Borzekowski DL, Rickert VI. Adolescent cybersurfing for health information: a new resource that crosses barriers. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155:813-817.
2.
Gimenez-Perez G, Gallach M, Acera E, et al. Evaluation of accessibility and use of new communication technologies in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J Med Internet Res [serial online]. 2002;4(3):E16. Available at: www.jmir.org. Accessed June 17, 2003.
3.
Bessell TL, McDonald S, Silagy CA, Anderson JN, Hiller JE, Sansom LN. Do Internet interventions for consumers cause more harm than good? A systematic review. Health Expect. 2002;5:28-37.
4.
US Department of Commerce. A nation online: how Americans are expanding their use of the Internet. National Telecommunications and Information Administration (DOC), 2002. Available at: www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/dn. Accessed June 17, 2003.
5.
Baker L, Wagner TH, Singer S, Bundorf MK. Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. JAMA. 2003;289:2400-2406.
6.
Murray E, Lo B, Pollack L, et al. The impact of health information on the Internet on the physician-patient relationship: patient perceptions. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1727-1734.
7.
Mortweet S, Robinson J, Howard C. What do you know? The impact of information on the management of type 1 diabetes in children [abstract]. Paper presented at: 60th Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association; 2000; San Antonio, Tex.
8.
Davison KP, Pennebaker JW, Dickerson SS. Who talks?: the social psychology of illness support groups. Am Psychol. 2000;55:205-217.
9.
Klemm P, Hurst M, Dearholt SL, Trone SR. Cyber solace: gender differences on Internet cancer support groups. Comput Nurs. 1999;17:65-72.
10.
Davison K, Pennebaker JW. Virtual narratives: illness representation in online support groups. In: Petrie KJ, Weinman JA, eds. Perceptions of Health and Illness: Current Research and Applications. United Kingdom: Harwood; 1997: 463-486.
11.
Gonder-Frederick LA, Cox DJ, Ritterband LM. Diabetes and behavioral medicine: the second decade. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002;70:611-625.
Ingersoll GM. Adolescent psychologic and social development. In: McAnarney E, Kriepe C, Orr DP, eds. Textbook on Adolescent Medicine. Philadelphia, Penn: WB Saunders; 1992:91-98.
14.
Christian BJ, D’Auria JP. The child’s eye: memories of growing up with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr Nurs. 1997;12:3-12.
15.
Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co; 1973.
16.
Merriam SB. Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. 2nd ed.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1998.
17.
Finfgeld DL. Therapeutic groups online: The good, the bad, and the unknown. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2000;21:241-255.
18.
Finn J. An Exploration of helping processes in an online self-help group focusing on issues of disability. Health Soc Work. 1999;24:220-231.
19.
Braithwaite DO, Waldron VR, Finn J. Communication of social support in computer-mediated groups for people with disabilities. Health Commun. 1999;11:123-151.
20.
Hanna KM, Juarez B, Lenss SS, Guthrie D. Parent-adolescent communication and support for diabetes management as reported by adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs. 2003;26:145-158.
21.
Sharf BF. Communicating breast cancer online: support and environment on the Internet. Women’s Health. 1997;26:65-84.
22.
Johnson KB, Ravert RD, Everton A. Hopkins Teen Central: assessment of an Internet based support system for children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatrics. 2001;107(2):E24. Available at: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org. Accessed October 16, 2003.
