A procedure for gathering objective data on specific reading behaviors that would assist multidisciplinary teams to determine the relative effectiveness of reading in large print and in regular print for a student with low vision was developed and evaluated, and a case-study approach was used to examine the reading behaviors of six elementary-aged students with low vision, all readers of large-print materials. Individual profiles, developed to compare reading behaviors observed in each print size, were analyzed qualitatively. The procedure was effective in providing information for deciding on the size of print for individual students.
ChristieJ.F. (1979). The qualitative analysis system: Updating the IRI.Reading World, 18, 393–399.
4.
ChristieJ.F. (1981). The effects of grade level and reading ability on children's miscue patterns.Journal of Educational Research, 74, 419–423.
5.
CornA., & RyserG. (1989). Access to print for students with low vision.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 83, 340–349.
6.
Council of Executives of American Residential Schools for the Visually Handicapped. (1990). Literacy for blind and visually impaired school-age students.RE:view, 22, 159–163.
7.
CunninghamJ.W. (1984). A simplified miscue analysis for classroom and clinic.Reading Horizons, 24, 83–89.
8.
GoodmanK.S., & GoodmanY.W. (1977). Learning about psycholinguistic processes by analyzing oral reading.Harvard Educational Review, 47, 317–333.
9.
GoodmanY.M., & BurkeC.L. (1972). Reading miscue inventory: Procedures for diagnosis and evaluation.New York: Macmillan.
10.
KoenigA.J., & HolbrookM.C. (1989). Determining the reading medium for students with visual impairments: A diagnostic teaching approach.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 83, 296–302.
11.
KoenigA.J., & HolbrookM.C. (1991). Determining the reading medium for visually impaired students via diagnostic teaching.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 85, 61–68.
12.
MarshakS. (1987). The month-brothers. In ArnoldV.A., & SmithC.B. (Eds.), Sketches: Macmillan connections reading program (pp. 468–478). New York: Macmillan.
13.
MangoldS., & MangoldP. (1989). Selecting the most appropriate primary learning medium for students with functional vision.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 83, 294–296.
14.
McNamaraW.J., PatersonD.G., & TinkerM.A. (1953). The influence of size of type on speed of reading in the primary grades.Sight-Saving Review, 23, 28–33.
15.
MorrisO.F. (1973). Reading performance of normally sighted and partially sighted third and fourth grade students using regular print and large print (doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota).
RexE.J. (1989). Issues related to literacy of legally blind learners.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 83, 306–313.
18.
SchroederF. (1989). Literacy: The key to opportunity.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 83, 290–293.
19.
SloanL.L., & HabelA. (1973). Reading speeds with textbooks in large and in standard print.Sight-Saving Review, 43, 107–111.
20.
StephensO. (1989). Braille—Implications for living.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 83, 288–289.
21.
SykesK.S. (1971). A comparison of the effectiveness of standard print in facilitating the reading of visually impaired students.Education of the Visually Handicapped, 3, 97–106.
