BenedettiL. H., & LoebM. (1972). A comparison of auditory monitoring performance in blind subjects with that of sighted subjects in light and dark. Perception & Psychophysics, 11, 10–16.
2.
CarpenterP. A., & EisenbergP. (1978). Mental rotation and the frame of reference in blind and sighted individuals. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 117–124.
3.
De BeniR., & CornoldiC. (1985). The effects of imaginal mnemonics on congenitally total blind and on normal subjects. In MarksD. F. & RussellD. G. (Eds.), Imagery1 (pp. 56–59). Dunedin, New Zealand: Human Performance Associates.
4.
De BeniR., & CornoldiC. (1988). Imagery limitation in totally congenitally blind subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14, 650–655.
5.
JonidesJ., KahanR., & RozinP. (1975). Imagery instructions improve memory in blind subjects. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 5, 424–426.
6.
PaivioA., ClarkJ. M., & KhanM. (1988). Effects of concreteness and semantic relatedness on composite imagery ratings and cued recall. Memory and Cognition, 16, 422–430.
7.
PaivioA., WalshM., & BonsT. (1994). Concreteness effects on memory: When and why? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 1196–1204.
8.
TintiC., CornoldiC., & MarscharkM., (1997). Modality-specific auditory imaging and the interactive imagery effect. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 417–436.