This article reports on a study that examined whether blind persons could learn the spatial layout of landmarks in a new large-scale space more accurately utilizing a microcomputer simulation of the environment versus a tactile graphic aid of a similar environment. The four congenitally blind subjects each explored a simulation of a 5 x 5-block residential neighborhood daily for 27 days, learning the spatial layout of the 9 landmarks in each simulation. Although they learned the spatial locations of the landmarks faster using the tactile graphic aid, the accuracy of their spatial knowledge was equal for both conditions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonJ.R., & PaulsonR. (1978). Interference in memory for pictorial information.Cognitive Psychology, 10, 178–202.
2.
BarthJ.L. (1982). The development and evaluation of a tactile graphics kit.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 76, 269–273.
3.
BentzenB.L. (1972). Production and testing of an orientation and travel map for visually handicapped persons.New Outlook for the Blind, 66, 249–255.
4.
BerlaE.P. (1972). Behavioral strategies and problems in scanning and interpreting tactual displays.New Outlook for the Blind, 66, 272–286.
5.
CaseyS.M. (1978). Cognitive mapping by the blind.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 72, 297–301.
6.
ChewS.L. (1986). The use of traffic sounds by blind pedestrians. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota.
7.
ClaytonK., & WoodyardM. (1981). The acquisition and utilization of spatial knowledge. In HarveyJ.H. (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior, and the environment (pp. 151–161). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
EastonR.D., & BentzenB.L. (1987). Memory for verbally presented routes: A comparison of strategies used by blind and sighted people.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 81, 100–105.
10.
FletcherJ.F. (1980). Spatial representation in blind children. 1: Development compared to sighted children.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 74, 381–385.
11.
FoulkeE. (1971). The perceptual basis for mobility.American Foundation for the Blind Research Bulletin, 23, 1–8.
12.
HermanJ.F., HermanT.G., & ChatmanS.P. (1983). Constructing cognitive maps from partial information: A demonstration study with congenitally blind subjects.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 77, 195–198.
13.
HillE.W., & PonderP. (1976). Orientation and mobility techniques: A guide for the practitioner.New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
14.
JuurmaaJ. (1973). Transportation in mental spatial manipulation: A theoretical analysis.American Foundation for the Blind Research Bulletin, 26, 87–143.
15.
KosslynS.M., & PomerantzJ. (1977). Imagery, propositions, and the form of internal representations.Cognitive Psychology, 9, 52–76.
16.
LeonardJ.A., & NewmanR.C. (1967). Spatial orientation in the blind.Nature, 215, 1413–1414.
17.
LeonardJ.A., & NewmanR.C. (1970). Three types of “maps” for blind travel.Ergonomics, 13, 165–179.
18.
LockmanJ.J., RieserJ.J., & PickH.L.Jr. (1981). Assessing blind travelers’ knowledge of spatial layout.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 75, 321–326.
19.
MaglioneF.D.Jr. (1969). An experimental study of the use of tactual maps as oriental and mobility aids for adult blind subjects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois.
20.
PaivioA. (1975). Perceptual comparisons through the mind's eye.Memory and Cognition, 3, 635–647.
21.
PylyshynZ.W. (1973). What the mind's eye tells the mind's brain: A critique of mental imagery.Psychological Bulletin, 80, 1–24.
22.
RieserJ.J., GuthD.A., & HillE.W. (1982). Mental processes mediating independent travel: Implications for orientation and mobility.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 76, 213–218.
23.
RieserJ.J., GuthD.A., & HillE.W. (1986). Sensitivity to perspective structure while walking without vision.Perception, 15, 173–188.
24.
RieserJ.J., HillE.W., BradfieldA.B., TalorC., RosenS., & DenistonT. (1985). The spatial orientation of low vision adults: Final report.Washington, DC: National Institute of Handicapped Research.
25.
SiegelA.W., & WhiteS.H. (1975). The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. In ReeseH.W. (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior: Vol. 1 (pp. 9–55). New York: Academic Press.
26.
TawneyJ.W., & GastD.L. (1984). Single subject research in special education.Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
