While many state, local and private organizations advocate the use of “vision stimulation” to help the visually impaired person, little if any scientific evidence is available that directly supports the implementation of such programs. The purpose of this paper is to advance the premise that appropriate vision stimulation can increase the sensori-neural foundation for vision, and to present background evidence from a number of diverse fields for such a premise.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AssafA. A. (1982). The sensitive period: Transfer of fixation after occlusion for strabismus amblyopia.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 66, 64–70.
2.
BarragaN. C. (1964). Increased visual behavior in low vision children.American Foundation for the Blind, Research Series. No. 13.
3.
BlakemoreC. (1970). Development of the brain depends on the visual environment.Nature, 228, 477–478.
4.
BlasdelG. G., PettigrewJ. D. (1978). Effect of prior visual experience on cortical recovery from the effects of unilateral eyelid suture in kittens.Journal of Physiology, 274, 601–619.
5.
CampbellF. W. (1978). Preliminary results of a physiologically based treatment of amblyopia.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 62, 748–755.
6.
CrewthersD. P. (1981). The efficacy of brief periods of reverse occlusion in promoting recovery from the physiological effects of monocular deprivation in kittens.Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 21(2), 357–362.
7.
HessR. F., FranceT. D., UlkerT. K. (1981). Residual vision in humans who have been monocularly deprived of pattern stimulation in early life.Experimental Brain Research, 44, 295–311.
8.
HoffmanK. P. (1983). Optokinetic nystagmus and single-cell response in the nucleus tractus opticus after early monocular deprivation in the cat. In Development Neurobiology of Vision, ed. FreemanR. D., N.Y.: Plenum Press.
9.
HubelD. H., WieselT. N. (1963). Receptive fields of cells in striate cortex of very young, visually inexperienced kittens.Journal of Neurophysiology, 6, 1003–1017.
10.
JacobsonS. G. (1981). Development of visual acuity in infants with congenital cataracs.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 65, 727–735.
11.
LennerstrandG., SamuelsonB. (1983). Amblyopia in 4-year-old children treated with grating stimulation and full-time occlusion; a comparative study.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 67, 181–90.
12.
LeventhalA. G., HirschH. V. (1957). Cortical effect of early selective exposure to diagonal lines.Science, 190, 902–904.
13.
MitchellD. E. (1978). Recovery from the effects of monocular deprivation in kittens.Journal of Comparative Neurology, 176, 53–64.
14.
MovshonJ. A., Van SluytersR. C. (1981). Visual neural development.Ann. Rev. Psychol., 32, 477–522.
15.
MuirMitchell (1973). Visual Resolution and Experience: Acuity deficits in cats following early selective visual deprivation.Science, 1011–1013.
16.
OdomJ. V. (1981). Effects of natural deprivation and unilateral eye patching on visual acuity of infants and children.Archives Ophthalmology, 99, 1412–1416.
17.
PettigrewJ. D. (1974). The effect of visual experience on the development of stimulus specificity by kittens cortical neurons.Journal of Physiology, 237, 49–74.
18.
ReineckeR. D. (1971). Strabismus, Archives of Ophthalmology, 86.
19.
RogersG. L., ChazanS., FellowsR., TsouB. (1982). Strabismus surgery and its effect upon infant development in congenital esotropia.Ophthalmology, 89(5), 479–83.
20.
SinghG., DasP. N. (1978). Pattern of amblyopia and fixation after keratoplasty.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 62, 29, 33.
21.
SmithD. C. (1978). Role of Visual Experience in postcritical-period reversal of effects of monocular deprivation in cat striate cortex.Journal of Comparative Neurology, 178(2), 313–328.
22.
SpearP. D., HickeyT. C. (1979). Postcritical-period reversal of monocular deprivation on dorsal lateral geniculate cell in the cat.Journal of Comparative Neurology, 185, 317–328.
23.
StrykerM. P., SherkH. (1975). Modification of cortical orientation selectively in the cat by restricted visual experience: A reexamination.Science, 190, 904–6.
24.
TrauR. (1981). Personal experience with the CAM vision stimulator, a new treatment for amblyopia.Bull. Soc., Beige Ophthalmology, 196, 67–75.
25.
VaeganTaylor D. (1979). Critical period for deprivation amblyopia in children.Trans Ophthalmology Soc U.K., 99, 432–9.
26.
Von NoordenG. K. (1974). Factors involved in the production of amblyopia.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 58, 158–64.
27.
Von NoordenG. K. (1978). Primate model for amblyopia. In: Reinecke R.D., ed.Proceedings III Meeting International Strabismus AssociationNew York, Grune & Stratton, 23–29.
28.
WieselT. N. (1982). Postnatal development of the visual cortex and the influence of environment.Nature, 299, 583–591.
29.
WilkinsonF. E. (1980). Reversal of the behavioral effects of monocular deprivation as a function of age in the kitten.Behavioral Brain Research, 101–123.
30.
WillshawH. E. (1980). Experience with the CAM vision stimulator: Preliminary report.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 64, 339–341.
