Recommendations of Dietitians for Overcoming Barriers to Dietary Adherence in Individuals With Diabetes

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purposes of this research were to (1) identify factors that contribute to the barriers to dietary adherence in individuals with diabetes identified in a 1998 study and (2) obtain recommendations from registered dietitians for strategies to overcome these barriers.

METHODS

A 10-item, open-ended telephone questionnaire was used to obtain information. The sample included 75 registered dietitians who participated in a previous survey to identify barriers and agreed to a follow-up telephone interview.

RESULTS

Of the 75 participants, 28% reported spending 5 hours or less per week counseling individuals with diabetes, 64% spent between 6 and 30 hours, and 8% spent more than 31 hours per week. Almost half of the participants (47%) were certified diabetes educators. Factors identified as the greatest contributors to the barriers being evaluated included lack of time, lack of symptoms, lack of education (including follow-up), poor self-esteem/lack of empowerment, and misinformation from family/peers/others with diabetes. The primary recommendations for overcoming each of these barriers included individualizing meal plans and planning ahead, teaching about complications, and setting obtainable goals.

CONCLUSIONS

The registered dietitians who were surveyed emphasized the importance of individualizing dietary counseling.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1. Diabetes facts and figures. American Diabetes Association (ADA) Web site. Available at: http://www.diabetes.org/ada/facts.asp. Accessed: January 11, 1999.

2. Anderson RM , Fitzgerald JT , Oh MS . The relationship between diabetes-related attitudes and patients' self-reported adherence. Diabetes Educ. 1993;19:287-292.

3. Anderson RM , Funnell MM , Butler PM , Arnold MS , Fitzgerald JT , Feste CC . Patient empowerment. Results of a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 1995;18:943-949.

4. Travis T . Patient perceptions of factors that affect adherence to dietary regimens for diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Educ. 1997;23:152-156.

5. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group . The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulindependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:977-986.

6. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group . The relationship of glycemic exposure to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Diabetes. 1995;44:968-983.

7. Vijan S , Hofer TP , Hayward RA . Estimated benefits of glycemic control in microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:788-795.

8. Klein R , Klein BE , Moss SE . Relation of glycemic control to diabetic microvascular complications in diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:90-96.

9. Edelman SV . Importance of glucose control. Med Clin North Am. 1998;82(4):665-687.

10.

10. Selby JV , Ray GT , Zhang D , Colby CJ . Excess costs of medical care for patients with diabetes in a managed care population. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:1396-1408.

11.

11. Glasgow RE , Toobert DJ , Hampson SE . Effects of a brief office-based intervention to facilitate diabetes dietary self-management. Diabetes Care. 1996;19:835-841.

12.

12. Tillotson LM , Smith MS . Locus of control social support, and adherence to the diabetes regimen. Diabetes Educ. 1996;22:133-139.

13.

13. Boehm S , Schlenk EA , Funnell MM , Powers H , Ronis DL . Predictors of adherence to nutrition recommendations in people with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Educ. 1997;23:157-165.

14.

14. Johnson EQ , Valera S . Medical nutrition therapy in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus improves clinical outcome. J Am Diet Assoc. 1995;95:700-701.

15.

15. Laitinen JH , Ahola IE , Sarkkinen ES , Winberg RL , Harmaakorpi-livonen PA , Uusitupa Ml . Impact of intensified dietary therapy on energy and nutrient intakes and fatty acid consumption on serum lipids in patients with recently diagnosed non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Am Diet Assoc. 1993;93:276-283.

16.

16. Campbell EM , Redman S . Moffitt PS, Sanson-Fisher RW. The relative effectiveness of educational and behavioral instruction programs on patients with NIDDM: a randomized trial. Diabetes Educ. 1996;22:379-386.

17.

17. Brown SL , Pope JF , Hunt AE , Tolman NM . Motivational strategies of dietitians counseling individuals with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Educ. 1998;24:313-318.

18.

18. Trudeau E , Dube L . Moderators and determinants of satisfaction with diet counseling for patients consuming a therapeutic diet. J Am Diet Assoc. 1995;95:34-39.

19.

19. Hintze JL . Number Cruncher Statistical System (NCSS) [computer program]. Kaysville, Utah: Author; 1995.

20.

20. Pendleton L , House WC , Parker LE . Physicians' and patients' views of problems of compliance with diabetes regimens. Public Health Reports. 1987;102:21-26.

21.

21. American Diabetes Association . Nutrition recommendations and principles for people with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1997;20:S14-S17.

22.

22. Ary DV , Toobert D , Wilson W , Glasgow RE . Patient perspective on factors contributing to nonadherence to diabetes regimen. Diabetes Care. 1986;9:168-172.

23.

23. Schlenk EA , Hart LK . Relationship between health locus of control, health value, and social support and compliance of persons with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1984;7:566-574.

24.

24. Meyer GR , Gates GE . Evaluation and comparison of the nutrition care process for persons with diabetes among inpatient and outpatient dietitians. Diabetes Educ. 1993;19:403-408.