There is little data-based research reported that reflects any empirical evidence of relationships between family attitudes toward blindness and visual impairment and rehabilitation outcome. This paper reflects the results of an ex post facto research study of family attitudes toward blindness as reported by three different groups of rehabilitation closures. A number of significant differences were found between the groups on a semantic differential scale, which suggests that the family is indeed a major contributing factor to successful rehabilitation and securing gainful employment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CarpenterJ. O. (1974). Changing roles and disagreement in families with disabled husbands.Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 55, 272–274.
2.
ClarkG. M. (1966). Problems in vocational rehabilitation of the visually handicapped.New Outlook for the Blind, 60(1), 22–26.
3.
DishartM. (1964). Family adjustment in the rehabilitation plan.New Outlook for the Blind, 58(9), 292–294.
4.
FeatherstoneH. (1980). A difference in the family.New York: Basic Books, 1980, pp. 215–240.
5.
FinestoneS. (1960). The family in the rehabilitation of blind persons. In FinestoneS. (Ed.), Social casework and blindness (pp. 125–133). New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
6.
FreedmanS. (1981). Family reactions to blindness and visual impairment. Unpublished manuscript.
7.
HobbsD. F. (1978). Family roles and functions: Some implications for the disabled and their rehabilitation. In PageR. C., and SettlesR. B. (Eds.), Family involvement in the rehabilitation of the severely disabled (pp. 8–21). Athens, Ga.: University of Georgia.
8.
JacusC. M. (1981). Working with families in a rehabilitation setting.Rehabilitation Nursing, 6(3), 10–14.
9.
KlausnerS. Z. (1969). Disabled families—A study of a link between the social contribution of the disabled and the retardation of their rehabilitation in the family context.Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
10.
KrauseE. A. (1962). Dependency and the blind: Family versus therapeutic work setting.New Outlook for the Blind, 56, 353–357.
11.
LindenbergR. E. (1980). Work with families in rehabilitation. In PowerP. W., & Dell OrtoA. E. (Eds.), Role of the family in the rehabilitation of the physically disabled.Baltimore: University Park Press, pp. 516–525.
12.
McCubbinH. I., JoyC. B., CaubleA. E., ComeauJ. K., PattersonJ. M., & NeedleR. H. (1980). Family stress and coping: A decade review.Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42(4), 855–871.
13.
McDanielJ. W. (1976). Physical disability and human behavior (2nd ed.). New York: Pergamon Press, p. 49.
14.
NieN. H., HullC. H., JenkinsJ. G., SteinbrennerK., & DentD. H. (1975). Statistical package for the social sciences (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
15.
OsgoodC. E. (1969). The nature and measurement of meaning. In SniderJ. G., & OsgoodC. E. (Eds.), Semantic differential technique — A sourcebook (p. 34). Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
16.
OsgoodC. E., SuciG., & TannenbaumP. H. (1975). The measurement of meaning.Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois.
17.
PageR. C., & SettlesR. B. (1978). Family involvement in the rehabilitation of the severely disabled.Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia.
18.
PerleT (1978). A matter of adjustment: A personal reaction to visual loss.Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 72, 255–258.
19.
PowerP. (1976, Spring). The utilization of the family in the rehabilitation of the chronically ill patient: Some new perspectives for the allied health professional.Journal of Allied Health, 42–51.
20.
PowerP. W., & Dell OrtoA. E. (1980). General impact of adult disability/illness on the family. In PowerP. W., & Dell OrtoA. E. (Eds.), Role of the family in the rehabilitation of the physically disabled (pp. 145–151). Baltimore: University Park Press.
21.
Rehab Brief. (1978, Sept. 15). The role of the family in rehabilitation.Washington, DC: Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
22.
ReidE. (1960). Factors influencing vocational rehabilitation of the blind.New York: American Foundation for the Blind.
23.
RobertsA. (1973). Psychosocial rehabilitation of the blind.Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
24.
RusalemH. (1972). Coping with the unseen environment—An introduction to the vocational rehabilitation of blind persons.New York: Teachers College Press.
25.
SaxonJ. P., SpitznagelR. J., & SchuttP. K. (1983). Indicators of successful vocational rehabilitation.Journal of Rehabilitation, 49(3), 69–72.
26.
SchulzP. J. (1968). A group approach to working with families of the blind.New Outlook for the Blind, 62, 82–86.
27.
ShellbaseL. J., & ShellbaseF. E. (1980). Role of the family in rehabilitation. In PowerP. W., & Dell OrtoH. E. (Eds.), Role of the family in rehabilitation of the physically disabled (pp. 526–535). Baltimore: University Park Press.
ThomasK. R., & BrittonJ. O. (1973). Perceptions of family dependence by the physically disabled.Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 16(3), 156–161.
30.
ThomasK. R., ButlerA. J., & DavisR. M. (1979). Semantic differentiation of meaning with the physically disabled.Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 23(1), 48–57.
31.
VashC. L. (1981). The psychology of disability.New York: Springer Publishing Company.
32.
VersluysH. P. (1980). Physical rehabilitation and family dynamics.Rehabilitation Literature, 41, 58–65.
33.
WangV. L., & RogolskyS. (1970). Rehabilitation work with the blind: Role of the helping professional in creating a family team.College Park, Maryland: Cooperative Extension Service (University of Maryland).
34.
WardellK. T. (1976). Parental assistance in orientation and mobility instruction.New Outlook for the Blind, 70, 321–325.
35.
Work and families—A report to corporate leaders on the White House conference on families. (1980). New York: J. C. Penney Company.
