The purpose of the study was to examine the characteristics of American young adults with increased risk for type 2 diabetes (T2D).
Methods
Participants ages 18 to 29, overweight/obese, and sedentary were recruited from the metro Atlanta area in the United States. Variables included demographics, anthropometric and clinical variables, and physical activity. Of 107 participants, 3 participants had undiagnosed diabetes and 1 participant did not complete the modifiable activity questionnaire. Thus, 103 young adults remained for the final data analysis.
Results
Most participants were females and African Americans. About 30% of participants had prediabetes, either impaired fasting glucose, an A1C of 5.7% to 6.4%, or both. Overall, prediabetes young adults were heavier and did less physical activity than Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) trial participants. In addition, these young adults had a higher prevalence of parental T2D history and lower level of physical activity compared to young adults with normoglycemia.
Conclusions
Physical activity and parent T2D history are key risk factors for identifying young adults with prediabetes. Multilevel strategies are necessary to raise awareness of diabetes risk and to prevent T2D in young adults.
American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(suppl 1):S62-S69.
3.
KnowlerWCBarrett-ConnorEFowlerSE. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(6):393-403.
4.
OrchardTJTemprosaMBarrett-ConnorE. Long-term effects of the Diabetes Prevention Program interventions on cardiovascular risk factors: a report from the DPP Outcomes Study. Diabet Med. 2013;30(1):46-55.
5.
The Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. The Diabetes Prevention Program: baseline characteristics of the randomized cohort. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(11):1619-1629.
6.
Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance—United States, 2007. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 2007;57(SS-4):1-131.
7.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2012. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(suppl 1):S11-S63.
8.
BangHEdwardsAMBombackAS. Development and validation of a patient self-assessment score for diabetes risk. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(11):775-783.
9.
NobleDMathurRDentTMeadsCGreenhalghT.Risk models and scores for type 2 diabetes: systematic review. BMJ. 2011; 343:d7163.
10.
TabaeiBPBurkeRConstanceA. Community-based screening for diabetes in Michigan. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(3): 668-670.
11.
American Diabetes Association. Screening for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2004;27(suppl 1):S11-S14.
12.
AlbertiKGZimmetPShawJ.International Diabetes Federation: a consensus on type 2 diabetes prevention. Diabet Med. 2007; 24:451-463.
13.
SchwarzPELiJReimannM. The Finnish Diabetes Risk Score is associated with insulin resistance and progression towards type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(3): 920-926.
14.
SaaristoTPeltonenMLindstromJ. Cross-sectional evaluation of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score: a tool to identify undetected type 2 diabetes, abnormal glucose tolerance and metabolic syndrome. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2005;2(2):67-72.
15.
KandulaNRKerseyMLurieN.Assuring the health of immigrants: what the leading health indicators tell us. Annu Rev Public Health. 2004;25:357-376.
16.
SaaristoTEBarengoNCKorpi-HyovaltiE. High prevalence of obesity, central obesity and abnormal glucose tolerance in the middle-aged Finnish population. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:423.
McCanceKHuetherSEBrrashersVRoteNS.Pathophysiology: The Biologic Basis for Disease in Adults and Children. 6th ed.St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2010.
19.
KriskaAMEdelsteinSLHammanRF. Physical activity in individuals at risk for diabetes: Diabetes Prevention Program. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(5):826-832.
Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(6):393-403.
22.
PerreaultLPanQMatherKJWatsonKEHammanRFKahnSE.Effect of regression from prediabetes to normal glucose regulation on long-term reduction in diabetes risk: results from the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. Lancet. 2012;379(9833):2243-2251.
23.
CohenJ.Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
24.
KaufmanFR.Type 2 diabetes in children and young adults: a “new epidemic.”Clin Diabetes. 2002;20(4):217-218.
ChaEClarkPCReillyCM. Educational needs for improving self-care in heart failure patients with diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2012;38(5):673-684.
27.
BalkauBMhamdiLOppertJM. Physical activity and insulin sensitivity: the RISC study. Diabetes. 2008;57(10):2613-2618.
28.
BurkeLEWangJ.Treatment strategies for overweight and obesity. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2011;43(4):368-375.
29.
PateRRPrattMBlairSN. Physical activity and public health. A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA. 1995;273(5):402-407.
30.
OwenKRShepherdMStrideAEllardSHattersleyAT.Heterogeneity in young adult onset diabetes: aetiology alters clinical characteristics. Diabet Med. 2002;19(9):758-761.
31.
PlowmanSASmithDL.Exercise Physiology for Health, Fitness and Performance. 2nd ed.New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
32.
ShaibiGQCruzMLBallGD. Effects of resistance training on insulin sensitivity in overweight Latino adolescent males. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(7):1208-1215.
33.
KahnRAlperinPEddyD. Age at initiation and frequency of screening to detect type 2 diabetes: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet. 2010;375(9723):1365-1374.
34.
NelsonMERejeskiWJBlairSN. Physical activity and public health in older adults: recommendation from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2007;116(9):1094-1105.
35.
AinsworthBEHaskellWLWhittMC. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(suppl 9):S498-504.
