This study investigated the degree to which code switching was operative in the performances of skilled and less skilled readers of musical and literary braille on two tasks that required the identification of characters shared by the two codes in the auditory and tactile modalities. In both modalities, skilled readers were significantly faster and more accurate than less skilled readers. The results suggest that the less skilled readers’ inferior performances on tasks of code switching may have been due to inefficient verbal processing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsM.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
BentleyA. (1985). Measures of musical abilities.Slough, England: NFER Publishing Company.
3.
BlissJ.C., & CraneH.D. (1969). Tactile perception.American Foundation for the Blind Research Bulletin, 19, 269–274.
4.
BoyerA.S. (1987). Blindness and musical perception. Unpublished master's thesis, City University, London.
5.
BoyerA.S. (1991). Shared representations in the braille system: Blind children's reading of the literary and musical codes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern UniversityEvanston, IL.
6.
CornA.L., & BaileyG.L. (1991). Profile of music programs at residential schools for blind and visually impaired students.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 85, 379–382.
7.
DanemanM. (1988). How reading braille is both like and unlike reading print.Memory and Cognition, 6, 252–255.
8.
DeGarmoM.T. (1974). Introduction to braille music transcriptions.Washington, DC: National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped.
9.
DeutschD. (1982). The psychology of music.New York: Academic Press.
10.
FoulkeE. (1983). Reading braille. In SchiffW., & FoulkeE. (Eds.), Tactual perception: A source book (pp. 168–208). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
11.
FrancesR. (1988). The perception of music.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
12.
HampE.P., & CatonH. (1984). A fresh look at the sign system of the braille code.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 78, 210–214.
13.
LoomisJ. (1981). On the tangibility of letters and braille.Perception and Psychophysics, 29(1), 37–46.
14.
LorimerJ. (1962). Lorimer Braille Recognition Test: A test of ability in reading braille contradictions.Bristol, England: Royal School for the Blind.
15.
LorimerJ. (1977). Neale Analysis of Reading Ability: Adapted for use with the blind.Slough, England, NFER.
16.
MillarS. (1978). Short-term serial tactual recall: Effects of grouping on factually probed recall of braille letters and nonsense shapes by blind children.British Journal of Psychology, 69, 17–24.
17.
NewlandT. (1971). The Blind Learning Aptitude Test.Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
18.
NolanC., & KederisC. (1969). Perceptual factors in braille word recognition.New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
19.
PerfettiC. (1991). Representations and awareness in the acquisition of reading competence. In RiebenL., & PerfettiC.A. (Eds.), Learning to read: Basic research and its implications (pp. 33–46). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20.
PerfettiC., & RothS. (1982). Some of the interactive processes in reading and their role in reading skill. In PerfettiC., & LesgoldA. (Eds.), Interactive processes in reading (pp. 269–297). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
PringL. (1985). Processes involved in braille reading.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 79, 252–255.
22.
PringL. (1986). Orthographic effects of print in the auditory modality.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 80, 993–990.
