AxelssonA., LewisC.The comparison of otoscopic findings and impedance measurements. Scand Audiol1976; 5: 149–55.
3.
TosM., HvidG., StangerupS.E., AndreassenU.K.Prevalence and progression of sequelae following secretory otitis, in Bluestone CD, Casselbrant ML, Scheetz MD (eds.): Workshop on epidemiology of otitis media. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol1990; 99: (Suppl 149) 13–14.
4.
EaglesE.L., WishikS.M., DoerflerL.G., MelnickW., LevineH.S.Hearing sensitivity and related factors in children.University of Pittsburgh, Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, 1963.
5.
RobertsJ., FedericoJ.V.Hearing sensitivity and related medical findings among children. Vital Health Stat1972; 11: No 114.
6.
RobertsJ., AhujaE.M.Hearing sensitivity and related medical findings among youths 12–17 years. Vital Health Stat1975; 11: No 154.
KarmaP., SipiläM., KokkoE.Long-term results of tympanostomy treatment in chronic secretory otitis media. Acta Otolaryngol1982; (Suppl 386) 163–5.
9.
ValtonenH.Tympanostomy in treatment of young children with recurrent acute or secretory otitis media. A prospective five-year follow-up study. Dissertation. University of Kuopio, Kuopio, Finland, 1993.
10.
MawsonS.R., FaganP.F.Tympanic effusion in children. Long-term results of treatment by myringotomy, aspiration and indwelling tubes (grommets). J Laryngol Otol1972; 86: 105–9.
11.
HaapaniemiJ.J., SuonpääJ.T., SalmivalliA.J., TuominenJ.The influence of tympanic membrane findings on audiometric and immittance findings in school-aged children. Scand Audiol1995; (in press).