Three groups of visually impaired persons (two middle aged and one old) were investigated with respect to memory and understanding of texts presented with speech synthesis and natural speech, respectively. The results showed that speech synthesis generally yielded lower results than did natural speech. Experience had no effect on performance, and there were only marginal effects related to age. However, there were big differences among the groups with respect to the presentation speed chosen in the speech-synthesis condition.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BäckmanL., MäntyläT., and HerlitzA. (1988, June 5–7). The optimization of episodic remembering in old age. Paper presented at the Conference on Longitudinal Research and the Study of Successful (Optimal) Aging, Schloss Ringberg, West Germany.
2.
BernsteinJ., and PisoniD.B. (1980). Unlimited text-to-speech system: Description and evaluation of a microprocessor based device.Proceedings of the IEEE, 68, 576–579.
3.
van BezooijenR. (1989, September 20–23). Evaluation of the suitability of Dutch text-to-speech conversion for application in a digital daily newspaper.Proceedings of ESCA Tutorial Day and Workshop on Speech Input/Output Assessment and Speech Databases.Noordwijkwehont, the Netherlands: European Speech Communication Association.
4.
van BezooijenR., PolsL. (1989, September 20–23). Evaluation of text-to-speech conversion for Dutch: From segment to text.Proceedings of ESCA Tutorial Day and Workshop on Speech Input/Output Assessment and Speech Databases.Noordwijkerhont, the Netherlands: European Speech Communication Association.
5.
CarlssonR., GranströmB., and LarssonK. (1976). Evaluation of text-to-speech system as a reading machine for the blind. STL-QPSR 2-3. Stockholm: The Royal Institute of Technology.
6.
GreenspanS.L., NusbaumA.C., and PisoniD.B. (1988). Perceptual learning of synthetic speech produced by rule.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 41–433.
7.
HjelmquistE. (1988). Daily newspapers for the visually handicapped.Scandinavian Public Library Quarterly, 21, 20–24.
8.
HjelmquistE., JanssonB., and TorellG. (1987). Psychological aspects of blind people's reading of radio-distributed daily newspapers. In KnaveB., & WidebäckP. G. (Eds.), Work with display units (pp. 187–210). Amsterdam, North-Holland.
9.
HjelmquistE., JanssonB., and TorellG. (1990). Blind persons’ reading of daily newspapers with computer mediated technique.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 17, 210–215.
10.
KinsbourneM., and BerryhillJ.L. (1972). The nature of the interaction between pacing and the age decrement in learning.Journal of Gerontology, 27, 471–477.
11.
KintschW. (1986). On modeling comprehension. In de CastellS., LukeA., EganK. (Eds.), Literacy, society, and schooling (pp. 175–195). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
12.
LoganJ.S., GreeneB.G., and PisoniD.B. (1989). Segmental intelligibility of synthetic speech produced by rate.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86, 566–581.
13.
PaivioA., and OkovitaH.W. (1971). Word imagery modalities and associative learning in blind and sighted subjects.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 506–510.
14.
PisoniD.B., and HunnicuttS. (1980). Perceptal evaluation of MITalk: The MIT unrestricted text-to-speech system.Proceedings of the IEEE, 68, 572–575.
15.
PisoniD.B., NusbaumH.C., and GreeneB.G. (1985). Perception of synthetic speech generated by rule.Proceedings of the IEEE, 73, 1665–1676.
16.
SchwabE.C., NusbaumH.C., and PisoniD.B. (1985). Some effects of training on the perception of synthetic speech.Human Factors, 27, 395–408.
