BerlaE.P.Behavioral strategies and problems in scanning and interpreting tactual displays. NewOutlook for the Blind, 1972, 66(8), 277–286.
2.
BerlaE.P., & ButterfieldL.H.Tactile political maps: Two experimental designs.Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 1977, 71(6), 262–264.
3.
BerlaE.P., & NolanC.Y.Tactual maps: A problem analysis. Proceedings of the ICEBY, Madrid, 1972.
4.
FranksF.L., & NolanC.Y.Development of geographical concepts in blind children.Education of the Visually Handicapped, 1970, 2, 1–8.
5.
FranksF.L., & NolanC.Y.Measuring geographical concept attainment in visually handicapped students.Education of the Visually Handicapped, 1971, 3, 11–17.
6.
GillJ.M., & JamesG.A.A study on the discriminability of tactual point symbols.AFB Research Bulletin, 1973, 26, 19–34.
7.
GillJ.M.Design, Production and Evaluation of Tactual Maps for the Blind. Ph.D. thesis, University of Warwick1973. [Gives additional technical information, and listings of the FORTRAN IV software used in the prototype system.] This is available from the University of Warwick in the U.K. and from the AFB Library, New York.
8.
JamesG.A., & ArmstrongJ.D.Handbook on Mobility Maps.Nottingham, England: Blind Mobility Research Unit, Mobility Monograph No. 2, 1976.
9.
PyraS.Effectiveness of embossed drawings in teaching biology.Dept. of Special Education, University of Warsaw. (In preparation, 1977.)
10.
SchiffW., KauferL., & MosakS.Informative tactile stimuli in the perception of direction.Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1966, 23(Monograph Supplement 7).
