This article presents a theoretical perspective on the economic aspects of disability that acknowledges that cultural value systems affect the definition of costs. It also illustrates the need for better measures of productive activity by persons with disabilities in paid and unpaid work; other personal characteristics that may account for dependence, such as old age or illness; and costs created by social barriers, rather than by impairments themselves.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ChiangY.P., BassiL.J., and JavittJ.C. (1992). Federal budgetary costs of blindness.Milbank Quarterly, 70, 319–340.
2.
JohnsonW., and BaldwinM. (1993). The Americans with Disabilities Act: Will it make a difference?Policy Studies Journal, 21, 775–788.
3.
KirchnerC. (Ed.). (1993). The politics of disability statistics [special issue].Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 4(2).
4.
KirchnerC., & Associates. (1988). Data on blindness and visual impairment in the United States (2nd ed.). New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
5.
KirchnerC., and HarkinsD. (1991, March). Study of issues and strategies toward improving employment of blind or visually impaired persons in Illinois. Unpublished report, American Foundation for the BlindNew York.
6.
KirchnerC., McBroomL., NelsonK., and GravesW. (1992). Lifestyles of employed legally blind people: A study of expenditures and time use.Mississippi State: Mississippi State University Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Blindness and Low Vision.
7.
McNeilJ. (1993). Americans with Disabilities, 1991–1992, Current Population Reports (Series P-70, no. 32). Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of theCensus.
8.
YoonC.K. (1995, February 7). Getting the feel of a long ago arms race, scientists at work: Geerat Vermeij.New York Times, pp. C1, C10.
