This article reviews the history of the development of lighting standards for the visually impaired. All available literature on how different levels of illumination affect visual acuity and visibility among persons with visual impairments is reviewed. And the implications of this research for meeting the needs of visually impaired children in the classroom are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AshcroftS. C., HallidayC., and BarragaN.Effects of experimental teaching on visual behavior of children educated as though they had no vision.Report to U.S. Office of Education. Nashville, Tenn.: George Peabody College for Teachers, 1965.
2.
BarragaN.Mode of reading for low vision students.International Journal for the Education of the Blind, 1963, 12, 103–107.
3.
BarragaN.Increased visual behavior in low vision children.New York: American Foundation for the Blind, 1964.
4.
BierN.Correction of subnormal vision.London: Butterworths, 1960.
5.
CalorosoE., and FlomM. C.Influences of luminance on visual acuity in amblyopia.American Journal of Optometry and American Archives of Optometry, 1961, 46, 189–195.
6.
DatesH. B.Industrial and school lighting.Transactions of the Illuminating Society, 1934, 29, 866–877.
FerreeC. E., and RandG.The use of the illumination scale for the detection of small errors in refraction and in their correction.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1920, 3, 243–256. (a)
9.
FerreeC. E., and RandG.Visual acuity at low illumination and the use of the illumination scale for the detection of small errors in refraction.American Journal of Ophthalmology, 1920, 3(4), 408–417. (b)
10.
FerreeC. E., and RandG.The effect of intensity of illumination on the acuity of the normal eye and eyes slightly defective as to refraction.American Journal of Psychology, 1923, 34, 244–249.
11.
FondaG.Management of the patient with subnormal vision. (2nd ed.) St. Louis, Mo.: C.V. Mosby Co., 1970.
12.
FramptonM. E.The tragedy of modern day education for the blind as practiced in the integrated public day school classes.New York: The New York Institute for the Education of the Blind, undated.
13.
HopkinsonR. C.Studies of lighting and vision in schools.Transactions of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 1949, 14(8), 244–268.
14.
Illuminating Engineering Society.Standards for lighting sight-saving classrooms.Transactions of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 1937, 32, 807–814.
15.
Illuminating Engineering Society.American standard practice for school lighting.Transactions of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 1948, 43, 793–865.
16.
Illuminating Engineering Society, American Institute of Architects, and National Council for Schoolhouse Construction.American guide for school lighting.Illuminating Engineering, 1962, 57, 253–286.
17.
IrwinR. B.As I saw it.New York: American Foundation for the Blind, 1955.
18.
KuntzJ. E.The effects of intensity of illumination on “normal” and “subnormal” acuity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue UniversityLafayette, Indiana, 1950.
19.
KuntzJ. E., and SleightR. B.Effect of target brightness on “normal” and “subnormal” visual acuity.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1949, 33, 83–91.
20.
LehonL. H.The effect of self-selected lighting upon reading speed and comprehension of normally sighted and visually impaired children.Lighting Design & Application, 1976, 6(5), 32–43.
21.
LuckieshM., and EastmanA. A.Footcandles for critical seeing.Transactions of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 1946, 41, 828–846.
22.
LuckieshM., and MossF. K.Lighting plus vision equals seeing.Transactions of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 1930, 39, 807–824.
23.
LuckieshM., and MossF. K.Relative visibility of print in terms of iillumination intensity.Sight-Saving Review, 1935, 5(4), 272–250.
24.
LuckieshM., and MossF. K.Visual tasks in sight-saving classes.American Journal of Ophthalmology, 1936, 19(11), 992–999.
25.
LuckieshM., and MossF. K.Effects of astigmatism on the visibility of print.American Journal of Ophthalmology, 1943, 26, 155–157.
SewardJ. P.The effect of practice on the visual perception of form.Archives of Psychology, 1931, No. 130.
28.
SibertK. N.Research needs in education from a teacher's viewpoint.Proceedings of the West Coast Regional Conference on Research Related to Blind and Severely Visually Impaired Children, March 8-10. New York: American Foundation for the Blind, 1965.
29.
ThompsonL. R., SchwartzL., IvesJ. E., and BryanN. P.Studies in illumination 1. the hygienic conditions of illumination in certain post offices, especially relating to visual defects and efficiency.Public Health Bulletin No. 40. Washington, D.C.: United States Public Health Service, 1924.
30.
TinkerM. A.Cautions concerning illumination intensities used for reading.American Journal of Optometry, 1935, 12(2), 43–51. (a)
31.
TinkerM. A.Illumination intensities for reading.American Journal for Ophthalmology, 1935, 18(11), 1036–1038. (b)
32.
TinkerM. A.Brightness contrast, illumination intensity and visual efficiency.American Journal of Optometry and Archives of American Academy of Optometry, 1959, 36, 221–236.
33.
TroyT. C.School lighting appraisal and recommendation procedure developed from survey.Transactins of the Illuminating Engineering Society, 1947, 42, 793–802.
34.
van NoordenG. K., and BurianH. M.Visual acuity in normal and amblyopic patients under reduced illumination.AMA Archives of Ophthalmology, 1959, 61, 533–535. (a)
35.
van NoordenG. K., and BurianH. M.Visual acuity in normal and amblyopic patients under reduced illumination.AMA Archives of Ophthalmology, 1959, 62, 396–399. (b)
36.
WestonH. C.Brightness, well-being and work.British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 1944, 1, 180–196.
37.
WhiteL. R., BrittenR. H., IvesJ. E., & ThompsonL. R.Studies in illumination.Public Health Service Bulletin No. 181. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1928.
