Examines the behavior performance of blind persons in view of the role expectations of significant others. The findings suggest that there is a correlation between the expectations of significant others and the “blind role” assumed by blind persons. However, it was also found that in many circumstances blind persons act in accordance with accepted social norms due to broader societal conditioning or because of their own self-expectations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdlerL. M.Patients of a state mental hospital: The outcome of their hospitalization. In RoseA. (Ed.), Mental Health and Mental Disorder, New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 1955.
BaumanM. K., and YoderN.M.Adjustment to blindness—reviewed.Springfield, Ill.: Charles C Thomas, 1966.
4.
BiddleB. J., and ThomasE. J. (Eds.) Role theory: Concepts and research.New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1967.
5.
ChevignyH.My eyes have a cold nose.New Haven: Yale University Press, 1946.
6.
DeGraziaS.The use of time. In KleemeierR. W., Aging and Leisure.New York: Oxford University Press, 1961.
7.
DinitzInstrumental role expectations and posthospital performance of female mental patients.Social Forces, 1962, 40, 248–254.
8.
EriksonK. T.Patient role and social uncertainty. In RubingtonE., WeinbergM. S. (Eds.), Deviance: The Interactionist Perspective, New York: Macmillan Company, 1973.
9.
FreedmanJ. L., and DobbA. N.Deviancy: The psychology of being different.New York: Academic Press, 1968.
10.
GoffmanE.Behavior in public press.New York: The Free Press, 1963.
11.
GoffmanE.Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1963.
12.
GoldbergN. H., and SwintonJ. R. (Eds.) Blindness research: The expanding frontiers.University Park Pennsylvania: The Penn State University Press, 1969.
13.
KlappO. E.Dynamics of self-typing. In RubingtonE., WeinbergM. S. (Eds.), Deviance: The Interactionist Perspective, New York: Macmillan Company, 1973.
14.
LemertE. M.Social structure, social control and deviation. In ClinardM. D. (Ed.), Anomie and Deviant Behavior.Glencoe, New York: The Free Press, 1964.
15.
LeznoffM., and WestleyW. A.The homosexual community. In DinitzS., (Eds.), Deviance: Studies in the Process of Stigmatization and Societal Reaction.New York: Oxford University Press, 1969.
16.
LorberJ.Deviance as performance: The case of illness.Social Problems, 1967, 14, 302–310.
17.
LowenfeldB.Psychological problems of children with impaired vision. In CruizkshankW. M., JohnsonG. E., (Eds.), Psychology of Exceptional Children and Youth.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1963.
18.
MayadasN. S.Houseparents’ expectations: A crucial variable in the performance of blind institutionalized children.New Outlook for the Blind, 69, 77–85.
19.
MayadasN. S.Role expectations and performance of blind children: Practice and implications.Education of the Visually Handicapped., 1972, 4, 45–52.
20.
MacFarlandD.Social isolation of the blind: An underrated aspect of disability and dependency.New Outlook for the Blind, 1960, 318–319.
21.
MeadG. H.Mind, self and society.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934.
22.
SchettM. J.The role of the mentally ill and the dynamics of mental disorder: A research framework. In Dinitz, (Eds.), Deviance: Studies in the Process of Stigmatization and Societal Reaction, New York: Oxford University Press, 1969.
23.
ScottR. A.The making of blind men.New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1969.
24.
SullivanH. S.Theory of interpersonal relations. In FordD. H., UrbanH. B., (Eds.), Systems of Psychotherapy.New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1963.
25.
ThibautJ. W., and KellyH. H.The social psychology of groups.New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1959.
26.
ThomasE. J.Problems of disability from the perspective of role theory.Journal of Health and Human Behavior, 1966, 7, 2–13.
