The rationale for a comprehensive program in visual functioning is based upon an assumed interaction between: (a) functions performed by the visual system, (b) developmental visual tasks organized in keeping with perceptual/cognitive milestones, and (c) a variety of indoor and outdoor environments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AshcroftS. C., HallidayC., & BarragaN.Study II: Effects of experimental teaching on the visual behavior of children educated as though they had no vision.Nashville, TN.: George Peabody College for Teachers, 1965 (Office of Education Grant No. 32-52-01021-1034).
2.
BarragaN.Increased visual behavior in low vision children.New York: American Foundation for the Blind, 1964.
3.
BarragaN. C., CollinsM., & HollisJ.Development of efficiency in visual functioning: A literature analysis.Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 1977, 71, 387–91.
4.
GibsonE. J.Principles of perceptual learning and development.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1969.
5.
HolmesR. B.Training residual vision in adolescents educated previously as non-visual. Unpublished master's thesis, Illinois State University1967.
6.
O'BrienR. (Ed.) Vision stimulation.Rockville, Md.: Montgomery County Public Schools, Bulletin 227, 1971.
7.
SeidenbergB. H.Pediatric low vision. In FayeE. E., & HoodC. M. (Eds.) Low vision.Springfield, IL.: Thomas, 1975.
8.
UzgirisI., & HuntJ. McB.Assessment in infancy: Ordinal scales of psychological development.Urbana, IL.: University of Illinois Press, 1975.
