This article describes an assessment of the peripheral and central auditory functioning of eight blind subjects who were good obstacle detectors and eight sighted subjects. An echolocation paradigm in short latency-evoked response was included. The study found that the blind subjects were better (faster) than the sighted subjects in auditory processing and that the echolocation signals may be processed in the superior olivary complex of the midbrain.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmmonsC.H., WorchelP., & DallenbachK.M. (1953). Facial vision: The perception of obstacles out of doors by blindfolded and blindfolded-deafened subjects.American Journal of Psychology, 66, 519–553.
2.
AuW.W.L., & MartinD.W. (1989). Insights into dolphin sonar discrimination capabilities from human listening experiments.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86, 1662–1670.
3.
Bach-y-Rita (1973). Somatosensory evoked responses: Latency differences in blind and in sighted persons.Brain Research, 60, 219–223.
4.
BassettI.G., & EastmondE.J. (1964). Echolocation: Measurement of pitch versus distance for sounds reflected from a flat surface.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 36, 911–916.
5.
BilsenF.A. (1977). Pitch of noise signals: Evidence for a “central spectrum.”Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61, 150–161.
6.
BilsenF.A., & RitsmaR.J. (1969–70). Repetition pitch and its implications for hearing theory.Acustica, 22, 63–73.
7.
BilsenF.A., & RitsmaR.J. (1970). Some parameters influencing the perceptibility of pitch.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 47(2, Part 2), 469–475.
8.
BilsenF.A., FrietmanE.E.E., & WillemsW. (1980). Electroacoustic obstacle simulator (EOS) for the training of blind persons.International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 3, 527–564.
9.
CotzinM., & DallenbachK.M. (1950). Facial vision: The role of pitch and loudness in the perception of obstacles by the blind.American Journal of Psychology, 63, 485–515.
10.
CronbachL. (1960). Essentials of psychological testing (2nd ed.). New York: Harper & Bros.
11.
DallenbachK.M., SupaM., & CotzinM. (1944). Facial vision: The perception of obstacles by the blind.American Journal of Psychology, 53, 133–183.
12.
DiderotD. (1916). Letter on the Blind. In Early philosophical works (M. Jourdian trans., pp. 68–141). Chicago: Open Court Publishing Co. (Original work published 1749)
13.
DrakeR.M. (1954). Manual for Drake Musical Aptitude Tests.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
GriffinD.R. (1958). Listening in the dark.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
GriffinD.R. (1960). Ecos de murcièlagos y hombres.Buenos Aires, Argentina: Universitaria de Buenos Aires.
16.
GriffinD.R. (1967). Discriminative echolocation by bats. In BusnelR.G. (Ed.), Animal sonar systems: Biology and bionics (pp. 273–300). Jouy-en-Josas, France: Laboratoire de Physiologie Acoustique.
17.
HausfeldS., PowerR.P., GortaA., & HarrisP. (1982). Echo perception of shape and texture by sighted subjects.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55, 623–632.
18.
HermannL. (1912). Neu versuche zur frage der unterbrechungstone, mit einem anhang uber reflexionstone unsw.Archives of Physiology, 146, 249–294.
19.
JuurmaaJ. (1967). The ability structure of the blind and the deaf: Final report.American Foundation for the Blind Research Bulletin, 14, 109–122.
20.
KandelE.R. (1982). Synaptic transmission II: Presynaptic factors controlling transmitter release. In KandelE.R., & SchwartzJ.H. (Eds.), Principles of neural science (pp. 81–90). New York: Elsevier.
21.
KelloggW.N. (1962). Sonar system of the blind.Science, 137, 399–404.
22.
KohlerI. (1964). Orientation by aural clues.American Foundation for the Blind Research Bulletin, 4, 14–53.
23.
LeguireL.E., FellowsR.R., RogersG.L., BremerD.L., & FillmanR.D. (1992). The CCH vision stimulation program for infants with low vision: Preliminary results.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 86, 33–36.
24.
MillerL. (1992). Diderot reconsidered: Visual impairment and auditory compensation.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 86, 206–210.
25.
MooreB.C.J. (1977). Introduction to the psychology of hearing.London: Macmillan.
26.
NiemeyerW., & StarlingerI. (1981). Do the blind hear better? Investigations on auditory processing in congenital or early acquired blindness: II. Central functions.Audiology, 20, 510–515.
27.
NordmarkJ. (1963). Some analogies between pitch and lateralization phenomena.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 35, 1544–1547.
28.
PitmanD.J. (1965). The musical ability of blind children.American Foundation for the Blind Research Bulletin, 11, 673–79.
29.
RiceC.E. (1967). Human echo perception.Science, 156, 656–664.
30.
RiceC.E. (1969). Perceptual enhancement in the early blind?Psychological Record, 19, 1–14.
31.
RiceC.E. (1970). Early blindness, early experience and perceptual enhancement.American Foundation for the Blind Research Bulletin, 22, 1–22.
32.
RiceC.E., FeinsteinS.H., & SchustermanR.J. (1965). Echo detection ability of the blind: Size and distance factors.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 246–251.
33.
SchenkmanB. (1985). Human echolocation: the detection of objects by the blind. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Acta Universitatis UpsaliensisUppsala, Sweden.
34.
SimmonsJ.A., & ChenL. (1989). The acoustic basis for target discrimination by FM echolocating bats.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86, 1333–1350.
35.
StankovL., & SpilsburgG. (1978). The measurement of auditory abilities of blind, partially sighted and sighted children.Applied Psychological Measurements, 2, 491–503.
36.
StarlingerI., & NiemeyerW. (1981). Do the blind hear better? Investigations on auditory processing in congenital or early acquired blindness: I. Peripheral functions.Audiology, 20, 503–509.
37.
SugaN., & SchlegelP. (1973). Coding and processing in the auditory systems of FM-signal-producing bats.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 54, 1, 174–190.
38.
TerhardtE. (1970). Frequency analysis and periodicity detection in the sensation of roughness and periodicity pitch. In PlompR., & SmoorenburgG.F. (Eds.), Frequency analysis and periodicity detection in hearing (pp. 278–287). Leiden, the Netherlands: Sijthoff.
39.
TerhardtE. (1974). Pitch, consonance, and harmony.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55, 1061–1069.
40.
ThurlowW.L., & SmallA.M.Jr. (1955). Pitch perception for certain periodic auditory stimuli.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 132–137.
41.
WorchelP., & DallenbachK.M. (1947). Facial vision: Perception of obstacles by the deaf-blind.American Journal of Psychology, 60, 502–553.
42.
YostW. (1982). The dominance region and ripple noise pitch: A test of the peripheral weighting model.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 72, 416–425.
43.
YostW.A., & HillR. (1978). Strength of the pitches associated with ripple noise.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64, 485–492.
