Discusses the state of the art in using texture in tactual maps and graphics for visually handicapped persons. Previous studies that have attempted to determine a set of highly discriminable textures are examined in detail. The discrimination of textures occurring within the context of other map symbols is also considered, along with the interference effects of texture on the identification of other classes of map symbols. Finally, suggestions for further research are offered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ArmstrongJ. D.The development of tactual maps for the visually handicapped. In GordonG. (Ed.) Active touch: The mechanisms of recognition of objects by manipulation. A multidisciplinary approach.Oxford, England: Pergamon Press, 1978.
2.
BauerH. J.Discrimination of tactual stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1952, 44, 455–459.
3.
BentzenB. L.Review of The Nature of Maps: Essays Toward Understanding Maps and Mapping by Arthur Robinson and Barbara Bartz.Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 1978, 72(6), 243.
4.
BerláE. P.Behavioral strategies and problems in scanning and interpreting tactual displays.New Outlook for the Blind, October, 1972, 277–286.
5.
BerláE. P.Strategies in scanning a tactual pseudomap.Education of the Visually Handicapped, 1973, 5, 8–19.
6.
BerláE. P., & ButterfieldL. H.Tactual distinctive features analysis: Training blind students in shape recognition and in locating shapes on a map.The Journal of Special Education, 1977, 11(3), 335–346.
7.
BerláE. P., ButterfieldL. H., & MurrM. J.Tactual reading of political maps by blind students: A videomatic behavioral analysis.The Journal of Special Education, 1976, 10, 265–276.
8.
BerláE. P., & MurrM. J.The effects of noise on the location of point symbols and tracking a line on a tactile pseudomap.The Journal of Special Education, 1975, 9(2), 183–190.
9.
BerláE. P., & MurrM. J.Locating symbols on a tactile pseudomap by braille readers operating under different frames of reference. In NolanC. Y. (Ed.) Facilitating the Education of the Visually Handicapped through Research in Communications: Final Report, Part Three, 25-37. Louisville, Ky.: American Printing House for the Blind, 1976.
10.
CashdanS.Visual and haptic form discrimination under conditions of successive stimulation.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968, 76, 221–224.
11.
CulbertS. S., & StellwagenW. T.Tactual discrimination of textures.Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1963, 16, 545–552.
12.
FranksF. L., & NolanC. Y.Development of geographical concepts in blind children.Education of the Visually Handicapped, March, 1970, 1–8.
13.
FranksF. L., & NolanC. Y.Measuring geographical concept attainment in visually handicapped students.Education of the Visually Handicapped, March, 1971, 11–17.
14.
GillJ. M.Design, production and evaluation of tactual maps for the blind. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Engineering, University of Warwick, England, 1973.
15.
GillJ. M.Tactual mapping.AFB Research Bulletin, 1974, 28, 57–80.
16.
HeathW. R.Maps and graphics for the blind: Some aspects of the discriminability of textural surfaces for use in areal differentiation.Dissertation Abstracts International, 1958, 19 (04), 769.
17.
JanssonG.Symbols for tactile maps. In LinqvistB., and Trowald (Eds.) European Conference on Educational Research for the Visually Handicapped.Uppsala, Sweden: Pedagogiska Institutionen, Report No. 31, 1972.
18.
JamesG.A kit for making raised maps.The New Beacon, 1975, 59(696), 85–90.
19.
JamesG. A., & GillJ. M.A pilot study on the discriminability of tactile areal and line symbols for the blind.AFB Research Bulletin, 1975, 29, 23–31.
20.
KatzD.Der Aufbau der Tastwelt (The World of Touch).Leipzig, Germany: Barth, 1925.
21.
KidwellA. M., & GreerP. S.The environmental perceptions of blind persons and their haptic representation.New Outlook for the Blind, 1972, 66(8), 256–276.
22.
LedermanS. J.Tactile roughness of grooved surfaces: The touching process and effects of macro- and microsurface structure.Perception & Psychophysics, 1974, 16(2), 385–395.
23.
LedermanS. J.The “callus-thenics” of touching.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1976, 30(2), 82–89.
24.
LedermanS. J.Auditory texture perception.Perception, in press.
25.
LedermanS. J.Heightening impressions of tactile texture. In GordonG. (Ed.) Active touch: The mechanisms of recognition of objects by manipulation. A multidisciplinary approach.Oxford, England: Pergamon Press, 1978.(a)
26.
LedermanS. J.Tactile texture perception. Address presented to the Lake Ontario Visionary Establishment Conference, Niagara Falls, Canada, 1978.(b)
27.
LedermanS. J., & TaylorM. M.Fingertip force, surface geometry, and the perception of roughness by active touch.Perception & Psychophysics, 1972, 12(5), 401–408.
28.
LobbH.Vision versus touch in form discrimination.Canadian Journal of Psychology, 1965, 19, 175–187.
29.
MorrisJ. E., & NolanC. Y.Discriminability of tactual patterns.International Journal for the Education of the Blind, 1961, 11, 50–54.
30.
MorrisJ. E., & NolanC. Y.Minimum sizes for areal type tactual symbols.International Journal for the Education of the Blind, 1963, 13, 48–51.
31.
NolanC. Y. (Ed.) Facilitating the education of the visually handicapped through research in communications: Final report. Part Three: Facilitating tactile map reading.Louisville, Ky.: American Printing House for the Blind, 1976.
32.
NolanC. Y., & MorrisJ. E.Tactual symbols for the blind: Final report: OVR-RD-587.Louisville, Ky.: American Printing House for the Blind, 1963.
33.
NolanC. Y., & MorrisJ. E.Improvement of tactual symbols for blind children: Final report. (Project No. 5-0421; Grant No. OEG-32-27-0000-1012.) Louisville, Ky.: American Printing House for the Blind, 1971.
34.
OgroskyC. E.New approaches to the preparation and reproduction of tactual and enhanced image graphics for the visually handicapped. M.A. thesis, University of Washington1973.
35.
SchiffW.Raised line drawing research project: Final report.New York: Recording for the Blind, 1966.
36.
SchiffW., & IsikowH.Stimulus redundancy in the tactile perception of histograms.International Journal for the Education of the Blind, 1966, 1–11.
37.
SchiffW., KauferL., & MosakS.Informative tactile stimuli in the perception of direction.Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1966, 23, 1315–1335.
38.
ShermanJ. C.Maps the visually handicapped can “see”—research and experimental progress.Department of Geography, University of Washington, June 1978. Presented at the Third Annual Meeting of the Canadian Cartographic Association.
39.
StellwagenW. T., & CulbertS. S.Comparison of blind and sighted subjects in the discrimination of texture.Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1963, 17, 61–62.
40.
StevensS. S., & HarrisJ. R.The scaling of subjective roughness and smoothness.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962, 64(5), 489–494.
41.
TaylorM. M., & LedermanS. J.Tactile roughness of grooved surfaces: A model and the effect of friction.Perception & Psychophysics, 1975, 17(1), 23–36.
42.
TaylorM. M., LedermanS. J., & GibsonR. H.Tactual perception of texture. In Handbook of Perception, Vol. III, 1973, 251–272.
43.
WiedelJ. W., & GrovesP. A.Tactual mapping: Design, reproduction, reading and interpretation.University of Maryland, Occasional Papers in Geography, No. 2, 1972.
