This article reviews the research related to the definition of literacy and the comparability of various reading media and their implications for the vocational assessment of the literacy skills of visually impaired adults. It suggests that the characteristics of literacy, together with the media and working methods used in criterion situations, are represented in assessment tasks. It also recommends the review of the content validity of literacy tests to ensure that they reflect the literacy demands of adults who are visually impaired.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Committee to Develop Guidelines on Literacy. (1991). Selecting appropriate learning media for visually handicapped students. RE:view, 23(2), 64–66.
2.
CornA., & RyserG. (1989). Access to print for students with low vision. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 83, 340–349.
3.
EfronJ. R., & GibsonJ. (1981). Modification and development of proficiency tests for visually handicapped senior high school students. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 75, 286–291.
4.
GlueckaufR. L., SechrestL. B., BondG. R., & McDonelE. C. (1993). Improving assessment in rehabilitation and health.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5.
HeathS. B. (1980). The functions and uses of literacy. Journal of Communication, 30, 123–135.
6.
HjelmquistE., DahlstrandU., & HedelinL. (1992). Visually impaired persons’ comprehension of text presented with speech synthesis. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 86, 426–428.
7.
KirchnerC., JohnsonG., & HarkinsD. (1997). Research to improve vocational rehabilitation: Employment barriers and strategies for clients who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 91, 377–392.
8.
KirschI., & GuthrieJ. T. (1977). The concept and measurement of functional literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 13, 485–507.
9.
KoenigA. J. (1992). A framework for understanding the literacy of individuals with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 86, 277–284.
10.
KoenigA. J., LaytonC. A., & RossD. B. (1992). The relative effectiveness of reading in large print and with low vision devices for students with low vision. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 86, 48–53.
11.
McCallS., & McLindenM. (1997). Towards an inclusive model of literacy for people who are blind and who have additional learning difficulties. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 15, 117–121.
12.
McFallR. M. (1993). The essential role of theory in psychological assessment. In GlueckaufR. L., SechrestL. B., BondG. R., & McDonelE. C. (Eds.) Improving assessment in rehabilitation and health. Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
13.
MikuleckyL. (1982). Job literacy: The relationship between school preparation and workplace actuality. Reading Research Quarterly, 17, 400–419.
14.
MikuleckyL. (1990). Literacy for what purpose? In VenezkyR. L., WagnerD. A., & CilibertiB. S. (Eds.), Towards defining literacy.Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
15.
NesterM. A. (1984). Employment testing for handicapped persons. Public Personnel Management Journal, 13, 417–434.
16.
ReidJ. M. V. (1994). Assessing the numeracy and literacy skills of visually impaired adults. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 12, 60–62.
17.
ReidJ. M. V. (1995). Assessing the verbal and nonverbal ability of visually impaired adults. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 13, 12–14.
18.
SloanL. L., & HabelA. (1973). Reading speeds with textbooks in large and in standard print. Sight Saving Review, 43, 107–111.
19.
VenezkyR. L. (1990). Definitions of literacy. In VenezkyR. L., WagnerD. A., & CilibertiB. S. (Eds.), Towards defining literacy (pp. 2–16). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
