A Comparison of Insulin Pen Use in the United States and the United Kingdom

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Williams G , Pickup JC . Handbook of Diabetes. 2nd ed. London, England: Blackwell Science; 1999.

2. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group . Xintensive blood glucose control with sulfonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998; 352:837-853.

3. Da Costa S. A co-ordinated approach to insulin transfer in the older, type 2 patient. J Diabetes Nurs. 1997;1:123-126.

4. Market research data. Indianapolis, Ind: Eli Lilly & Co; 2000.

5. Graff MR , McClanahan MA . Assessment by patients with diabetes mellitus of two insulin pen delivery systems versus vial and syringe. Clin Ther. 1998;20:486-496.

6. Ltief AN , Schwenk WF . Accuracy of pen injectors versus insulin syringes in children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999; 22:137-140.

7. Ginsberg BH , Parkes JL , Soaracino C. The kinetics of insulin administration by insulin pens. Horm Metab Res. 1994;26:584-587.

8. Tallroth G , Karlson B , Nilsson A , et al. The influence of different insulin regimens on quality of life and metabolic control in insulindependent diabetics. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1989;6:37.

9. Brown H , Dempsey C. Choosing the right insulin regime for optimal control. Commun Nurse. 2000; October.

10.

10. Hicks D. Modern Diabetes Management. London, England: Medical Education Partnership. In press.

11.

11. Watkins P , ed. Diabetes and Its Management. 5th ed. London, England: Blackwell Science; 1996.

12.

12. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group . The effects of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of longterm complications in insulindependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1983;329:977-986.