The purpose of the current study was to pilot-test a positive psychology intervention to improve adherence to diabetes management in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
Methods
A total of 39 adolescents (ages, 13-17 years) with type 1 diabetes and their caregivers were randomized to a positive psychology intervention (n = 20) or an attention control (education) intervention (n = 19). The intervention condition used positive psychology exercises (eg, gratitude, self-affirmation), small gifts, and parent affirmations to boost positive affect. Outcomes included frequency of blood glucose monitoring, quality of life, and glycemic control.
Results
No main effects for treatment were observed at the 6-month follow-up. However, there was a significant association between adolescents’ levels of positive affect and measures of adherence, including self-report and meter downloads of glucose monitoring.
Conclusions
The results from the current study support the assertion that positive affect in the context of diabetes education is an important factor to consider in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LieseAD. The burden of diabetes mellitus among US youth: prevalence estimates from the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study. Pediatrics. 2006;118:1510-1518.
2.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes: 2013. Diabetes Care. 2013;35:S11-S66.
3.
BorusJALaffelL. Adherence challenges in the management of type 1 diabetes in adolescents: prevention and intervention. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2010;22:405-411.
4.
MulvaneySARothmanRLWallstonKALybargerCDietrichMS. An Internet-based program to improve self-managmenet in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:602-604.
5.
WysockiTHarrisMABucklohLM. Randomized trial of behavioral family systems therapy for diabetes: maintenance of effects on diabetes outcomes in adolescents. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:555-560.
6.
HanauerDAWentzellKLaffelNLaffelLM. Computerized Automated Reminder Diabetes System (CARDS): e-mail and SMS cell phone text messaging reminders to support diabetes management. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009;11:99-106.
7.
PressmanSDCohenS. Does positive affect influence health?Psychol Bull. 2005;131:925-971.
8.
IsenAMReeveJ. The influence of positive affect on intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: facilitation enjoyment of play, responsible work behavior, and self-control. Motiv Emotion. 2005;29:297-325.
9.
FortenberryKTButlerJMButnerJBergCAUpchurchRWiebeDJ. Perceived diabetes task competence mediates the relationship of both negative and positive affect with blood glucose in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Ann Behav Med. 2009;37:1-9.
10.
FredricksonBL. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: the broaden-and-build hypothesis of positive emotions. Am Psychol. 2001;56:218-226.
11.
JaserSSFaulknerMSWhittemoreR. Coping, self-management, and adaptation in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Ann Behav Med. 2012;43:311-319.
12.
SinNLLyubomirskyS. Enhancing well-being and alleviating depressive symptoms with positive psychology interventions: a practice-friendly meta-analysis. J Clin Psychol. 2009;65:467-487.
13.
OgedegbeGOBoutin-FosterCWellsMT. A randomized controlled trial of positive-affect intervention and medication adherence in hypertensive African Americans. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:322-326.
14.
PetersonJCCharlsonMEHoffmanZ. A randomized controlled trial of positive-affect induction to promote physical activity after percutaneous coronary intervention. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:329-336.
15.
SilversteinJHKlingensmithGCopelandK. Care of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:184-212.
16.
HallerMJStalveyMSSilversteinJH. Predictors of control of diabetes: monitoring may be the key. J Pediatr. 2004;144:660-661.
17.
CharlsonMEBoutin-FosterCMancusoCA. Randomized controlled trials of positive affect and self-affirmation to facilitate healthy behaviors in patients with cardiopulmonary diseases: rationale, trial design, and methods. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007;28:748-762.
18.
WatsonDClarkLA. Development and validation of a brief measure of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54:1063-1070.
19.
KovacsM. The Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI). Psychopharm Bull. 1985;21:995-998.
20.
RadloffLS. The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385-401.
21.
La GrecaA. Manual for the Self Care Inventory. Miami, FL: University of Miami; 2004.
22.
RubinRRYoung-HymanDPeyrotM. Parent-child responsibility and conflict in diabetes care. Diabetes. 1989;38(suppl 2):28A.
23.
VarniJWBurwinkleTMJacobsJRGottschalkMKaufmanFJonesKL. The PedsQL in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: reliability and validity of the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Generic Core Scales and Type 1 Diabetes Module. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:631-637.
24.
HoodKKPetersonCMRohanJMDrotarD. Association between adherence and glycemic control in pediatric type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Pediatr. 2010;124:1171-1179.
25.
IngerskiLMAndersonBJDolanLMHoodKK. Blood glucose monitoring and glycemic control in adolescence: contribution of diabetes-specific responsibility and family conflict. J Adolesc Health. 2010;47:191-197.
26.
SchillingLSKnaflKAGreyM. Changing patterns of self-management in youth with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr Nurs. 2006;21:412-424.
27.
CharlsonMEBoutin-FosterCMancusoCA. Three randomized controlled trials of positive affect and self-affirmation to facilitate health behavior changes in patients with cardiopulmonary diseases. Paper presented at: Society of Behavioral Medicine Annual Meeting; 2009; Montreal, Canada.
