This article reviews current and consistent methodological problems that occur in research articles using single-case experimental designs. Problems discussed include (1) the use of pre- and quasi-experimental single-case designs, (2) the presentation and analysis of data, (3) the lack or inadequate demonstration of experimental reliability, and (4) the improper or ineffective use of generalization. The authors suggest ways of solving these problems and provide guidelines for avoiding their recurrence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaerD. M., WolfM. M., and RisleyT. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 91–97.
BarlowD. M., and HersenM. (1973). Single-case experimental designs: Uses in applied clinical research.Archives of General Psychiatry, 29, 319–325.
4.
BellackA. S., and HersenM. (1977). Behavior modifications: An introductory textbook.Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
5.
BerginA. E., and StruppH. H. (1972). Changing frontiers in the science of psychotherapy.New York: Aldine-Atherton.
6.
BirkimerJ. C., and BrownJ. H. (1979). A graphical judgmental aid which summarizes obtained and chance reliability data and helps assess the believability of experimental effect.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 523–533.
7.
BonfantiB. H. (1979). Effects of training on nonverbal and verbal behaviors of congenitally blind adults.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 73, 1–9.
8.
ChassanJ. B. (1967). Research design in clinical psychology and psychiatry.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
9.
EdgingtonE. S. (1967). Statistical inference from N = 1 experiments.The Journal of Psychology, 65, 195–199.
10.
EdwardsA. L. (1967). Statistical methods (2ndEd.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
11.
ElsahoffJ. D., and ThoresenC. E. (1978). Choosing a statistical method for analysis of an intensive experiment. In KratochwillT. (Ed.), Single subject research: Strategies for evaluating change.New York: Academic Press.
12.
HallR., CristlerC., CranstonS., and TuckerB. (1970). Teachers and parents and researchers using multiple baseline designs.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 3, 247–255.
13.
HawkinsR. P., and DotsonV. A. (1975). Reliability scores that delude: An Alice in Wonderland trip through the misleading characteristics of inter-observer agreement scores in interval recording. In RampE., SembG. (Eds.), Behavioral analysis: Areas of research and application.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
14.
HawkinsR. P., and FabryB. D. (1979). Applied behavior analysis and interobserver reliability: A commentary on two articles by Birkimer and Brown.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 545–552.
15.
HersenM., and BarlowD. H. (1976). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change.New York: Pergamon Press.
16.
JonesR. R., VaughtR. S., and WeinrottM. (1977). Time-series analysis in operant research.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 10, 151–166.
17.
KazdinA. E. (1976). Statistical analysis for single-case experimental designs. In HersenM., BarlowD. (Eds.), Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change.New York: Pergamon Press.
18.
KazdinA. E. (1977). Assessing the clinical or applied importance of behavior change through social validation.Behavior Modification, 1, 427–451.
19.
KazdinA. E. (1982). Single-case designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings.New York: University Press.
20.
KazdinA. E., and KopelS. A. (1975). On resolving ambiguities of the multiple-baseline design: Problems and recommendations.Behavior Therapy, 6, 601–608.
21.
KratochwillT. R. (1978). Single subject research: Strategies for evaluating change.New York: Academic Press.
22.
LeitenbergH. (1973). The use of single-case methodology in psychotherapy research.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 82, 87–101.
23.
MichaelJ. (1974). Statistical inference for individual organism research: Mixed blessing or curse?Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 7, 647–653.
24.
NeiswangerW. A. (1956). Elementary statistical methods as applied to business and economic data (Rev. ed.). New York: Macmillan.
25.
ParsonsonB. S., and BaerD. M. (1978). The analysis and presentation of graphic data. In KratochwillT. (Ed.), Single subject research: Strategies for evaluating change.New York: Academic Press.
26.
SidmanM. (1960). Tactics of scientific research: Evaluating experimental data in psychology.New York: Basic Books.
27.
Van HasseltV. B., and HersenM. (1981). Applications of single-case designs for research with visually impaired individuals.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 75, 359–362.
28.
WalkerH. M., and HopsH. (1976). Use of normative peer data as a standard for evaluating classroom treatment effects.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 159–168.
29.
WolfM. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart.Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.
