The study examined question frequencies and types in language samples from 36 sighted and visually impaired children. Blind, low vision, and sighted groups between the ages of 4 and 10 produced spontaneous samples while discussing a group of household objects. An ANOVA demonstrated significant differences between blind/sighted and low vision/sighted groups in the ratio of questions asked per 100 utterances. Non-statistical comparison of question types indicated some minor distinctions of type usage by age and visual function.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BalikovH., and FeinsteinC. B. (1979). The blind child. In CallJ., CohenR., BerlinI. (Eds.), Basic Handbook of Child Psychiatry (Vol. 1). New York: Basic Books.
2.
BurlinghamD. (1961). Some notes on the development of the blind.Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 16, 121–145.
3.
DoreJ. (1978). Requestive systems in nursery school conversations: Analysis of talk in its social context. In CampbellR., SmithP. (Eds.), Recent advances in the psychology of language: Language development and mother-child interaction.New York: Plenum.
4.
ErinJ. (1981). Suzie's language: Observations of a four-year-old girl. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pittsburgh, Language Development.
5.
KekelisL. S., and AndersenE. S. (1984). Family communication styles and language development.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 78, 54–65.
6.
MaxfieldK. E. (1936). The spoken language of the blind preschool child.Archives of Psychology.
7.
MulfordR. (1983). Referential development in blind children. In MillsA. (Ed.), Language acquisition in the blind child, normal and deficient.San Diego: College-Hill.
8.
PiagetJ. (1959). The language and thought of the child.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
9.
RogowS. M. (1972). Language acquisition and the blind retarded child.Education of the Visually Handicapped, 4, 36–40.
10.
RogowS. M. (1981). Developing play skills and communicative competence in multiply handicapped young people.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 5, 197–202.
