This article reviews the history of and the theories behind the use of tactual maps by blind and visually impaired travelers. It discusses textual patterns, symbols, and graphics and the differences between conventional geographic-cartographic maps and strip maps used as navigational aids. Current advances include disposable, quick-to-produce, and easy-to-update strip maps, as well as devices for their production.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndrewsS. (1983). Spatial cognition through tactual maps. In WiedelJ. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Maps and Graphics for the Visually Handicapped. (pp. 30–40). Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.
2.
AndrewsS. (1985). The use of capsule paper in producing tactual maps.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 79, 396–399.
3.
AndrewsS. (1986). Issues regarding tactual map symbol standardization. Unpublished paper, University of MinnesotaMinneapolis.
4.
ArmstrongJ. (Ed.) (1973). The design and production of maps for the visually handicapped (Monograph No. 1). Nottingham, England: Blind Mobility Research Unit, University of Nottingham.
5.
BerlaE. (1973). Strategies in scanning a tactual pseudo-map.Education of the Visually Handicapped, 5, 8–19.
6.
CaseyM. (1978). Cognitive mapping by the blind.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 72, 297–301.
7.
DownsR., & SteaD. (1973). Cognitive maps and spatial behavior: Process and products. In DownsR., & SteaD. (Eds.), Image and environment (pp. 8–26). London: Arnold.
8.
FoulkeE. (1971). The perceptual basis for mobility.Research Bulletin of the American Foundation for the Blind, 23, 1–8.
9.
FoulkeE. (1982). Perception cognition and the mobility of blind pedestrians. In PotegalM. (Ed.), Spatial abilities—development and physiological foundations.New York: Academic Press.
10.
FranksF. (1974). Introduction to map study: Teaching locational and directional referents to young blind students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Peabody College for Teachers, Vanderbilt UniversityNashville, TN.
11.
FranksF. (1982). Introduction to map study II: Locating symbols on simple maps using locational and directional referents. Unpublished report, American Printing House for the BlindLouisville, KY.
12.
FranksF., & BairdR. (1971). Geographical concepts and the visually handicapped.Exceptional Children, 38, 321–324.
13.
FranksF., & GlassR. (1980). Audio-tutorial reference materials in biology (cell division: Final report). Louisville, KY: American Printing House for the Blind.
14.
FranksF., & HuffR. (1976). Educational materials development in primary sciences: Dial thermometer instructional unit.Education of the Visually Handicapped, 4, 120–124.
15.
FranksF., & MurrJ. (1978). Biological models for blind students.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 72, 121–124.
16.
GolledgeR., & FluryA. (1989, July 17–18). GIS for visually impaired people. Paper presented at the NCGIA Symposium on the Design and Implementation of Large Spatial Databases, University of California at Santa Barbara.
17.
GolledgeR., ParkesD., & DearR. (1989). NOMAD: An auditory-tactile information system for blind or vision impaired travellers. (NSF USA–Australian Cooperative Science Program, final report). Santa Barbara Department of Geography, University of California–Santa Barbara.
18.
GolledgeR., RivizzignoV., & SpectorA. (1976). Learning about a city: Analysis by multidimensional scaling. In GolledgeR., and RushtonG. (Eds.), Spatial choice and spatial behavior (pp. 95–118). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
19.
HeathW. (1958). Maps and graphics for the blind: Some aspects of the discriminability of textural surfaces for use in areal differentiation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
20.
KennedyJ. (1983). Pictoral displays and the blind: Elements, patterns, and metaphors. In WiedelJ. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Maps and Graphics for the Visually Handicapped (pp. 75–99). Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.
21.
KlatzkyR., LoomisJ., GolledgeR., CicinelliJ., DohertyS., & PellegrinoJ. (1990). Acquisition of route and survey knowledge in the absence of vision.Journal of Motor Behavior, 22, 19–43.
22.
MorrisJ. (1960). Discriminability of tactual patterns. Unpublished master's thesis, University of LouisvilleKY.
23.
MorrisJ., & NolanC. (1963). Minimum sizes for areal type tactual symbols.International Journal for the Education of the Blind, 13, 48–51.
24.
NolanC., & MorrisJ. (1971). Improvement of tactual symbols for blind children: Final report.Louisville, KY: American Printing House for the Blind.
25.
ParkesD., & DearR. (1989). User's manual for NOMAD.Newcastle, Australia: Institute for Behavioral Research, University of Newcastle.
26.
PearceD. (1983). Maps for the visually handicapped: A new window on the world. In WiedelJ. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Maps and Graphics for the Visually Handicapped (pp. 60–67). Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.
27.
PiagetJ., & InhelderB. (1967). The child's conception of space.New York: Norton.
28.
PreiserW. (1983). A combined tactile/electronic guidance system for the visually handicapped. In WiedelJ. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Maps and Graphics for the Visually Handicapped (pp. 86–89). Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.
29.
RieserJ. (1983). Environmental learning: Is it spatial or visual? Paper presented at the XIX Inter-American Congress of Psychology, Quito, Ecuador.
30.
RieserJ., GuthD., & HillW. (1982). Mental processes mediating independent travel: Implications for orientation and mobility.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 76, 213–218.
31.
ShemyakinF. (1962). Orientation in space. In Anan'yevB. (Eds.), Psychological science in the USSR, 1 (Report No. 62-11083, pp. 184–225). Washington, DC: Office of Technical Services.
32.
SiegelA., & WhiteS. (1975). The development of spatial representations of large scale environments. In ReeseH. (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (pp. 9–55). New York: Academic Press.
33.
SmytheM., & KennedyJ. (1982). Orientation in spatial representations within multiple frames of reference.British Journal of Psychology, 73, 527–535.
34.
StrelowE. (1985). What is needed for a theory of mobility: Direct perception and cognitive maps—lessons from the blind.Psychological Review, 92, 226–248.
35.
WiedelJ. (Ed.) (1983). Proceedings of the First International Conference on Maps and Graphics for the Visually Impaired.Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers.
36.
WorchelP. (1951). Space perception and orientation in the blind.Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 65(Whole No. 332).
