This article reports on a study of the pedagogical relevance of a computerized sound-based interactive tool as support for educating blind children. It details the concepts and materials that were developed and tested in classrooms and points out that a sound-based approach can be used for teaching in such different domains as sound awareness, logic, language, and technology.
BurgerD., LiardC., & RouxG. (1987). A sound-based learning tool for both blind and sighted children.Proceedings of the IEEE/9th Annual Conference of Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.New York: Institute of Electrical & Electronics Engineers.
3.
BradleyL., & BryantP.E. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection, Nature, 301, 419–421.
4.
CarrollJ.M., MackR.L., & KelloggW.A. (1990). Interface metaphors and user interface design. In HelanderM. (Ed.), Handbook of human-computer interaction.Amsterdam: North Holland.
5.
ContentA., MoraisJ., AlegriaJ., & BertelsonP. (1982). Accelerating the development of phonetic segmentation skills in kindergartners, Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 2, 259–269.
6.
KeirasD.E., & BovairS. (1984). The role of mental model in learning to operate a device, Cognitive Science, 8, 255–273.
7.
OlofssonA., & LundbergI. (1985). Evaluation of long term effects of phonemic awareness training in kindergarten.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 26, 21–34.
ReisnerP. (1984). Formal grammar as a tool for analyzing ease of use: Some fundamental concepts. In ThomasJ., & SchneiderM. (Eds.), Human factors in computing systems.Norwood, NJ: Ablex.