This article reports on a study of 116 certified teachers of students with visual impairments who responded to a questionnaire containing a teacher-efficacy scale, a hypothetical case report, and questions about the teachers. The study found that a teacher's current job placement was the most distinctive teacher variable affecting the teacher's placement recommendations for students. Other teacher variables that influenced these recommenations were type of community, teaching efficacy, and years of teaching experience in a specific setting.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AhearnE. M. (Ed.). (1997). Policy forum report: Training educators for work with students who are blind or visually impaired.Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Directors of Special Education.
2.
BishopV. E. (1990). Educational placement decision-making: An ecological model. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 84, 350–353.
3.
CabreraA. F. (1994). Logistic regression analysis in higher education: An applied perspective. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Handbook of higher education: Theory and research (pp. 225–256). New York: Agathons Press.
4.
CornA. L., HatlenP., HuebnerK.M., RyanF., & SillerM. A. (1996). The national agenda for the education of children and youths with visual impairments, including those with multiple disabilities.New York: AFB Press.
5.
GibsonS., & DemboM. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 569–582.
6.
HeumannJ., & HehirT. (1995). Policy guidance on educating blind and visually impaired students. Unpublished manuscript, U.S. Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Washington, DC.
7.
HatlenP. (1996). The core curriculum for blind and visually impaired students, including those with additional disabilities. RE:view, 28, 25–32.
8.
McIntyreL. L. (1988). Teacher gender: A predictor of special education referrals? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 382–383.
9.
MeijerC. J. W., & FosterS. F. (1988). The effect of teacher self-efficacy on referral chance. Journal of Special Education, 22, 378–385.
10.
NorusisM. J. (1992). SPSS/PC+ advanced statistics version 5.0.Chicago: SPSS.
11.
PodellD. M., & SoodakL. C. (1993). Teacher efficacy and bias in special education referrals. Journal of Educational Research, 86, 247–253.
12.
PotterM. L., YsseldykeJ. E., ReganR. R., & AlgozzineB. (1983). Eligibility and classification recommendations in educational settings: Issuing “passports” in a state of confusion. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 146–157.
13.
RoncekD. W. (1991). Using logit coefficients to obtain the effect of independent variables on changes in probabilities. Social Forces, 70, 509–518.
14.
SilbermanR. K., CornA. L., & SowellV. (1996a). Personnel preparation [Research Note]. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 90, 438–440.
15.
SilbermanR. K., CornA. L., & SowellV. (1996b). Teacher educators and the future of personnel preparation programs for serving students with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 90, 115–124.
16.
SoodakL. C., & PodellD. M. (1993). Teacher efficacy and student problem as factors in special education referral. Journal of Special Education, 27, 66–81.
17.
TobiasS., ColeC., ZibrinM., & BodlakovaV. (1982). Teacher-student ethnicity and recommendations for special education referrals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 72–76.
