BrunisholzKDBriotPHamiltonS. Diabetes self-management education improves quality of care and clinical outcomes determined by a diabetes bundle measure. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2014;7:533-542.
2.
WeaverRGHemmelgarnBRRabiDM. Association between participation in a brief diabetes education programme and glycaemic control in adults with newly diagnosed diabetes. Diabet Med. 2014;31:1610-1614.
3.
SteinsbekkARyggLOLisuloMRiseMBFretheimA. Group based diabetes self-management education compared to routine treatment for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A systematic review with meta-analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012;12:213.
4.
DuncanIBirkmeyerCCoughlinSLiQSherrDBorenS. Assessing the value of diabetes education. Diabetes Educ. 2009;35:752-760.
5.
FanLSidaniS. Effectiveness of diabetes self-management education intervention elements: a meta-analysis. Can J Diabetes. 2009;33:18-26.
6.
EllisSESperoffTDittusRSBrownAPichertJWElasyTA. Diabetes patient education: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. Patient Educ Couns. 2004;52:97-105.
7.
NorrisSLLauJSmithSJSchmidCHEngelgauMM. Self-management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:1159-1171.
8.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S5-S87.
9.
BerwickDMNolanTWWhittingtonJ. The triple aim: care, health, and cost. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27:759-769.
10.
HealySJBlackDHarrisCLorenzADunganKM. Inpatient diabetes education is associated with less frequent hospital readmission among patients with poor glycemic control. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:2960-2967.
11.
DuncanIAhmedTLiQE. Assessing the value of the diabetes educator. Diab Educ. 2011;37:638-657.
12.
RobbinsJMThatcherGEWebbDAValdmanisVG. Nutritionist visits, diabetes classes, and hospitalization rates and charges: the Urban Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:655-660.
13.
BrownHSIIIWilsonKJPagánJA. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a community health worker intervention for low-income Hispanic adults with diabetes. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E140.
14.
American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:1033-1046.
15.
BoyleJPThompsonTJGreggEWBarkerLEWilliamsonDF. Projection of the year 2050 burden of diabetes in the US adult population: dynamic modeling of incidence, mortality, and prediabetes prevalence. Popul Health Metr. 2010;8:29.
16.
SiminerioLRuppertKHuberKToledoFG. Telemedicine for Reach, Education, Access, and Treatment (TREAT): linking telemedicine with diabetes self-management education to improve care in rural communities. Diabetes Educ. 2014;40:797-805.
17.
TshianangaJKKocherSWeberCErny-AlbrechtKBerndtKNeeserK. The effect of nurse-led diabetes self-management education on glycosylated hemoglobin and cardiovascular risk factors: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Educ. 2012;38:108-123.
18.
WelchGZagarinsSEFeinbergRGGarbJL. Motivational interviewing delivered by diabetes educators: does it improve blood glucose control among poorly controlled type 2 diabetes patients?Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011;91:54-60.
19.
DeakinTMcShaneCECadeJEWilliamsRD. Group based training for self-management strategies in people with diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(2):CD003417.
20.
GaryTLGenkingerJMGuallarEPeyrotMBrancatiFL. Meta-analysis of randomized educational and behavioral interventions in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2003;29:488-501.
21.
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:977-986.
22.
StrattonIMAdlerAINeilHA. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000;321:405-412.
23.
CookeDBondRLawtonJ.; UK NIHR DAFNE Study Group. Structured type 1 diabetes education delivered within routine care: impact on glycemic control and diabetes-specific quality of life. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:270-272.
24.
CochranJConnVS. Meta-analysis of quality of life outcomes following diabetes self-management training. Diabetes Educ. 2008;34:815-823.
25.
TrentoMPasseraPBorgoE. A 5-year randomized controlled study of learning, problem solving ability, and quality of life modifications in people with type 2 diabetes managed by group care. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:670-675.
26.
ToobertDJGlasgowREStryckerLA. Biologic and quality-of-life outcomes from the Mediterranean Lifestyle Program: a randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:2288-2293.
27.
ToobertDJStryckerLAKingDKBarreraMJrOsunaDGlasgowRE. Long-term outcomes from a multiple-risk-factor diabetes trial for Latinas: ¡Viva Bien!. Transl Behav Med. 2011;1:416-426.
28.
TangTSFunnellMMOhM. Lasting effects of a 2-year diabetes self-management support intervention: outcomes at 1-year follow-up. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E109.
29.
ThorpeCTFaheyLEJohnsonHDeshpandeMThorpeJMFisherEB. Facilitating healthy coping in patients with diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Educ. 2013;39:33-52.
30.
FisherLHesslerDGlasgowRE. REDEEM: a pragmatic trial to reduce diabetes distress. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:2551-2558.
31.
HermannsNSchmittAGahrA. The effect of a diabetes-specific cognitive behavioral treatment program (DIAMOS) for patients with diabetes and subclinical depression: results of a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2015;38:551-560.
32.
de GrootMDoyleTKushnickM. Can lifestyle interventions do more than reduce diabetes risk? Treating depression in adults with type 2 diabetes with exercise and cognitive behavioral therapy. Curr Diab Rep. 2012;12:157-166.
33.
WagnerEHBennettSMAustinBTGreeneSMSchaeferJKVonkorffM. Finding common ground: patient-centeredness and evidence-based chronic illness care. J Altern Complement Med. 2005;11(suppl 1):S7-S15.
34.
BowenMERothmanRL. Multidisciplinary management of type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2010;3:113-124.
35.
HaasLMaryniukMBeckJ.; 2012 Standards Revision Task Force. National Standards for diabetes self-management education and support. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:2393-2401.
TangTSFunnellMSincoB. Comparative effectiveness of peer leaders and community health workers in diabetes self-management support: results of a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:1525-1534.
38.
ThomDHGhorobAHesslerDDe VoreDChenEBodenheimerTA. Impact of peer health coaching on glycemic control in low-income patients with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med. 2013;11:137-144.
39.
TangTSAyalaGXCherringtonARanaG. A review of volunteer-based peer support interventions in diabetes. Diabetes Spectrum. 2011;24:85-98.
40.
FunnellMM. Peer-based behavioural strategies to improve chronic disease self-management and clinical outcomes: evidence, logistics, evaluation considerations and needs for future research. Fam Pract. 2010;27(suppl 1):i17-i22.
41.
HeislerM. Overview of peer support models to improve diabetes self-management and clinical outcomes. Diabetes Spectrum. 2007;20:214-221.
42.
MarreroDGArdJDelamaterAM. Twenty-first century behavioral medicine: a context for empowering clinicians and patients with diabetes: a consensus report. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:463-470.
43.
InzucchiSEBergenstalRMBuseJB. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach: position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2012;35:1364-1379.
44.
MillerWRRollnickS. Why do people change? In: Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change. 2nd ed.New York: Guilford Press; 2002: 3-12.
45.
FunnellMMAndersonRM. Empowerment and self-management of diabetes. Clinical Diabetes. 2004;22:123-127.
46.
RollnickSMasonPButlerC. Health Behavior Change: A Guide for Practitioners. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1999.
47.
WeingerKMacNeilTGreenlawSM. Behavioral strategies for improving self-management. In: ChildsBPCypressMSpollettG, eds. Complete Nurse’s Guide to Diabetes Care. 3rd ed.Alexandria, VA: American Diabetes Association;In press.
48.
SkovlundSEPeyrotM. The Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes, and Needs (DAWN) program: a new approach to improving outcomes of diabetes care. Diabetes Spectrum. 2005;18:136-142.
49.
WeissMAFunnellMM. In the beginning: setting the stage for effective diabetes care. Clinical Diabetes. 2009;27:149-151.
50.
Philis-TsimikasAWalkerC. Improved care for diabetes in underserved populations. J Ambul Care Manage. 2001;24:39-43.
51.
KarterAJSubramanianUSahaC. Barriers to insulin initiation: the Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes Insulin Starts Project. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:733-735.
52.
American Association of Diabetes Educators. AADE position statement. Individualization of diabetes self-management education. Diabetes Educ. 2007;33:45-49
53.
Kovacs BurnsKNicolucciAHoltRI; DAWN2 Study Group. Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs second study (DAWN2TM): cross-national benchmarking indicators for family members living with people with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2013;30:778-788.
54.
PeyrotMKovacs BurnsKDaviesM. Diabetes Attitudes Wishes and Needs 2 (DAWN2): a multinational, multi-stakeholder study of psychosocial issues and person-centered diabetes care. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2013;99:174-184.
55.
VaccaroJAExebioJCZariniGDHuffmanFG. The role of family/friend social support in diabetes self-management for minorities with type 2 diabetes. J Nutrition Health. 2014;2:1-9.
56.
ArmourTANorrisSLJackLJrZhangXFisherL. The effectiveness of family interventions in people with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Diabet Med. 2005;22:1295-1305.
57.
GallantMP. The influence of social support on chronic illness self-management: a review and directions for research. Health Educ Behav. 2003;30:170-195.
58.
FunnellMMAndersonRMPiattGA. Empowerment, engagement, and shared decision making in the real world of clinical practice. Consultant. 2014;53:358-362.
59.
ChewBHShariff-GhazaliSFernandezA. Psychological aspects of diabetes care: effecting behavioral change in patients. World J Diabetes. 2014;5:796-808.
60.
PeyrotMRubinRRLauritzenTSnoekFJMatthewsDRSkovlundSE. Psychosocial problems and barriers to improved diabetes management: results of the cross-national Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN) study. Diabet Med. 2005;22:1379-1385.
61.
FisherLHesslerDMPolonskyWHMullanJ. When is diabetes distress clinically meaningful? Establishing cut points for the Diabetes Distress Scale. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:259-264.
62.
BerkowitzBAMeigsJBDeWaltD. Material need insecurities, control of diabetes mellitus, and use of health care resources: results of the Measuring Economic Insecurity in Diabetes study. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:257-265.
Hess-FischlA. Practical management of patient with diabetes in critical care. From a diabetes educator’s perspective. Crit Care Nurs Q. 2004;27:189-200.
65.
EvertABBoucherJLCypressM. Nutrition therapy recommendations for the management of adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:3821-3842.
66.
LiRShresthaSSLipmanRBurrowsNRKolbLERutledgeS. Diabetes self-management education and training among privately insured persons with newly diagnosed diabetes—United States, 2011-2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63:1045-1049.
67.
PeyrotMRubinRRFunnellMMSiminerioLM. Access to diabetes self-management education: results of national surveys of patients, educators, and physicians. Diabetes Educ. 2009;35:246-263.
68.
NicolucciAKovacs BurnsKHoltRI.; DAWN2 Study Group. Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs second study (DAWN2TM): cross-national benchmarking of diabetes-related psychosocial outcomes for people with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2013;30:767-777.
69.
Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.
70.
CusackCMKnudsonADKronstadtJLSingerRFBrownAL. Practice-based population health: information technology to support transformation to proactive primary care (prepared for the AHRQ National Resource Center for Health Information Technology under contract no. 290-04-0016). AHRQ publication no. 10-0092-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2010.
71.
PhillipsLSBarbDYongC. Translating what works: a new approach to improve diabetes management [published online March9, 2015]. J Diabetes Sci Technol. doi:10.1177/1932296815576000
72.
SheaSWeinstockRSTeresiJA; IDEATel Consortium. A randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in older, ethnically diverse, medically underserved patients with diabetes mellitus: 5 year results of the IDEATel study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16:446-456.
73.
HuntJSSiemienczukJGillandersW. The impact of a physician-directed health information technology system on diabetes outcomes in primary care: a pre- and post-implementation study. Inform Prim Care. 2009;17:165-174.
74.
SiminerioLRuppertKMGabbayRA. Who can provide diabetes self-management support in primary care? Findings from a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Educ. 2013;39:705-713.
75.
PietteJDHeislerMWagnerTH. Cost-related medication underuse among chronically ill adults: the treatments people forgo, how often, and who is at risk. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:1782-1787.
CharlesCGafniAWhelanT. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651-661.
78.
ParchmanMLZeberJEPalmerRF. Participatory decision making, patient activation, medication adherence, and intermediate clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a STARNet study. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8:410-417.