Persons who are deaf-blind are a heterogeneous group that require individualized rehabilitation and supported-living services to deal with their profound disabilities. This article discusses the factors that enhance the provision of high-quality services, transitional programs, and the importance of interagency collaboration in developing new services that can assist persons who are deaf-blind to live and work in their communities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarrettS. (1987). Trends and issues in developing community living programs for young adults who are deaf-blind and profoundly handicapped. In CovertA., FredericksB. (Eds.), Transition for persons with deaf-blindness and other profound handicaps (pp. 39–51). Monmouth, OR: Teaching Research Publications.
2.
BarrettS. (1988, June 17). Current issues and future trends in services to persons with deaf-blindness. Paper presented at the 12th Annual Convention of the American Association of the Deaf-Blind. Baton Rouge, LA.
3.
BellamyG.T., RhodesL., and AlbinJ.M. (1986). Supported employment. In KiernanW., StarksJ. (Eds.), Pathways to employment for developmentally disabled adults (pp. 129–138). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishers.
4.
CovertA.M., and CarrT. (Eds.) (1988). Value-based services for young adults with deaf-blindness.Sands Point, NY: Helen Keller National Center.
5.
EmersonE.B. (1985). Evaluating the impact of deinstitutionalization on the lives of mentally retarded people.American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 90, 227–288.
6.
EversonJ.M., and BurwellJ. (1991). Transition to work: Addressing the challenges of deaf-blindness.Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 1(4), 39–45.
7.
EversonJ.M., RachalP., and MichaelM. (1992). Interagency collaboration for young adults with deaf-blindness: Toward a common transition goal.Sands Point, NY: Helen Keller National Center.
8.
Federal Register. (1977). #96, pp. 42, 479.
9.
FillmanR.D.Considerations for serving adolescents with Usher's Syndrome.RE:view21(1), 19–25.
10.
HammesR. (1986). The necessity for the coordinated planning of special education, vocational-technical education, and vocational rehabilitation services. In BarrettS., SmithA. (Eds.), Employment options for young adults with deaf-blindness. (1–12). Sands Point, NY: Helen Keller National Center.
11.
Helen Keller National Center for Deaf-blind Youths and Adults (1991). Annual Report to Congress.
12.
JanickiM.P. (1981). Personal growth and community residence environments: A review. In HaywoodH.C., NewbroughJ.R. (Eds.), Living environments for developmental retarded persons (pp. 59–101). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
13.
KonarV., and RiceD. (1984). Strategies for serving deaf-blind clients. Paper presented at the 11th Institute on Rehabilitation Issues, University of ArkansasHot Springs.
14.
MarH.H. (1991). Deaf-blindness: Some causes and challenges. In Resources: Newsletter of California Deaf-Blind Services, 4, 4, 1.
15.
O'DonnellN. (1991). A report on a survey of late emerging manifestations of congenital rubella syndrome.Sands Point, NY: Helen Keller National Center.
16.
PumpianI. (1986). The evolution of supported employment. In BarrettS., SmithA. (Eds.), Employment options for young adults with deaf-blindness (pp. 228–252). Sands Point, NY: Helen Keller National Center.
17.
RomerL.T. (1987). Community-based residential options for persons with severe/multiple disabilities: Impact of services on people's lifestyles. In CovertA., FredericksH.D. (Eds.), Transition for persons with deaf-blindness and other profound handicaps: State of the art.Monmouth, OR: Teaching Research Publications.
18.
RuschF., and MithaugD. (1985). Competitive employment education: A systems-analytic approach to transitional programming for the student with severe handicaps. In LakinK., BruiniksR. (Eds.), Strategies for achieving community integration of developmentally disabled citizens (pp. 177–192). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishers.
19.
SeverJ., SouthM., and ShaverK. (1985). Delayed manifestations of congenital rubella.Reviews of Infectious Diseases, 7(Supp), 1.
20.
SowersJ. (1982). Validation of the weekly activity interview (WHI): An instrument designed to measure the lifestyle of severely handicapped secondary-age students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon.
21.
Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education, Annual Deaf-blind Child Count Data, 1991.
22.
SteinL., PalmerP., and WeinbergB. (1980). Characteristics of a young deaf-blind population.The Siegel Report, David T. Siegel Institute for Communicative DisordersChicago, Illinois.
23.
WehmanP., and MoonS. (1985). Critical values in employment programs for persons with developmental disabilities. In WehmanP., HillJ. (Eds.), Competitive employment for persons with mental retardation (pp. 2–19). Richmond: Virginia Commonwealth University Rehabilitation Research and Training Center.
24.
WolfensbergerW., and ThomasS. (1983). PASSING: (program analysis of service systems implementation of normalization goals): Normalization criteria and ratings manual (2nd Ed.). Toronto: National Institute on Mental Retardation.
25.
WynneB. (1980, June 25). The power of touch: Communication and education. Paper presented at Helen Keller Centennial Congress, Boston.
26.
WynneB. (1987). The population—Who are they? In BarrettS., CarrT., CovertA. (Eds.), Community-based living options for young adults with deaf-blindness: Philosophy, directions, and strategies.Sands Point, NY: Helen Keller National Center.
