The purpose was to conduct focus groups with Hispanic employees to obtain input into adaptation of previous DSME interventions for use as a workplace diabetes prevention program.
Methods
From a list of interested Hispanic employees who attended a local health fair (n = 68), 36 were randomly selected to participate in focus groups held during supper mealtime breaks. An experienced bilingual moderator directed the sessions, using interview guidelines developed by the research team.
Results
Participants’ ages ranged from 22 to 65 years (mean = 50.4, n = 36, SD = 10.7), 7 males and 29 females attended, and 53% had type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Employees expressed a keen interest in diabetes classes and recommended a focus on preparing healthier Hispanic foods. Primary barriers to promoting healthier lifestyles were work schedules; many employees worked 2 part-time or full-time jobs. Administrators and direct supervisors of the employees were highly supportive of a workplace diabetes prevention program.
Conclusions
The consistent message was that a workplace program would be the ideal solution for Hispanic employees to learn about diabetes and healthy behaviors, given their busy schedules, family responsibilities, and limited resources. If found to be effective, such a workplace program would be generalizable to other service employees who have disproportionate diabetes rates.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SelvinEParrinelloCMSacksDBCoreshJ. Trends in prevalence and control of diabetes in the United States, 1988-1994 and 1999-2010. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:517-525.
American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2012. Diabetes Care. 2013;36:1033-1046.
4.
BarrDA. Health Disparities in the United States: Social Class, Race, Ethnicity, and Health. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2008.
5.
BrownSAGarciaAAKouzekananiKHanisCL. Culturally competent diabetes self-management education for Mexican Americans: the Starr County Border Health Initiative. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:259-268.
6.
BrownSABlozisSAKouzekananiKGarciaAAWinchellMHanisCL. Dosage effects of diabetes self-management education for Mexican Americans: the Starr County Border Health Initiative. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:527-532.
7.
GilmerTPO’ConnorPJRushWA. Predictors of health care costs in adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:59-64.
8.
CoxNJFriggeMNicolaeDL. Loci on chromosomes 2 (NIDDM1) and 15 interact to increase susceptibility to diabetes in Mexican Americans. Nat Genet. 1999;21:213-215.
9.
McDermottR. Ethics, epidemiology and the thrifty gene: biological determinism as a health hazard. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47:1189-1195.
10.
HanisCLBoerwinkleEChakrabortyR. A genome-wide search for human non-insulin-dependent (type 2) diabetes genes reveals a major susceptibility locus on chromosome 2. Nat Genet. 1996;13:161-166.
11.
RavussinEBogardusC. Energy balance and weight regulation: genetics versus environment. Br J Nutr. 2000;83:S17-S20.
12.
KlausJRHurwitzBELlabreMM. Central obesity and insulin resistance in the cardiometabolic syndrome: pathways to preclinical cardiovascular structure and function. J Cardiometab Syndr. 2009;4:63-71.
13.
DeprésJPLemieuxI. Abdominal obesity and metabolic syndrome. Nature. 2006;444:881-887.
14.
GuizeLPannierBThomasFBeanKJégoBBenetosA. Recent advances in metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2008;101:577-583.
15.
HaffnerSM. Abdominal adiposity and cardiometabolic risk: do we have all the answers?Am J Med. 2007;120(9suppl 1):S10-S16, 16-17.
16.
Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. The Diabetes Prevention Program: description of lifestyle intervention. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:2165-2171.
17.
National Institutes of Health. Consensus development conference on diet and exercise in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1987;10:639-644.
18.
HenryRRWiest-KentTAScheafferLKoltermanOGOlefskyJM. Metabolic consequences of very-low-calorie diet therapy in obese non-insulin-dependent diabetic and nondiabetic subjects. Diabetes Spectr. 1988;1:21-30.
19.
MauMKSinclairKSaitoEPBaumhoferKNKaholokulaJK. Cardiometabolic health disparities in native Hawaiians and other Pacific Islanders. Epidemiol Rev. 2009;31:113-129.
20.
BeatonSJRobinsonSBVon WorleyA. Cardiometabolic risk and health care utilization and cost for Hispanic and non-Hispanic women. Popul Health Manag. 2009;12:177-183.
21.
NIDDK Central Repository, The National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health. Diabetes Prevention Program outcomes study. https://www.niddkrepository.org/studies/dppos/. Accessed December 10, 2014.
22.
BraunTBambraCBoothMAdetayoKMilneE. Better health at work? An evaluation of the effects and cost-benefits of a structured workplace health improvement programme in reducing sickness absence [published online July 6, 2014]. J Public Health (Oxf). pii: fdu043.
23.
HoLSGittelsohnJHarrisSBFordE. Development of an integrated diabetes prevention program with First Nations in Canada. Health Promot Int. 2006;21:88-97.
24.
AldanaSGBarlowMSmithR. The Diabetes Prevention Program: a worksite experience. AAOHN J. 2005;53:499-505.
25.
AldanaSGGreenlawRLDiehlHASalbergAMerrillRMOhmineS. The effects of a worksite chronic disease prevention program. JOEM. 2005;47:558-564.
26.
AldanaSGBarlowMSmithR. A worksite diabetes prevention program: two-year impact on employee health. AAOHN J. 2006;54:389-395.
27.
GieseKKCookPF. Reducing obesity among employees of a manufacturing plant: translating the Diabetes Prevention Program to the workplace. Workplace Health Saf. 2014;62:136-141.
28.
Benavides-VaelloSGarcíaAABrownSAWinchellM. Using focus groups to plan and evaluate diabetes self-management interventions for Mexican Americans. Diabetes Educ. 2004;238:242-244, 247-250.
29.
StewartDWShamdasaniPN. Focus Groups: Theory and Practice. 2nd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 2007.
30.
WitkinBRAltschuldJW. Planning and Conducting Needs Assessments: A Practical Guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 1995.
31.
KruegerRA. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications; 1994.
32.
HaffnerSMFongDSternMP. Diabetic retinopathy in Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic Whites. Diabetes. 1988;37:878-884.
33.
AlcozerF. Secondary analysis of perceptions and meanings of type 2 diabetes among Mexican American women. Diabetes Educ. 2000;26:785-795.
34.
ResnicowKBaranowskiTAhluwaliaJSBraithwaiteRL. Cultural sensitivity in public health: defined and demystified. Ethn Dis. 1999;9:10-21.
35.
LiptonRBLeeMLGiachelloAMendezJGirottiMH. Attitudes and issues in treating Latino patients with type 2 diabetes: views of healthcare providers. Diabetes Educ. 1998;24:67-71.
36.
MarínGMarínBV. Research with Hispanic Populations. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications; 1991.
