A detailed discussion of the visual mechanisms found in the higher vertebrates is used as the basis for exploring the problems found in creating visual substitution systems. Specific attention is given to the control mechanisms used in the visual system and to the processing of visual information in the retina and brain. The three types of substitution systems discussed are tactual display systems, audio display systems, and those involving direct stimulation of the brain using electrodes.
Bach-y-RitaP.Neurophysiological basis of a tactile vision-substitution system.IEEE Transactions. Man-Machine Systems, 1970(March), MMS-11, 108–110.
3.
Bach-y-RitaP., CollinsC. C., SaundersF. A., WhiteB., and ScaddenL.Vision substitution by tactile image projection.Nature, 1969, 221, 963–964.
4.
Bach-y-RitaP., CollinsC. C., ScaddenL. A., HolmlundG. W., and HartB. K.Display techniques in a tactile vision substitution system.Medical and Biological Illustration, 1970, 20, 6–12.
5.
BeckerR. O.Stimulation of partial limb regeneration in rats.Nature, 1972, 235(No. 5333), 109–111.
6.
BeckerR. O.Electromagnetic forces and life processes.Technology Review, 1967, 75(No. 2), 2–8.
CollinsC. C.A portable seeing aid prototype.Journal of Biomedical Systems, 1971, 2, 3–9.(a)
12.
CollinsC. C.Tactile vision synthesis. In SterlingT. D., BeringE. A.Jr., PollackS. V., VaughanH. G.Jr., (Eds.), Visual prosthesis, the interdisciplinary dialogue.New York: Academic Press, 1971. (b)
13.
CollinsC. C., and MadeyJ. M.Electrocutaneous visual prosthesis.24th ACEMB, 1971, 174.
14.
CollinsC. C., and SaundersF. A.Tactile television: Electrocutaneous perception of pictorial images.Abstracts of the Neuroelectric Conference, 1969, 5, 55–64.
15.
FenderD. H.Control mechanisms of the eye.Scientific American, 1964, 211(1), 24–33.
16.
FishR. M.An auditory display capable of presenting two-dimensional shapes to the blind.American Foundation for the Blind Research Bulletin, 1973, 26, 5–18.
17.
FuchsA. F., and RonS.An analysis of rapid eye movements of sleep in the monkey.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1968, 25, 244–251.
18.
HaberRalph N.How we remember what we see.Scientific American, 1970, 222(5), 104–112.
19.
HessE. H.Attitude and pupil size.Scientific American, 1965, 208(4), 46–54.
20.
HubelD. H., and WieselT. N.Receptive fields of cells in striate cortex of very young, visually inexperienced kittens.Journal of Physiology, 1963, 191, 994–1002.
21.
JacobsonM., and HuntR. K.The origins of nerve-cell specificity.Scientific American, 1973, 228(2), 26–35.
22.
JohnsonP. C.The eye. In SelkurtE. E. (Ed.), Physiology.Boston: Little, Brown, 1966.
23.
LettvinJ. Y., MaturanaH. R., McCullockW. S., and PittsW. H.What the frog's eye tells the frog's brain.Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers, 1959, 47, 1940–1951.
24.
MichaelC. R.Retinal processing of visual images.Scientific American, 1969, 220(5), 104–114.
25.
NewellF. W., and ErnestJ. T.Ophthalmology: Principles and concepts.St. Louis: C. V. Mosby, 1974.
26.
NotonD., and StarkL.Eye movements and visual perception.Scientific American, 1971, 224(6), 34–43.
27.
PottsA. M., HodgesD., ShelmanC. B., FritzK. J., LevyN. S., and MangnallY.Morphology of the primate optic nerve.Investigative Ophthalmology, 1972, 11, 980–1016.
28.
RobinsonD. A.The mechanisms of human smooth pursuit eye movement.Journal of Physiology, 1965, 180, 569–591.
29.
RuchR. C., and FultonJ. F.Medical physiology and biophysics.New York: W. B. Saunders, 1960.
30.
ScaddenL.A tactual substitute for sight.New Scientist, 1969, 41, 677–678.
31.
SterlingT. D., and VaughanH. G.Jr., An overview: What makes a visual prosthesis possible. In SterlingT. D., BeringE. A.Jr., PollackS. V., VaughanH. G.Jr., (Eds.), Visual prosthesis, the interdisciplinary dialogue.New York: Academic Press, 1971.
32.
StoneL. S.Regeneration of the retina, iris, and lens. In ThorntonC. S. (Ed.), Regeneration in vertebrates.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1959.
33.
ThomasE. L.Movements of the eye.Scientific American, 1968, 219(2), 88–95.
34.
ThompsonR. F.Foundations of physiological psychology.New York: Harper and Row, 1967.
35.
VaughanH. G.Jr., & SchimmelH.Feasibility of electrocortical visual prosthesis. In SterlingT. D., BeringE. A.Jr., PollackS. V., VaughanH. G.Jr., (Eds.), Visual prosthesis, the interdisciplinary dialogue.New York: Academic Press, 1971.
36.
WhiteB. W., SaundersF. A., ScaddenL., Bach-y-RitaP., and CollinsC. C.Seeing with the skin.Perception and Psychophysics, 1970, 7, 23–27.
