Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this psychometric analysis was to (1) describe the functional health status of medically underserved persons with diabetes participating in an exercise program; (2) examine the relationships between functional health status scores and physiologic measures for blood pressure, heart rate, and blood glucose levels; and (3) examine the reliability and validity of the Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 survey.

METHODS

Data were collected from 31 men and women receiving diabetes disease management in a community-based nurse-managed clinic. The SF-36 survey was used to measure functional health status. Blood pressure, heart rate, and blood glucose also were measured (pretestlposttest).

RESULTS

The SF-36 survey had good internal consistency in the total sample. Blood pressure and blood glucose levels decreased significantly and heart rate increased significantly from pretest to posttest. Functional health status was negatively associated with physiological parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research is needed on the use of the SF-36 survey in medically underserved persons with diabetes because this instrument lacked construct validity as a measure of functional health status in this population.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1 Greenfield S. Evaluating Outcomes of Diabetes. Boston, Mass: Medical Outcomes Trust; 1997.

2. Blonde L , Dey J , Testa M , Guthrie R. Defining and measuring quality of diabetes care. Primary Care. 1999;26:. 841-855.

3. US Dept of Health and Human Resources . Closing the Gap: National Diabetes Education Program. Washington, DC: Office of Minority Health; 1999: 1-16.

4. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research . Research on Diabetes Care. Rockville, Md: US Dept of Health and Human: Services; 1999:1-2.

5. US Dept of Health and Human Services . Healthy People 2010: Final Report. Washington, DC: US Public Health Service; 2000.

6 US Dept of Health and Human Resources . Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities Initiatives. Washington, DC: Office of * Minority Health Resource Center; 1999:1-11.

7. West Virginia Bureau for Public Health . The Burden of Diabetes in West Virginia. Charleston, WV: Department of Health and Human Services; 1994.

8. West Virginia Health Care Authority . West Virginia State Health Plan. Charleston, WV: State Health Plan Advisory Group; 1999.

9. Stewart A , Hays R , Ware J. The MOS Short Form General Health Survey: reliability and validity in a patient population. Medical Care. 1988;26:724-735.

10.

10. Ware J , Stewart C. The MOS 36Item Short Form Health Survey: conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care. 1992;30:473-483.

11.

11. Bandura A. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1977.

12.

12. Allison KR , DwyerJJ , Makin S. Perceived barriers to physical activity among high school students. Prev Med. 1999;28:608-615.

13.

13. Elder J , Ayala G , Harris S. Theories and intervention approaches to healthbehavior change in primary care. Am J Prev Med. 1999;17:275-284.

14.

14. Kirsch I , Jungebelt A , Jenkins L , Kostand A. Adult Literacy in America. Washington, DC: US Office of Education, National Center for Education Statistics; 1993.

15.

15. McHorney C. Measuring and monitoring general health status in elderly persons: Practical and methodological issues in using the SF36 Health Survey. Gerontologist. 1996;36:571-583.

16.

16. McHorney C. Methodological and psychometric issues in health status assessment across populations and applications. In: Albrecht K , Fitzpatrick J , eds. Advances in Medical Sociology. Greenwich, Conn: JAI Press; 1994.

17.

17. McHorney C. Health status assessment methods for adults: past accomplishments and future challenges. Ann Rev Public Health. 1999;20:309-335.

18.

18. Polit D. Data Analysis and Statistics for Nursing Research. Stamford, Conn: Appleton & Lange; 1996.

19.

19. McHorney C , Kosinski M , Ware J. Comparisons of the cost and quality of norms for the SF36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey. Med Care. 1994; 32:551-551.

20.

20. Alwin D. Problems in the estimation and interpretations of the reliability of survey data. Quality Quantity. 1989;23:277-331.

21.

21. Snedecor G , Cochran W. Statistical Methods. 8th ed. Des Moines, Iowa: Iowa State University Press; 1989.

22.

22. Lynn M. Determination of quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35:382-385.

23.

23. Veneziano L , Hooper J. A method for quantifying content validity of health related questionnaires. Am J Health Behav. 1997;21:67-70.

24.

24. Wolinsky F , Wan G , Tierney W. Changes in the SF36 in 12 months in a clinical sample of disadvantaged older adults. Med Care. 1998;36:1589-1598.

25.

25. McHorney C , Ware J , Raczek A. The MOS 36Item ShortForm Health Survey (SF36): psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;3:247-263.

Functional Health Status of Persons With Diabetes in a Nurse-Managed Clinic

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References