Failure to apply research findings to educational practice is a long-standing problem. Several reasons for this are discussed. Five dissemination models that may insure that research findings are translated into practice are described from the literature. Current research findings in seven areas related to education for visually handicapped people are summarized, together with recommended dissemination procedures. The difficulties of applying research findings from one country to programs in another, particularly a developing country, are discussed briefly.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdkinsP. G., and AinsaT. D.An early stimulation program for visually handicapped infants and toddlers.Education of the Visually Handicapped, 1978, 10, 75–79.
2.
BarragaN. C.Increased visual behavior in low vision children.New York: American Foundation for the Blind, 1964.
3.
BarragaN. C.Teacher's guide for development of visual learning abilities and utilization of low vision.Louisville, Ky.: American Printing House for the Blind, 1970.
4.
BarragaN. C., and MorrisJ. E.Program to develop functioning: Design for instruction (Vol. 2). Louisville, Ky.: American Printing House for the Blind, 1980(a).
5.
BarragaN. C., and MorrisJ. E.Program to develop efficiency in visual functioning: Diagnostic assessment procedure (Vol. 1). Louisville, Ky.: American Printing House for the Blind, 1980(b).
6.
BergerC.Investigation of teacher behavior: Interaction with new curriculum material. In PiperM. (Ed.), Attitudes toward science: Investigators.Columbus SMEAC: Ohio State University, 1979.
7.
BergerC., and SchnurR.Benefits from science education for the handicapped. In Sourcebook: Science education and the physically handicapped.Washington, D.C.: National Science Teachers Association, 1979.
8.
BlazieD. B.Total talk: A computer terminal for the blind.Proceedings of Johns Hopkins First National Search for Applications of Personal Computing to Aid the Handicapped, 1981, 251–254.
9.
BloomB. S.Twenty-five years of educational research.American Educational Research Journal, 1966, 3, 211–221.
10.
BowerT. G. R.Blind babies see with their ears.New Scientist, February 1977, 255–257.
11.
BronfenbrennerU.The experimental ecology of education.Educational Researcher, 1976, 5, 5–15.
ChapmanE. K.Visually handicapped children and young people.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978b.
14.
CroftN. B., and RobinsonL. W.Project visionup curriculum: A training program for preschool handicapped children.Gooding, Idaho: Idaho State School for the Deaf and Blind, 1976.
15.
CurranE. A.NIE: An agenda for the 80s.Educational Researcher, 1982, 11, 10–12, 21.
16.
Dissemin/Action.An introduction to Dissemin/Action.Falls Church, Va.: Author, n.d.
17.
FerrellK. A.Can infants use the Sonicguide? Two years experience at Project VIEW.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 1980, 74, 209–220.
18.
GallagherJ. J.The search for priorities for educational research and development.Educational Psychologist, 1971, 8, 25–31.
GideonseH. D.Policy framework for educational research.Science, 1970, 170, 1054–1059.
21.
GillJ. M.International register of research on blindness and visual impairment.Coventry, England: Warwick Research Unit for the Blind, University of Warwick, 1979.
22.
GoodladJ. I.What goes on in schools.Educational Researcher, 1977, 6, 3–6.
23.
HaneyW.Validity, vaudeville, and values.American Psychologist, 1981, 36, 1021–1034.
24.
HayesS. P.Contributions to a psychology of blindness.New York: American Foundation for the Blind, 1941.
25.
HobenM., LindstromV., GishS., ShapiroS., and ChalbergC.Integration of vision impaired students and hearing impaired students in regular classrooms. A report of research.Minneapolis: Joint Independent School District 287, 1979.
26.
HoweH.Education research—The promise and the problem.Educational Researcher, 1976, 5, 2–7.
27.
HuebnerK. M.An optacon dissemination project follow-through: A national evaluation study.Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh, 1980.
28.
KayL., and KayN.Blind children: The spatial sensory's role as a developmental aid.Unpublished manuscript. Christchurch, New Zealand: University of Canterbury, 1981.
29.
KerlingerF. N.The influence of research on educational practice.Educational Researcher, 1977, 6, 5–12.
30.
KlausmeierH. J.A research strategy for educational improvement.Educational Researcher, 1982, 11, 8–13.
31.
KrathwohlD. R.An analysis of the perceived ineffectiveness of educational research and some recommendations.Educational Psychologist, 1974, 2, 73–86.
32.
Lawrence Hall of Science.Science activities for the visually impaired.Berkeley, Calif.: University of California, 1981.
33.
LINC.The market linkage project in special education.Columbus, Ohio: Linc Resources, n.d.
34.
MaxfieldK. E.The preschool child. In ZahlP. A. (Ed.), Blindness: Modern approaches to the unseen environment.Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1950.
35.
O'BrienR.Alive. aware. a person.Rockville, Md.: Montgomery County Public Schools, 1976.
36.
PaddockS. C., and PackardJ. S.On the conduct of site relations in educational research.Educational Researcher, 1981, 10, 14–17.
37.
PhillipsD. C.What do the researcher and the practitioner have to offer each other?Educational Researcher, 1980, 9, 17–20, 24.
38.
The Preschool program at Perkins.The Lantern, 1982, 51, 6–12.
39.
ReschlyD. J.Psychological testing in educational classification and placement.American Psychologist, 1981, 36, 1094–1102.
40.
RexE. J. (Ed.). Methods and procedures for training low vision skills: Proceedings of a special study institute.Normal, Ill.: Illinois State University, 1971.
41.
RyanS. G., and BediD. N.Toward computer literacy for visually impaired students.Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 1978, 72, 302–306.
42.
SchindeleR.Handicapped children in different educational settings.Heidelberg, West Germany: University of Education, n.d.
43.
SchollG. T.Self-study and evaluation guide for day school programs for visually handicapped pupils: A guide for program improvement.Reston, Va.: Council for Exceptional Children, 1980.
44.
SchubertW. H.Recalibrating educational research: Toward a focus on practice.Educational Researcher, 1980, 9, 17–24, 31.
45.
SchutzR. E.Where we've been, where we are, and where we're going in educational R & D.Educational Researcher, 1979, 8, 6–8, 24.
46.
Social studies materials adaptations for visusually handicapped elementary students. Grant no. G007701353, final report. Boulder, Colo.: Social Science Education Consortium, 1981.
47.
SpunginS. J.Competency-based curriculum for teachers of the visually handicapped: A national study.New York: American Foundation for the Blind, 1977.
48.
SpunginS. J. (Ed.). Guidelines for public school programs serving visually handicapped children.New York: American Foundation for the Blind, 1980.
49.
StephensB., GrubeC., and FitzgeraldJ.Project PAVE (final report). Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Education for the Handicapped, U. S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, November 1977.
50.
StephensB., and SimpkinsK.The reasoning, moral judgment, and moral conduct of the congenitally blind.Project No. H23-3197, final report. Philadelphia: Temple University, 1974.
51.
StrelowE. R., and BoysJ. T.The Canterbury child's aid: A binaural spatial sensor for research with blind children.Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 1979, 73, 179–184.
52.
StrelowE. R., KayN., and KayL.Binaural sensory aid: Case studies of its use by two children.Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 1978, 72, 179–184.
53.
SwallowR. M.Assessment for visually handicapped children and youth.New York: American Foundation for the Blind, 1977.
54.
SwallowR. M., MangoldS., and MangoldP.Informal assessment of developmental skills for visually handicapped students.New York: American Foundation for the Blind, 1978.
TobinM. J.A study in the improvement of visual efficiency in children registered as blind.New Beacon, 1971, 56, 58–60.
57.
TobinM. J., JamesW. R. K., McVeighA., and IrvingR. M.Print reading by the blind: An evaluation of the Optacon and an investigation of some learner variables and teaching methods.Birmingham, England: University of Birmingham Research Centre for the Education of the Visually Handicapped, 1973.
58.
U. K. Department of Education and Science.The education of the visually handicapped.London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1972.
59.
WarrenD. H.Blindness and early childhood development.New York: American Foundation for the Blind, 1977.
60.
WeihlC. A.Ultrasound used as an environmental sensor by blind infants. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan1982.
61.
WillsD. M.Work with mothers of young blind children.Occasional Papers (British Psychological Society), 1978, 2, 32–38.
