This article presents the results of a survey of 183 Latino family members of students with visual impairments. Although the family members expressed positive attitudes toward schools and teachers and believed that families need to be involved in the education of their children, they were not as positive about their ability to help their children in reading and math. Student variables associated with differences among respondents were age and reading mode, and variables specific to the respondents were language and educational level.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BartonD. (1983). Uncharted course: Mothering the blind child. Proceedings of the 1983 Helen Keller seminar “Blindness/Visual impairment: A family affair” (pp. 16–19). New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
2.
DauberS. L., & EpsteinJ. L. (1989). Parents’ attitudes and practices of involvement in inner-city elementary and middle schools.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Center for Research on Elementary and Middle Schools.
3.
DeitzS. J., & FerrellK. A. (1994). Research notes: Project PRISM, a national collaborative study on the early development of children with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 88, 470–472.
4.
Delgado-GaitánC. (1992). Involving parents in the schools: A process of empowerment. American Journal of Education, 100, 20–46.
5.
Dote-KwanJ. (1991). The relationship between early experiences and the development of young children with visual impairments. (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 1991). Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 5203A.
6.
EpsteinJ. L. (1992). School and family partnership project: Parent survey.Baltimore: Center on Families, Communities, Schools and Children's Learning, Johns Hopkins University.
7.
EpsteinJ. L., ConnorsL. J., & SalinasK. C. (1993). School and family partnerships: Parent survey.Baltimore: Center on Families, Communities, Schools and Children's Learning, Johns Hopkins University.
8.
FraibergS. (1974). Blind infants and their mothers: An examination of the sign system. In LewisM. & RosenblumL. S. (Eds.), The effect of the infant on its caregiver (pp. 215–232). New York: John Wiley & Son.
9.
FraibergS. (1977). Insights from the blind.New York: Basic Books.
10.
GallegosA., & GallegosR. (1988). The interaction between families of culturally diverse handicapped children and the school. In GarciaH. S. & ChavezR. Chavez (Eds.), Ethnolinguistic issues in education (pp. 125–132). (ERIC Document Reproductive Service No. ED316044)
11.
HancockK., WilgoshL., & McDonaldL. (1990). Parenting a visually impaired child: The mother's perspective. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 84, 411–413.
12.
HarryB. (1992). Making sense of disability: Low-income Puerto Rican parents’ theories of the problem. Exceptional Children, 59, 27–40.
13.
HayesK. G. (1992). Attitudes toward education: Voluntary and involuntary immigrants from the same families. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 23, 250–267.
14.
KekelisL. S., & AndersenE. S. (1983). Family communication styles and language development. Proceedings of the 1983 Helen Keller seminar “Blindness/Visual impairment: A family affair” (pp. 6–15). New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
15.
KleinB., Van HasseltV. B., TrefelnerM., SandstromD. J., & Brandt-SnyderP. (1988). The parent and toddler training project for visually impaired and blind multihandicapped children. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 82, 59–64.
16.
LynchE. W., & SteinR. C. (1987). Parent participation by ethnicity: A comparison of Hispanic, Black and Anglo families. Exceptional Children, 54, 105–111.
17.
MarínG., & VanOss MarínB. (1991). Research with Hispanic populations (Applied Social Research Methods Series, Vol. 23). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18.
MaryN. L. (1990). Reactions of Black, Hispanic, and White mothers to having a child with handicaps. Mental Retardation, 28, 1–5.
19.
NixonH. L. (1988). Reassessing support groups for parents of visually impaired children. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 82, 271–278.
20.
NixonH. L. (1991). Mainstreaming and the American dream: Sociological perspectives on parental coping with blind and visually impaired children.New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
21.
PowellR. D. (1995). Including Latino fathers in parent education and support programs: Development of a program model. In ZambranaR. E. (Ed.), Understanding Latino families (pp. 85–105). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
StolarskiV. S. (1991). Stress levels experienced by family members of visually impaired and multihandicapped–visually impaired children. (Doctoral dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1991). Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 878A.
23.
StotlandJ. (1983). Relationship of parent to professionals: A challenge to professionals. Proceedings of the 1983 Helen Keller seminar “Blindness/Visual impairment: A family affair” (pp. 19–24). New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
24.
Torres-GuzmánM. (1991). Recasting frames: Latino parent involvement. In McGroartyM. E. & FaltisC. J. (Eds.), Languages in school and society: Politics and pedagogy (pp. 529–552). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
25.
ValdésG. (1996). Con respeto: Bridging the distances between culturally diverse families and school.New York: Teachers College Press.
26.
WernerO., & CampbellD. T. (1970). Translating, working through interpreters and the problem of decentering. In R. N. & CohenR. (Eds.), A handbook of methods in cultural anthropology.New York: American Museum of Natural History.
