This article will focus on various myths associated with schools for students who are blind or visually impaired. These myths continue to persist even though these specialized schools have changed significantly in the past 20 years. While positive changes have occurred, many people's attitudes about them have not. As a result of these myths, some students and parents are not being afforded opportunities for services that may benefit the student in terms of short- or longer-term placements.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllmanC. (1991). A study of nine state residential schools serving sensory impaired children, Florida State Legislative Study.
2.
American Printing House for the Blind (1992). National study: Forecasting the futures of residential schools for the blind in the year 1991.
3.
BotkinK. (1992). Personal communication.
4.
BoyerC. (1989). Personal communication.
5.
CurryS.A., & HatlenP. (1988). Meeting the unique needs of visually impaired pupils through appropriate placements.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 82, 417–424.
6.
DaughertyW., & CaldwellM. (1987). Personal communication.
7.
DurstJ. (1992). Personal communication.
8.
EasterlingR. (1989). Personal communication.
9.
EnglishW. (1985). Personal communication.
10.
HapemanL. (1977). Reservations about the effect of P.L. 94–142 on the education of visually handicapped children.Education of the Visually Handicapped, 9(2), 32–36.
11.
HatlenP. (1989). Testimony for the California Joint Action Committee of Organizations of and for the Visually Handicapped at a hearing of the Office of Special Education Programs.
12.
Indiana Department of Education (1992). Statistical information.
13.
LairdE. (1992). Personal communication.
14.
McMahonE. (1992). The role of residential schools for the blind in 1990.RE:view.
15.
MaronS. (1978). P.L. 94–142 and the residential school: A rebuttal to Dr. Hapeman.Education of the Visually Handicapped., 9(4) 121–124.
16.
Office of Special Education Programs. (1992). Statistical data.Education of the Handicapped, 18, (15).
17.
TuttL. (1992). Personal communication.
18.
VincentL.Parent choice and empowerment: A commentary.RE:view, XXI, 3.