This article describes the physiological mechanisms involved in three-dimensional depth perception and presents a variety of distance and depth cues and strategies for detecting and estimating curbs and steps.
AppleL., & BlaschB. (1976). Report of the workshop on low vision mobility. Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, Nov. 3–5, 1975. Washington, DC: Veterans Administration, Department of Medicine and Surgery.
3.
AppleL., & MayN. (1971). Distance vision and perceptual training.New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
4.
BeliveauM., & SmithA. (1980). Training for visual efficiency without optical aids. In BeliveauM., & SmithA. (Eds.), The interdisciplinary approach to low vision rehabilitation (pp. 224–258). Stillwater: Oklahoma State University, National Clearing House of Rehabilitation Training Materials.
5.
BowerT. (1965). Stimulus variables determining space perception in infants. Science, 149, 38–89.
6.
BradyF. (1985). A singular view: The art of seeing with one eye (3rd ed.). Annapolis, MD: Author.
7.
CornA. (1980). Functional environmental cues for the low vision individual. In BeliveauM., & SmithA. (Eds.), The interdisciplinary approach to low vision rehabilitation (pp. 259–274). Stillwater: Oklahoma State University, National Clearing House of Rehabilitation Training Materials.
Division of Educational Program Development, Board of Public Education. (1977, November). Orientation and mobility.Pittsburgh, PA: Author.
10.
FlockH. (1964). Some conditions sufficient for accurate monocular perceptions of moving surface slants. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 560–572.
11.
GenenskyS., BerryS., BiksonT.H., & BiksonT.K. (1979). Visual environmental adaptation problems of the partially sighted: Final Report (CPS-100-HEW). Santa Monica: CA: Center for the Partially Sighted.
12.
GogelW. (1961). Convergence as a cue to absolute distance. Journal of Psychology, 52, 287–301.
13.
GrahamC. (1965). Visual space perception. In GrahamC. (Ed.); Vision and visual perception (pp. 504–547). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
14.
GrantV. (1942). Accommodation and convergence in visual space perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 89–104.
15.
GregoryR. (1978). Eye and brain: The psychology of seeing (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
16.
HeinemannE., TulvingE., & NachmiasJ. (1959). The effect of oculomotor adjustments on apparent size. American Journal of Psychology, 72, 32–45.
KunnapasT. (1968). Distance perception as a function of available visual cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 523–529.
19.
LeibowitzH., & MooreD. (1966). Role of changes in accommodation and convergence in the perception of size. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 56, 1120–1122.
20.
LongR. (1985). The relationship of visual behavior to mobility performance and beliefs in persons with low vision. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 501A.
21.
MorseK., & LeffardK. (1975). Mobility for the partially sighted (2nd ed.). Watertown, MA: Perkins School for the Blind.
22.
ParkJ. (1964). The role of motion parallax in depth perception (Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas). Dissertation Abstracts International, 26, 507 (University Microfilms, No. 65–7668).
23.
PettigrewJ. (1976). The neurophysiology of binocular vision. In R. Held & W. Richards (Introductions), Readings from Scientific American: Recent progress in perception (pp. 55–66). San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.
24.
RichardsW., & MillerJ. (1969). Convergence as a cue to depth. Perception & Psycho-physics, 5, 317–320.
SekulerR., & BlakeR. (1985). Perception.New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
27.
SmithA. (1987). Low vision orientation and mobility: Strategies for assessing and enhancing visual efficiency in the environment. In TeeC., NgW., OmarB., & FeeL. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st Asia-Pacific Seminar on Low Vision, Malaysia, 1986 (pp. 77–91). (Available from Malaysian Association for the Blind, Low Vision Committee, No. 2, Lorong Utara B, 46200 Petaling Jaya).
28.
SmithA. (1990). Mobility problems related to vision loss: Perception of mobility practitioners and persons with low vision. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, 1579. (University Microfilms No. 9026646.)
29.
SmithA., De l'AuneW., & GeruschatD. (1992). Low vision mobility problems: Perceptions of O&M specialists and persons with low vision. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 86, 58–62.
30.
SmithA., & O'DonnellL. (1991). Beyond arm's reach: Enhancing distance vision.Philadelphia: Pennsylvania College of Optometry Press.
31.
WalkR. (1968). Monocular compared to binocular depth perception in human infants. Science, 162, 473–475.
32.
WalkerJ. (1986). The hyperscope and the pseudoscope aid experiments on three-dimensional vision. Scientific American, 255, 134–138.
33.
WalkerS. (1975). Increasing ability of low vision clients to judge depth through training. Low Vision Abstracts, 2(2), 13.
34.
WallachH., & FloorL. (1971). The use of size matching to demonstrate the effectiveness of accommodation and convergence as cues for distance. Perception & Psycho-physics, 10, 423–428.
35.
WardellK. (1980). Environmental modifications. In WelshR., & BlaschB. (Eds.), Foundations of orientation and mobility (pp. 477–526). New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
