura-PérezS. Impact of peer nutrition education on dietary behaviors and health outcomes among Latinos: a systematic literature review. J Nutr Educ. 2009;40(4):208-225. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2008.03.011.Impact
55.
HeislerM. Overview of peer support models to improve diabetes self-management and clinical outcomes. Diabetes Spectr. 2007; 20(4):214-221. doi:10.2337/diaspect.20.4.214
56.
KaiserLChaidezVAlgertS, et al. Food resource management education with SNAP participation improves food security. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2015;47(4):374-378.
57.
ByrneCKurmasNBurantCJUtechASteiberAJuliusM. Cooking classes: a diabetes self-management support intervention enhancing clinical values. Diabetes Educ. 2017;43(6):600-607. doi:10.1177/0145721717737741
58.
Eicher-MillerHMasonACAbbottARMcCabeGPBousheyCJ. The effect of food stamp nutrition education on the food insecurity of low-income women participants. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2009;41(3):161-168. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2008.06.004
59.
StotzSAThompsonJJBhargavaVScarrowACapitanoKLeeJS. A supplemental produce and eLearning nutrition education program for Georgians who utilize safety-net clinics for their healthcare: experiences from participants. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019;51(9):1099-1106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2019.06.018
60.
CavanaghMJurkowskiJBozlakCHastingsJKleinA. Veggie Rx: an outcome evaluation of a healthy food incentive programme. Public Health Nutr. 2017;20(14):2636-2641. doi:10.1017/S1368980016002081
61.
RidbergRABellJFMerrittKEHarrisDMYoungHMTancrediDJ. Effect of a fruit and vegetable prescription program on children’s fruit and vegetable consumption. Prev Chronic Dis. 2019;16(6):1-13. doi:10.5888/pcd16.180555
62.
ChoiSESeligmanHBasuS. Cost effectiveness of subsidizing fruit and vegetable purchases through the supplemental nutrition assistance program. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52(5):e147-e155. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.12.013
FrazeTLewisVARodriguezHPFisherES. Housing, transportation, and food: how ACOs seek to improve population health by addressing nonmedical needs of patients. Health Aff. 2016; 35(11):2109-2115. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0727
65.
DollahiteJOlsonCScott-PierceM. The impact of nutrition education on food insecurity among low-income participants in EFNEP. Fam Consum Sci Res J. 2003;32(2):127-139. doi:10.1177/1077727X03032002003
66.
WhitebirdRRKreitzerMJO’ConnorPJ. Mindfulness-based stress reduction and diabetes. Diabetes Spectr. 2009;22(4):226-230. doi:10.2337/diaspect.22.4.226
67.
MillerCKKristellerJLHeadingsANagarajaHMiserWF. Comparative effectiveness of a mindful eating intervention to a diabetes self-management intervention among adults with type 2 diabetes: a pilot study. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012;112(11):1835-1842. doi:10.1016/j.jand.2012.07.036
68.
MillerCK. Mindful eating with diabetes. Diabetes Spectr. 2017;30(2):89-94. doi:10.2337/ds16-0039
69.
QuandtSADupuisJFishCD’AgostinoRB. Feasibility of using a community-supported agriculture program to improve fruit and vegetable inventories and consumption in an underresourced urban community. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10(1):1-9. doi:10.5888/pcd10.130053
70.
GuestGNameyEMcKennaK. How many focus groups are enough? Building an evidence base for nonprobability sample sizes. Field Methods. 2017;29(1):3-22. doi:10.1177/1525822X16639015
71.
VasileiouKBarnettJThorpeSYoungT. Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):1-18. doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7
72.
National Association of Community Health Centers. PRAPARE. Protocol for Responding to and Assessing Patients’ Assets, Risks, and Experineces. 2019. Accessed April 28, 2020. http://www.nachc.org/research-and-data/prapare/
