The purpose of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of integrating Community Health Workers (CHWs) as part of the team leading diabetes group visits.
Methods
This was a randomized controlled study that integrated CHWs as part of the team leading diabetes group visits for low-income Hispanic adults (n = 50). Group visits met for 3 hours each month for a 6-month duration. Main measures included baseline and 6-month clinical outcomes (ie, A1C, lipids), concordance with 8 standard of care guidelines (ie, screens for cervical, breast, and colon cancer) from the US Preventive Task Force and American Diabetes Association, and participant acceptability.
Results
Compared to control participants, the intervention group resulted in significantly better clinical outcomes or guideline concordance for the following areas: target A1C levels, retinal eye exams, diabetes foot exams, mammograms, and urine microalbumin. Significantly more individuals in the control group gained weight, whereas a greater number of participants in the intervention group lost weight. Intervention participants found the group visits highly acceptable.
Conclusions
Integrating CHWs as part a comprehensive diabetes group visit program is a feasible and effective system-level intervention to improve glycemic control and achieve guideline concordance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Number of Americans with Diabetes Projected to Double or Triple by 2050. Atlanta, GA: Center for Disease Control; 2010.
2.
PettersonSMLiawWRPhillipsRLRabinDLMeyersDSBazemoreAW.Projecting US primary care physician workforce needs: 2010-2025. Ann Fam Med. 2012;10(6):503-509.
3.
American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2012. Diabetes Care. 2012;36(4):1033-1046.
4.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Fact Sheet: National Estimates and General Information on Diabetes and Prediabetes in the United States. Atlanta: CDC; 2014.
5.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes 2017. Journal of Clinical and Applied Research and Education. 2017;40(S1):S1-S134.
SriwijitkamolAMoungngernYVannaseangS.Attainment of American Diabetes Association clinical practice recommendations in 722 Thai type 2 diabetes patients. J Med Assoc Thai. 2011;94(1):S159-S167.
9.
ClancyDEHuangPOkonofuaEYeagerDMagruderKM.Group visits: promoting adherence to diabetes guidelines. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(5):620-624.
10.
BurkeREOGradyET.Group visits hold great potential for improving diabetes care and outcomes, but best practices must be developed. Health Affairs. 2012;31(1):103-109.
11.
ClancyDEHuangPOkonofuaEYeagerDMagruderMM. Group visits: Promoting adherence to diabetes guidelines. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(5):620-624.
12.
BarnettKG.Group medical visits: the future of healthcare?Glob Adv Health Med. 2015;4(6):6-7.
13.
VachonGCEzikeNBrown-WalkerMChhayVPikelnyIPendergraftTB.Improving access to diabetes care in an inner-city, community-based outpatient health center with a monthly open-access, multistation group visit program. J Natl Med Assoc. 2007;99(12):1327-1336.
14.
DavisASawyerDRVinciLM.The potential of group visits in diabetes care. Clin Diabetes. 2008;26(2):58-62.
15.
JonesKRKaewluangNLekhakN.Group visits for chronic illness managementNursing Economics. 2014;32(3):118-134.
16.
RileySBMarshallES.Group visits in diabetes care: a systematic review. Diabetes Educ. 2010;36(6):936-944.
17.
EdelmanDGierischJMMcDuffieJROddoneEWilliamsJW.Shared medical appointments for patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(1):99-106.
18.
HousdenLWongSTDawesM.Effectiveness of group medical visits for improving diabetes care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2013;185(13):E635-E644.
19.
ClancyDECopeDWMagruderKMHuangPSalterKHFieldsAW.Evaluating group visits in an uninsured or inadequately insured patient population with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2003;29(2):292-302.
20.
RowleyWRBezoldCArikanYByrneEKroheS.Diabetes 2030: insights from yesterday, today, and future trends. Popul Health Manag. 2017;20(1):6-12.
21.
MoralesLSLaraMKingtonRSValdezROEscarceJJ.Socioeconomic, cultural, and behavioral factors affecting Hispanic health outcomes. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2007;13(4):477-503.
22.
GarciaMEGrantRW.Community Health Workers: a missing piece of the puzzle for complex patients with diabetes?J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(7):878-879.
23.
PeekMECargillAHuangES.Diabetes health disparities. Med Care Res Rev. 2007;64(5):101S-156S.
24.
Del PratoSGiuseppePMiccoliR. Changing the treatment paradigm for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(2):S217-S222.
25.
FurinoA.Community Health Worker National Workforce Study. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2007.
26.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC’s Division of Diabetes Translation Community Health Workers/Promotores de Salud: Critical Connections in Communities. Atlanta, GA: Center for Disease Control; 2002.
27.
NorrisSLChowdhuryFMVan LeKet al. Effectiveness of community health workers in the care of persons with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2006;23(5):544-556.
28.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Addressing Chronic Disease Through Community Health Workers: A Policy and Systems-Level Approach. 2nd ed.Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2015.
29.
ColleranKHardingEKippBJet al. Building capacity to reduce disparities in diabetes: training community health workers using an integrated distance learning model. Diabetes Educ. 2012;38(3):386-396.
30.
World Health Organization. Community Health Workers: What Do We Know About Them?Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
31.
PerryHZulligerR.How Effective Are Community Health Workers?Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University; 2012.
32.
ShahMKaselitzEHeislerM.The role of Community Health Workers in diabetes: update on current literature. Curr Diab Rep. 2014;13(2):163-171.
33.
LehmannUSandersD.Community Health Workers: What Do We Know About Them? The State of the Evidence on Programmes, Activities, Costs and Impact on Health Outcomes of Using Community Health Workers. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
34.
CollinsworthAVulimiriMSneadCWaltonJ.Community health workers in primary care practice: redesigning health care delivery systems to extend and improve diabetes care in underserved populations. Health Promot Pract. 2014;15(suppl 2):51S-61S.
35.
RuggieroLOrosSChoiYK.Community-based translation of the diabetes prevention program’s lifestyle intervention in an underserved Latino population. Diabetes Educ. 2011;37(4):564-572.
36.
SpencerMSRoslandAMKiefferECet al. Effectiveness of a Community Health Worker intervention among African American and Latino adults with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(12):2253-2260.
37.
BrownHS3rdWilsonKJPaganJAet al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a community health worker intervention for low-income Hispanic adults with diabetes. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E140.
38.
KaneSKokMOrmelHet al. Limits and opportunities to community health worker empowerment: a multi-country comparative study. Soc Sci Med. 2016;164:27-34.
39.
SureshKP.An overview of randomization techniques: an unbiased assessment of outcome in clinical research. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011;4(1):8-11.
40.
KangoviSGrandeDTrinh-ShevrinC.From rhetoric to reality—Community Health Workers in post-reform U.S. health care. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2277-2279.
41.
SpencerMSGunterKEPalmisanoG.Community Health Workers and their value to social work. Soc Work. 2010;55(2):169-180.
42.
KoskanAMFriedmanDBBrandtHMWalsemannKMMessiasDKH. Preparing promotoras to deliver health programs for Hispanic communities: training processes and curricula. Health Promot Pract. 2013;14(3).
43.
University of Texas School of Public Health. Community Health Worker Certification/Continuing Education Program. 2017. https://sph.uth.edu/research/centers/tphtc/. Accessed September 15, 2017.
44.
LorigKHolmanHSobelDLaurentDGonzalezVMinorM.Living a Healthy Life With Chronic Conditions, 4th Edition. Boulder, CO: Bull Publishing Company; 2012.
HusseinWIHasanKJaradatAA.Effectiveness of mobile phone short message service on diabetes mellitus management; the SMS-DM study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;94(1):e24-e26.
47.
PietteJDAikensJRoslandAMSussmanJB.Re-thinking the frequency of between-visit monitoring for patients with diabetes. Med Care. 2014;52(6):511-518.
48.
ThabaneLMaJChengJiet al. A tutorial on pilot studies: the what, why and how. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2010;10(1).
49.
BillinghamSAWhiteheadALJuliousSA.An audit of sample sizes for pilot and feasibility trials being undertaken in the United Kingdom registered in the United Kingdom Clinical Research Network database. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13:104.
50.
JuliousSA.Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilt study. Pharmaceutica Stat. 2005;4:287-291.
51.
BrowneRH.On the use of a pilot sample for sample size determination. Stat Med. 1995;14(17):1933-1940.
52.
BillinghamSAWhiteheadALJuliousSA.An audit of sample sizes for pilot and feasibility trials being undertaken in the United Kingdom registered in the United Kingdom Clinical Research Network database. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(104):1471-2288.
TarimanJDBerryDLHalpennyBWolpinSScheppK.Validation and testing of the Acceptability E-scale for Web-based patient-reported outcomes in cancer care. Appl Nurs Res. 2012;24(1):53-58.
55.
BrayPRoupeMYoungSHarrellJCummingsDMWhetstoneLM.Feasibility and effectiveness of system redesign for diabetes care management in rural areas: the eastern North Carolina experience. Diabetes Educ. 2005;31(5):712-718.
56.
ReitzJASarfatyMDiamondJJSalzmanB.The effects of a group visit program on outcomes of diabetes care in an urban family practice. J Urban Health. 2012;89(4):709-716.
57.
Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(6):393-403.
58.
MaJYankVXiaoLet al. Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program lifestyle intervention for weight loss into primary care: a randomized trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(2):113-121.
59.
SchillingerDWangFHandleyMHammerH.Effects of self-management support on structure, process, and outcomes among vulnerable patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:559-566.
60.
International Expert Committee. International Diabetes Federation Atlas. 2017. http://www.diabetesatlas.org. Accessed September 15, 2017.
