In this qualitative research, case study interviews were conducted to provide an in-depth examination of the meaning of braille in the lives of eight legally blind adults. Issues of self-esteem, self-identity, and the “stigma” of being a person with a disability were found to be integrally intertwined with the subjects’ expressed feelings about braille.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Printing House for the Blind. (1963). Distribution of January 7, 1963 quota registrations by school grades, and braille and large type reading.Louisville, KY: Author.
2.
American Printing House for the Blind. (1994). Distribution of federal quota based on the January 3, 1994 registration of eligible students.Louisville, KY: Author.
3.
American Printing House for the Blind. (1995). Distribution of federal quota based on the January 2, 1995 registration of eligible students.Louisville, KY: Author.
4.
BarragaN.C. (1976). Utilization of low vision in adults who are severely visually handicapped.New Outlook for the Blind, 70(5), 177–181.
5.
CatonH. (Ed.). (1991). Print and braille literacy: Selecting appropriate learning media.Louisville, KY: American Printing House for the Blind.
6.
DelamontS. (1992). Fieldwork in educational settings: Methods, pitfalls and perspectives.London: Falmer Press.
7.
EckartM.L. (1988). Correlates of self-esteem in adolescents with spina bifida. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cincinnati.
8.
FrankG. (1988). Beyond stigma: Visibility and self-empowerment of persons with congenital limb deficiencies.Journal of Social Issues, 44, 95–115.
9.
GlaserB.G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory.Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
10.
GlaserB.G., & StraussA.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.Chicago: Aldine.
11.
GoetzJ.P., & LeCompteM.D. (1982). Problems of reliability and validity in ethnographic research.Review of Educational Research, 52(1), 31–60.
12.
GoffmanE. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
HegerF.E. (1964). The comparative roles of braille and the Talking Book in the adult lives of a group of former braille students.Dissertation Abstracts International, 25(2), 1004 (University Microfiche No. 64–8168).
15.
HuebnerK.M. (1989). Daily uses of braille as told by four adult braille users.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 83, 308–309.
16.
HughesC.C. (1979). A comparison of braille and compressed speech as learning modes for legally blind adults.Dissertation Abstracts International, 41(04A), 1532.
17.
JerniganK. (1988, September–October). A thought-provoking resolution and an issue which is not yet settled.Braille Monitor, pp. 462–465.
18.
KirchnerC. (1988). Data on blindness and visual impairment in the U.S.: A resource manual on social demographic characteristics, education, employment and income, and service delivery (2nd ed.). New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
19.
KirchnerC., McBroomL.W., NelsonK.A., & GravesW.H. (1992). Lifestyles of employed legally blind people: A study of expenditures and time use.Mississippi State: Mississippi State University Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Blindness and Low Vision.
20.
LincolnY.S., & GubaE.G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry.Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
21.
LindeckerR.C. (1981). A comparison of braille and Optacon reading comprehension in seven blind public school students.Dissertation Abstracts International, 42(06A), 2613.
22.
MackC. (1984). How useful is braille? Reports of blind adults.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 78, 311–313.
23.
MerriamS.B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
MilesM.B., & HubermanA.M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
25.
National Library Service for the Blind and Physically Handicapped. (1983). Braille reader survey: Survey findings.Washington, DC: Author.
26.
PierceB. (1991, July-August). APH figures show braille still declining.Braille Monitor, 390–391.
27.
RexE.J. (1989). Issues related to literacy of legally blind learners.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 83, 306–313.
28.
RosenbergM. (1979). Conceiving the self.New York: Basic Books.
29.
ScheerJ., & GraceN. (1988). Impairment as a human constant: Cross-cultural and historical perspectives on variation.Journal of Social Issues, 44(1), 23–37.
30.
ShapiroJ.P. (1993). No pity: People with disabilities forging a new civil rights movement.New York: Times Books.
31.
SkilbeckM. (1990). Braille literacy. DORS Openers.Springfield: Illinois Department of Rehabilitation Services.
32.
SmithG., & BalinA. (1989). Perspective on braille.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 83, 314–316.
33.
SpunginS. (1989). Braille literacy: Issues for blind persons, families, professionals, and producers of braille.New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
34.
StephensO. (1989). Braille—Implications for living.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 83, 288–289.
TuttleD.W. (1974). A comparison of three reading media for the blind: Braille, normal recording, and compressed speech.AFB Research Bulletin, 27, 217–230.
37.
WittensteinS.H. (1994). Braille literacy: Pre-service training and teachers’ attitudes.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 88, 516–524.
38.
WrightB.A. (1983). Physical disability: A psychosocial approach (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
