An intelligence test for blind and low vision children—aged 6 to 15 years—has been constructed. Based on a short vision test, two groups of braille educated children were distinguished: children without usable vision and children with usable vision. No blindfold is used in this test. This article summarizes the results of different types of statistical analyses. Within this framework, more detailed quantitative research can be interpreted. The subtests appear to be highly reliable, and achievement in school can be predicted with some accuracy. Factor analysis indicates four interpretable factors in both vision groups. The vision groups—for which separate age-norms were established—differed mainly on tests measuring spatial ability.
CoxonA.P. (1982). The user's guide to multidimensional scaling.London: Heinemann Educational Books.
3.
CronbachL.J. (1984). Essentials of psychological testing (4th ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
4.
DekkerR. (1987). Intelligentie van visueel gehandicapte kinderen in de leeftijd van 6 tot 15 jaar. Dissertatie. Amsterdam: V.U. Boekhandel.
5.
DekkerR., DrenthP.J.D., & ZaalJ.N. (1989). Handleiding bij de Intelligentie test voor Visueel gehandicapte kinderen (ITVIK).Interne publikatie Arbeids- en Organisatiepsychologie, V.U.Amsterdam.
6.
DekkerR., DrenthP.J.D., & ZaalJ.N. (1988). Brochure: A nonverbal intelligence test series for blind and low vision children aged 6 to 15 years: Intelligence Test for Visually Handicapped Children (ITVIC).
7.
DrenthP.J.D. (1975). Inleiding in de testtheorie.Deventer: Van Loghum Slaterus.
8.
DrenthP.J.D. (1983). Cultuur en intelligentie: Een psychometrische optiek.Mededelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Academie van Wetenschappen, 46(5).
9.
EkstromR.B., FrenchJ.W., HarmanH.H., & DermenD. (1986). Manual for Kit of Factor-Referenced Cognitive Tests.Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
10.
FischerG. (1974). Einfuhrung in die Theorie psychologischer Tests; Grundlagen und Anwendungen.Bern: Verlag Hans Huber.
11.
van HaasenP.P. (1986). WISC-R Nederlandstalige uitgave.Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
12.
HallA., SchollG.T., & SwallowR.M. (1986). Psychoeducational assessment. In SchollG.T. (ed.), Foundations of education for blind and visually handicapped children and youth: Theory and practice.New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
13.
HendersonF. (1974). Communication skills. In LowenfeldB. (ed.). The visually handicapped child in school.London: Constable.
14.
JensenA.R. (1980). Bias in mental testing.London: Methuen.
15.
KailR., & PellegrinoJ.W. (1985). Human Intelligence: Perspectives and prospects.New York: Freeman.
16.
MommersM., & SmitsB. (1975). Comparison of the performances of blind and sighted children on the verbal part of the WISC.Sehgeschadigte, 7, 21–38.
17.
NunnallyJ.C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
18.
SnowR.E., KyllonenP.C., & MarshalekB. (1984). The topography of ability and learning correlations. In SternbergR.J. (ed.). Advances in the psychology of human intelligence. Vol. 2Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19.
SternbergR.J., & DettermanD.K. (eds.) (1986). What is intelligence? Contemporary viewpoints on its nature and definition.New York: Ablex.
20.
SternbergR.J., & PowellJ.S. (1982). Theories of Intelligence. In SternbergR.J. (ed.). Handbook of human intelligence.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21.
SuinnR., & DautermanW. (1966). Stanford-Ohwaki-Kohs Block Design Intelligence test for the blind (manual). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
22.
TillmanM.H. (1967). The performance of blind and sighted children on the WISC: Study I.International Journal for the Education of the Blind, 16, 65–74.
23.
TillmanM.H. (1967). The performance of blind and sighted children on the WISC: Study I and II.International Journal for the Education of the Blind, 16, 65–74 and 106–112.
