The purpose of this qualitative descriptive study was to examine the National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support (DSMES) defined diabetes self-care behaviors (healthy eating, being active, taking medication, monitoring, problem solving, reducing risk, and healthy coping) in the context of older community-dwelling American Indians (AIs).
Methods
Secondary theme analysis of transcribed semistructured qualitative interview data from 28 participants in the Native Elder Care Study aged >60 years identified factors that influence the DSMES self-care behaviors in the context of community-dwelling AIs.
Results
Four themes that characterized barriers, facilitators, and opportunities for DSMES to support self-care behaviors included community food security, care partners in self-care, community opportunities for diabetes support, and blending of both health worlds.
Conclusion
Tribal communities have contemporary strengths and cultural traditions that can be activated to enhance diabetes self-management education and support. Diabetes educators can work in tandem with community health representatives to strengthen the social and community support within which individual AIs with type 2 diabetes mellitus live. Community-based participatory research with AI caregivers, dyads, families, youth, and Indian Health Service clinicians may help to improve tribal food policy and school health initiatives, as well as develop intergenerational interventions for modeling effective diabetes self-management.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LorigKRitterPLLaurentDD, et al. Online diabetes self-management program: a randomized study. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(6):1275-1281.
2.
JiangLMansonSMBealsJ, et al. Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program into American Indian and Alaska Native communities: results from the Special Diabetes Program for Indians Diabetes Prevention demonstration project. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(7):2027-2034.
3.
FriedenTR. CDC health disparities and inequalities report—United States, 2013. Foreword. MMWR Suppl. 2013;62(3):1-2.
4.
GoinsRTNoonanCGonzalesKWinchesterBBradleyVL. Association of depressive symptomology and psychological trauma with diabetes control among older American Indian women: does social support matter?J Diabetes Complications. 2017;31(4):669-674.
5.
O’ConnellJRockellJOuelletJCLeBeauM. Disparities in potentially preventable hospitalizations between American Indian and Alaska native and non-Hispanic white Medicare enrollees. Med Care. 2017;55(6):569-575.
6.
PolonskyWH. Emotional and quality-of-life aspects of diabetes management. Curr Diab Rep. 2002;2(2):153-159.
7.
FisherLHesslerDMPolonskyWHMullanJ. When is diabetes distress clinically meaningful? Establishing cut points for the Diabetes Distress Scale. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(2):259-264.
8.
RickRHoyeREThronRWKumarV. Marketplace clinics complementing diabetes care for urban residing American Indians. J Prim Care Community Health. 2017;8(4):198-205.
9.
ThompsonSJGiffordSM. Trying to keep a balance: the meaning of health and diabetes in an urban aboriginal community. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51(10):1457-1472.
10.
BeckJGreenwoodDABlantonL, et al. 2017 National standards for diabetes self-management education and support. Diabetes Educ. 2017;43(5):449-464.
11.
World Health Organization. Culture Matters: Using a Cultural Contexts of Health Approach to Enhance Policy-Making. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 2017.
12.
TowneSDBolinJFerdinandANicklettEJSmithMLOryMG. Assessing diabetes and factors associated with foregoing medical care among persons with diabetes: disparities facing American Indian/Alaska Native, black, Hispanic, low income, and southern adults in the U.S. (2011-2015). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(5):E464.
13.
ParsonsSLuzioSBainS, et al. Self-monitoring of blood glucose in non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes (The SMBG Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Endocr Disord. 2017;17(1):4.
14.
MayorS. Glucose self monitoring may not improve control in non-insulin treated type 2 diabetes. BMJ. 2017;357:j2832.
15.
HiratsukaVYMooreLDillardDA, et al. Development of a screening and brief intervention process for symptoms of psychological trauma among primary care patients of two American Indian and Alaska Native health systems. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2017;44(2):224-241.
16.
O’ConnellJMWilsonCMansonSMActonKJ. The costs of treating American Indian adults with diabetes within the Indian health service. Am J Public Health. 2012;102(2):301-308.
17.
GoinsRTJonesJSchureMWinchesterBBradleyV. Type 2 diabetes management among older American Indians: beliefs, attitudes, and practices [published online July3, 2018]. Ethn Health.
18.
JohnsonPJGhildayalNRockwoodTEverson-RoseSA. Differences in diabetes self-care activities by race/ethnicity and insulin use. Diabetes Educ. 2014;40(6):767-777.
19.
ScartonLJBakasTMillerWRPoeGDHuberLL. Needs and concerns of family caregivers of persons with type 2 diabetes: an integrated review of cross-cultural literature with implications for the American Indian population. Diabetes Educ. 2014;40(4):444-452.
20.
HeatonJ. What is secondary analysis? In: HeatonJ, ed. Reworking Qualitative Data. 2013 Sage Research Methods. London, UK: Sage; 2004:1-18.
21.
GoinsRTGarroutteEMFoxSLDee GeigerSMansonSM. Theory and practice in participatory research: lessons from the Native Elder Care Study. Gerontologist. 2011;51(3):285-294.
22.
ScartonLJde GrootM. Emotional and behavioral aspects of diabetes in American Indians/Alaska Natives. Health Educ Behav. 2017;44(1):70-82.
23.
WhitewaterSReinschmidtKMKahnCAttakaiATeufel-ShoneNI. Flexible roles for American Indian elders in community-based participatory research. Prev Chronic Dis. 2016;13:E72.
24.
SallisJFOwensN. Ecological models of health behavior. In: GlanzKRimerBK, eds. Health Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practice. Vol 5. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2015:43-64.
25.
CreswellJWCreswellJD. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches5th ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2017.
26.
JonesJNowelsCTSudoreRAhluwaliaSBekelmanDB. The future as a series of transitions: qualitative study of heart failure patients and their informal caregivers. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(2):176-182.
27.
HsiehHFShannonSE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277-1288.
28.
American Association of Diabetes. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(suppl 1):S13-S27.
29.
TongASainsburyPCraigJ. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349-357.
30.
GillilandSSAzenSPPerezGECarterJS. Strong in body and spirit: lifestyle intervention for Native American adults with diabetes in New Mexico. Diabetes Care. 2002;25(1):78-83.
31.
JiangLBealsJWhitesellNRRoubideauxYMansonSMWhitesellNR; AI-SUPERPFP Team. Stress burden and diabetes in two American Indian reservation communities. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(3):427-429.
32.
PolonskyWHHenryRR. Poor medication adherence in type 2 diabetes: recognizing the scope of the problem and its key contributors. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016;10:1299-1307.
33.
PolonskyWHCapehornMBeltonA, et al. Physician-patient communication at diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and its links to patient outcomes: new results from the global IntroDia(R) study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;127:265-274.
34.
EdelmanSVPolonskyWH. Response to comment on Edelman and Polonsky. Type 2 diabetes in the real world: the elusive nature of glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:1425-1432. Diabetes Care.2018;41(2):e18.
35.
EdelmanSVPolonskyWH. Type 2 diabetes in the real world: the elusive nature of glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2017;40(11): 1425-1432.
36.
MendenhallTJBergeJMHarperP, et al. The family education diabetes series (FEDS): community-based participatory research with a midwestern American Indian community. Nurs Inq. 2010; 17(4):359-372.
37.
HendersonLC. Divergent models of diabetes among American Indian elders. J Cross Cult Gerontol. 2010;25(4):303-316.
38.
WallsMLGonzalezJGladneyTOnelloE. Unconscious biases: racial microaggressions in American Indian health care. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015;28(2):231-239.
39.
ScartonLJBakasTPoeGDHullMAOngwelaLAMillerWR. Needs and concerns of family caregivers of American Indians, African Americans, and Caucasians with type 2 diabetes. Clin Nurs Res. 2016;25(2):139-156.
40.
RiceKTe HiwiBZwarensteinM, et al. Best practices for the prevention and management of diabetes and obesity-related chronic disease among indigenous peoples in Canada: a review. Can J Diabetes. 2016;40(3):216-225.
41.
LeeJESongSAhnJSKimYLeeJE. Use of a mobile application for self-monitoring dietary intake: feasibility test and an intervention study. Nutrients. 2017;9(7):E748.
42.
SongYNamSParkSShinISKuBJ. The impact of social support on self-care of patients with diabetes: what is the effect of diabetes type? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Educ. 2017;43(4):396-412.
43.
Devito DabbsASongMKDe GeestSDavidsonPM. Promoting patient and caregiver engagement in self-management of chronic illness. Nurs Res Pract. 2013;2013:180757.
44.
MamykinaLHeitkemperESmaldoneAM, et al. Personal discovery in diabetes self-management: discovering cause and effect using self-monitoring data. J Biomed Inform. 2017;76:1-8.
45.
SusanC. Reinhard LFF, Rita Choula, Ari Houser. Valuing the Invaluable 2015 Update: Undeniable Progress, but Big Gaps Remain. Washington, DC: AARP Public Policy Institute; 2015.
46.
WolffJLSpillmanBCFreedmanVAKasperJD. A national profile of family and unpaid caregivers who assist older adults with health care activities. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(3):372-379.
47.
ShawJLBrownJKhanBMauMKDillardD. Resources, roadblocks and turning points: a qualitative study of American Indian/Alaska Native adults with type 2 diabetes. J Community Health. 2013;38(1):86-94.
48.
GoinsRTSpencerSMMcGuireLCGoldbergJWenYHendersonJA. Adult caregiving among American Indians: the role of cultural factors. Gerontologist. 2011;51(3):310-320.
49.
ScartonLJBakasTMillerWRMcLennonSMHuberLLHullMA. Development and psychometric testing of the diabetes caregiver activity and support scale. Diabetes Educ. 2017;43(5):465-475.
