ZwickerE.A model describing nonlinearities in hearing by active processes with saturation at 40 dB. Biol Cybern1979; 35:243–50.
2.
ZwickerE.A hardware cochlear nonlinear preprocessing model with active feedback. J Acoust Soc Am1986; 80:146–53.
3.
WiederholdML, KiangNYS. Effects of electric stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle on single auditory-nerve fibers in the cat. J Acoust Soc Am1970; 48:950–65.
4.
GuinanJJJr., GiffordML. Effects of electrical stimulation of efferent olivocochlear neurons on cat auditory-nerve fibers. III. Tuning curves and thresholds at CF. Hear Res1988; 37:29–46.
5.
BrownMC, NuttallAL. Efferent control of cochlear inner hair cell responses in the guinea pig. J Physiol (Lond)1984; 354:625–46.
6.
DolanDF, NuttallAL. Basilar membrane movement evoked by sound is altered by electrical stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle. Abs. 17th ARO Meeting, 1994; 356.
7.
MurugasuE, RussellIJ. The effect of efferent stimulation on basilar membrane displacement in the basal turn of the guinea pig cochlea. J Neurosci1996; 16:325–32.
8.
DallosP, HarrisD.Properties of auditory nerve responses in absence of outer hair cells. J Neurophysiol1978; 41:365–83.
9.
LibermanMC, DoddsLW. Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves. Hear Res1984; 16:55–74.
10.
KazeeAM, HanLY, SpongrVP, Synaptic loss in the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus correlates with sensorineural hearing loss in the C57BL/6 mouse model of presbycusis. Hear Res1995; 89:109–20.
11.
AshmoreJF. A fast motile response in guinea-pig outer hair cells: The cellular basis of the cochlear amplifier. J Physiol (Lond)1987; 388:323–47.
DallosP, HallworthR, EvansBN. Theory of electrically driven shape changes of cochlear outer hair cells. J Neurophysiol1993; 70:299–323.
14.
Santos-SacchiJ.Asymmetry in voltage-dependent movement of isolated outer hair cells from the organ of Corti. J Neurosci1989; 9:2954–62.
15.
ZennerHP, ZimmermannU, GitterAH. Fast motility of isolated mammalian auditory sensory cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun1987; 149:304–8.
16.
CanlonB, DulonD.Dissociation between the calcium-induced and voltage-driven motility in cochlear outer hair cells from the waltzing guinea pig. J Cell Sci1993; 104:1137–43.
DulonD, ZajicG, SchachtJ.Differential motile response of isolated inner and outer hair cells to stimulation by potassium and calcium ions. Hear Res1991; 52:225–32.
von BékésyG.Experiments in Hearing. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1960; 492–3.
21.
PatuzziR.Cochlear Micromechanics and Macromechanics, in DallosP, PopperAN, FayRR (eds): The Cochlea. New York, Springer, 1996; 194–5.
22.
DallosP, EvansBN, HallworthR.Nature of the motor element in electrokinetic shape changes of cochlear outer hair cells. Nature1991; 350:155–7.
23.
HallworthR, EvansBN, DallosP.The location and mechanism of electromotility in guinea pig outer hair cells. J Neurophysiol1993; 70:549–58.
24.
ForgeA.Structural features of the lateral walls in mammalian cochlear outer hair cells. Cell Tiss Res1991; 265:473–83.
25.
ForgeA, DaviesS, ZajicG.Assessment of ultrastructure in isolated cochlear hair cells using a procedure for rapid freezing before freeze-fracture and deep-etching. J Neurocytol1991; 20:471–84.
26.
HolleyMC, AshmoreJF. A cytoskeletal spring in cochlear outer hair cells. Nature1988; 335:635–7.
27.
HolleyMC, AshmoreJF. On the mechanism of a high-frequency force generator in outer hair cells isolated from the guinea pig cochlea. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol]1988; 232:413–29.
28.
HolleyMC, AshmoreJF. Spectrin, actin and the structure of the cortical lattice in mammalian cochlear outer hair cells. J Cell Sci1990; 96:283–91.
29.
HolleyMC, KalinecF, KacharB.Structure of the cortical cytoskeleton in mammalian outer hair cells. J Cell Sci1992; 102:569–80.
30.
KalinecF, HolleyMC, IwasaKH, A membrane-based force generation mechanism in auditory sensory cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA1992; 89:8671–5.
31.
DallosP, EvansBN. High-frequency motility of outer hair cells and the cochlear amplifier. Science1995; 267:2006–9.
32.
KolstonPJ. A faster transduction mechanism for the cochlear amplifier?Trends Neurosci1995; 18:427–9.
33.
de BoerE, de JonghHR. On cochlear encoding: potentialities and limitations of the reverse-correlation technique. J Acoust Soc Am1978; 63:115–35.
34.
RuggeroMA, RichNC. Furosemide alters organ of Corti mechanics: Evidence for feedback of outer hair cells upon the basilar membrane. J Neurosci1991; 11:1057–67.
35.
GummerAW, HemmertW, ZennerHP. Resonant tectorial membrane motion in the inner ear: 1st crucial role in frequency tuning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA1996; 92:8727–32.
36.
MammanoF, AshmoreJF. Reverse transduction measured in the isolated cochlea by laser Michelson interferometry. Nature1993; 365:838–41.
37.
PreyerS, RenzS, HemmertW, Receptor potential of outer hair cells isolated from base to apex of the adult guinea-pig cochlea: Implications for cochlear tuning mechanisms. Aud Neurosci1996; 2:145–57.
38.
Santos-SacchiJ.On the frequency limit and phase of outer hair cell motility: Effects of the membrane filter. J Neurosci1992; 12:1906–16.
39.
HousleyGD, AshmoreJF. Ionic currents of outer hair cells isolated from the guinea-pig cochlea. J Physiol (Lond)1992; 448:73–98.
40.
GoodyearR, HolleyM, RichardsonG.Visualization of domains in the avian tectorial and otolithic membranes with monoclonal antibodies. Hear Res1994; 80:93–104.
41.
HaskoJA, RichardsonGP. The ultrastructural organization and properties of the mouse tectorial membrane matrix. Hear Res1988; 35:21–38.
42.
KillickR, LeganPK, MalenczakC, Molecular cloning of chick β-tectorin, an extracellular matrix molecule of the inner ear. J Cell Biol1995; 129:535–47.
43.
Kronester-FreiA.The effect of changes in endolymphatic ion concentrations on the tectorial membrane. Hear Res1979; 1:81–94.
44.
LimDJ. Fine morphology of the tectorial membrane. Its relationship to the organ of Corti. Arch Otolaryngol1972; 96:199–215.
45.
RichardsonGP, RussellIJ, DuanceVC, Polypeptide composition of the mammalian tectorial membrane. Hear Res1987; 25:45–60.
46.
LimDJ. Cochlear anatomy related to cochlear micromechanics. A review. J Acoust Soc Am1980; 67:1686–95.
47.
RussellIJ, SellickPM. Low-frequency characteristics of intracellularly recorded receptor potentials in guinea-pig cochlear hair cells. J Physiol (Lond)1983; 338:179–206.
48.
RhodeWS, GeislerCD. Model of the displacement between opposing points on the tectorial membrane and reticular lamina. J Acoust Soc Am1967; 42:185–90.
49.
ZwislockiJJ. Active cochlear feedback: Required structure and response phase, in DallosP, GeislerCD, MatthewsJW, (eds): The Mechanics and Biophysics of Hearing. Heidelberg, Springer, 1990; 114–120.
50.
RussellIJ, KösslM, RichardsonGP. Nonlinear mechanical responses of mouse cochlear hair bundles. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol]1992; 250:217–27.
51.
de BoerE.Auditory physics: Physical principles in hearing theory. I. Phys Reports1980; 62:89–174.
52.
AllenJB. Cochlear micromechanics - A physical model of transduction. J Acoust Soc Am1980; 68:1660–70.
53.
AllenJB, NeelyST. Micromechanical models of the cochlea. Phys Today1992; 40–47.
54.
MammanoF, NobiliR.Biophysics of the cochlea: Linear approximation. J Acoust Soc Am1993; 93:3320–32.
55.
NeelyST, KimDO. A model for active elements in cochlear biomechanics. J Acoust Soc Am1986; 79:1472–80.
56.
ShambaughGE. A restudy of the minute anatomy of structures in the cochlea with conclusions bearing on the solution of the problem of tone perception. Am J Anat1907; 7:245–59.
57.
ZwislockiJJ. Five decades of research on cochlear mechanics. J Acoust Soc Am1980; 67:1679–85.
58.
ZwislockiJJ. Analysis of cochlear mechanics. Hear Res1986; 22:155–69.
59.
ZwislockiJJ, KletskyEJ. Tectorial membrane: A possible effect on frequency analysis in the cochlea. Science1979; 204:639–41.
60.
AllenJB, FaheyPF. A second cochlear-frequency map that correlates distortion product and neural tuning measurements. J Acoust Soc Am1993; 94:809–16.
61.
BrownAM, GaskillSA, WilliamsDM. Mechanical filtering of sound in the inner ear. Proc R Soc Lond [Biol]1992; 250:29–34.
62.
PatuzziRB, YatesGK, JohnstoneBM. Outer hair cell receptor current and sensorineural hearing loss. Hear Res1989; 42:47–72.
63.
PreyerS, GummerAW. Nonlinearity of mechanoelectrical transduction of outer hair cells as the source of nonlinear basilar-membrane motion and loudness recruitment. Aud Neuro-Otol1996; 1:3–11.
64.
NilsenKE, RussellIJ. The distribution of the cochlear amplifier along the basilar membrane of the guinea pig cochlea, in: 33rd Workshop on Inner Ear Biology, August 31 - September 3, 1996, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Abstract Book. Kugler Publications, Amsterdam, 1996; 54.
65.
SoucekS, MichaelsL, FrohlichA.Evidence for hair cell degeneration as the primary lesion in hearing loss of the elderly. J Otolaryngol1986; 15:175–183.
66.
DallosP.The active cochlea. J Neurosci1992; 12:4575–85.
67.
PatuzziR.Otoacoustic emissions and the categorization of cochlear and retro-cochlear lesions. Br J Audiol1993; 27:91–5.
68.
ZennerHP, ErnstA.Cochlear-motor, transduction and signal-transfer tinnitus: Models for three types of cochlear tinnitus. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol1993; 249:447–54.
69.
TasakiI, SpyropoulosCS. Stria vascularis as source of endocochlear potential. J Neurophysiol1959; 22:149–55.
70.
SaltAN, MelicharI, ThalmannR.Mechanisms of endocochlear potential generation by stria vascularis. Laryngoscope1987; 97:984–91.
71.
WangemannP, LiuJ, MarcusDC. Ion transport mechanisms responsible for K+ secretion and the transepithelial voltage across marginal cells of stria vascularis in vitro. Hear Res1995; 84:19–29.
72.
DavisH.A model for transducer action in the cochlea. Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol1965; 30:180–90.
73.
DallosP.Some electrical circuit properties of the organ of Corti. I. Analysis without reactive elements. Hear Res1983; 12:89–119.
74.
PikeDA, BosherSK. The time course of the strial changes produced by intravenous furosemide. Hear Res1980; 3:79–89.
75.
SewellWF. The effects of furosemide on the endocochlear potential and auditory-nerve fiber tuning curves in cats. Hear Res1984; 14:305–14.
76.
WatanabeY, NakashimaT, YanagitaN.The influence of acute venous congestion on the guinea pig cochlea. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol1990; 247:161–4.
77.
CanlonB.Acoustic overstimulation alters the morphology of the tectorial membrane. Hear Res1987; 30:127–34.
78.
EpsteinJE, CotancheDA. Secretion of a new basal layer of tectorial membrane following gentamicin-induced hair cell loss. Hear Res1995; 90:31–43.
79.
ShahDM, FreemanDM, WeissTF. The osmotic response of the isolated, unfixed mouse tectorial membrane to isosmotic solutions: Effect of Na+, K+, and Ca2+ concentration. Hear Res1995; 87:187–207.
80.
FreemanDM, CotancheDA, EhsaniF, The osmotic response of the isolated tectorial membrane of the chick to isosmotic solutions: Effect of Na+, K+, and Ca2+ concentration. Hear Res1994; 79:197–215.
81.
HardestyI.On the nature of the tectorial membrane and its probable role in the anatomy of hearing. Am J Anat1908; 8:109–88.
82.
Kronester-FreiA.Ultrastructure of the different zones of the tectorial membrane. Cell Tiss Res1978; 193:11–23.
83.
AdlerHJ, SaundersJC. Hair cell replacement in the avian inner ear following two exposures to intense sound. J Neurocytol1995; 24:111–16.
84.
AdlerHJ, PojeCP, SaundersJC. Recovery of auditory function and structure in the chick after two intense pure tone exposures. Hear Res1993; 71:214–24.
85.
AdlerHJ, MantoothJ, RaphaelY.Comparative analysis of patch lesions in the chick inner ear following acoustic trauma: Optical versus scanning electron microscopy. Scanning Microsc1995; 9:825–31.
86.
CotancheDA. Regeneration of the tectorial membrane in the chick cochlea following severe acoustic trauma. Hear Res1987; 30:197–206.
87.
CotancheDA. Video-enhanced DIC images of the noise-damaged and regenerated chick tectorial membrane. Exp Neurol1992; 115:23–6.
88.
TrautweinP, SalviRJ, MillerK, Incomplete recovery of chicken distortion product otoacoustic emissions following acoustic overstimulation. Audiol Neurootol1996; 1:86–103.
89.
CanlonB.The effect of acoustic trauma on the tectorial membrane, stereocilia, and hearing sensitivity: Possible mechanisms underlying damage, recovery, and protection. Scand Audiol Suppl1988; 27:1–45.
90.
AdlerHJ. Tectorial membrane repair in the quail following multiple exposures to intense sound. Audiol Neurootol1996; 1:65–79.
91.
NiemiecAJ, RaphaelY, MoodyDB. Return of auditory function following structural regeneration after acoustic trauma: Behavioral measures from quail. Hear Res1994; 79:1–16.
92.
SaundersSS, SalviRJ. Pure tone masking patterns in adult chickens before and after recovery from acoustic trauma. J Acoust Soc Am1995; 98:1365–71.
93.
SaundersSS, SalviRJ, MillerKM. Recovery of thresholds and temporal integration in adult chickens after high level 525-Hz puretone exposure. J Acoust Soc Am1995; 97:1150–64.
94.
FroymovichO, RebalaV, SalviRJ, Long-term effect of acoustic trauma on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in chickens. J Acoust Soc Am1995; 97:3021–9.
95.
RubelEW, StoneJS. Stimulating hair cell regeneration: On a wing and a prayer. Nature Med1996; 2:1082–3.