Introduction: Research is beginning to support the association between positive disability identity and well-being among individuals with disabilities, including those with visual impairments (i.e., blindness and low vision). To enhance practitioner understanding of how to support individuals with visual impairments, research is needed to examine how disability identity attitudes may vary based on disability characteristics in this population. Methods: Using multiple linear regression, the author examined the association between impairment-related factors and personal disability identity (PDI; i.e., disability affirmation and disability acceptance) and group disability identity (GDI) in a sample of 212 adult U.S. residents with visual impairments. Results: Results of this study indicated that participants who use a mobility tool (cane, dog guide, or both) have higher self-reported disability affirmation (p = .001)—an identity construct related to feelings of disability pride versus shame—after controlling for age, gender, and impairment-related factors (e.g., severity indicators). The Cohen’s f2 value for the affirmation model was .15, a medium effect size (Cohen, 1988). The regression on GDI indicated that younger participants, in general, reported higher feelings of connection to the disability community (i.e., higher GDI; p = .001); Cohen’s f2 was .13, a small effect. The regression on disability acceptance yielded non-significant findings. Discussion: Researchers and practitioners working with adults who have visual impairments should consider the relationship between an individual’s disability affirmation and decision-making regarding mobility tool use and training. Future research should also examine hypotheses regarding the negative association between age and GDI among adults with visual impairments. Implications for practitioners: Practitioners within the field of visual impairment may benefit from a consideration of consumer disability identity, including disability affirmation and disability group affiliation.
BogartK. R. (2014). The role of disability self-concept in adaptation to congenital or acquired disability. Rehabilitation Psychology, 59, 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035800
2.
BogartK. R. (2015). Disability identity predicts lower anxiety and depression in multiple sclerosis. Rehabilitation Psychology, 60, 105–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000029
3.
BogartK. R.LundE. M.RottensteinA. (2018). Disability pride protects self-esteem through the rejection-identification model. Rehabilitation Psychology, 63, 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000166
4.
BogartK. R.RottensteinA.LundE. M.BouchardL. (2017). Who identifies as disabled? An examination of impairment and contextual factors. Rehabilitation Psychology, 62, 553–562.
5.
CameronC. (2011). Disability arts: From the social model to the affirmative model. Parallel Lines, 1(1).
6.
CohenJ. E. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7.
DarlingR. B.HeckertD. A. (2010). Orientations toward disability: Differences over the lifecourse. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 57, 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10349121003750489
8.
DunnD. S. (2015). The social psychology of disability. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9.
Forber-PrattA. J.LyewD. A.MuellerC.SamplesL. B. (2017). Disability identity development: A systematic review of the literature. Rehabilitation Psychology, 62, 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000134
10.
HahnH. D.BeltT. L. (2004). Disability identity and attitudes toward cure in a sample of disabled activists. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45, 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/002214650404 500407
11.
HayeemsR. Z.GellerG.FinkelsteinD.FadenR. R. (2005). How patients experience progressive loss of visual function: A model of adjustment using qualitative methods. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 89(5), 615–620.
12.
HoganC. L. (2012). Stigma, Embarrassment and the Use of Mobility Aids. International Journal of Orientation & Mobility, 5(1), 49–52.
13.
KinneyW. B.CoyleC. P. (1992). Predicting life satisfaction among adults with physical disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 73, 863–869.
14.
LaneD. R.McNicholasJ.CollisG. M. (1998). Dogs for the disabled: Benefits to recipients and welfare of the dog. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 59, 49–60.
15.
MagasiS.WongA.GrayD. B.HammelJ.BaumC.WangC. C.HeinemannA. W. (2015). Theoretical foundations for the measurement of environmental factors and their impact on participation among people with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96(4), 569–577.
16.
McAlpineL.MooreC. (1995). Developing social understanding in children with a visual impairment. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 89, 349–358.
17.
McCormackC.CollinsB. (2010). Can disability studies contribute to client-centered occupational therapy practice?British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73(7), 339–342.
18.
Nario-RedmondM. R.NoelJ. G.FernE. (2013). Redefining disability, re-imaging the self: Disability identification predicts self-esteem and strategic responses to stigma. Self and Identity, 12, 468–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2012.681118
OlkinR. (2002). Could you hold the door for me? Including disability in diversity. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 8, 130. https://doi.org/10.1037/1099-9809.8.2.130
21.
OlkinR. (2017). Disability-affirmative therapy: A case formulation template for clients with disabilities. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
22.
OysermanD.ElmoreK.SmithG. (2012). Self, self-concept, and identity. Handbook of self and identity, 2, 69–104.
23.
RhodesP. J.SmallN. A.IsmailH.WrightJ. P. (2008). ‘What really annoys me is people take it like it’s a disability’, epilepsy, disability and identity among people of Pakistani origin living in the UK. Ethnicity & Health, 13, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557850701803031
24.
SeyboldD. (2005, September). The psychosocial impact of acquired vision loss—particularly related to rehabilitation involving orientation and mobility. In International congress series (Vol. 1282, pp. 298–301). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ics.2005.05.008
WainapelS. F. (1989). Attitudes of visually impaired persons toward cane use. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 83(9), 446–448.
28.
ZapataM. A. (2018). Personal disability identity in retinitis pigmentosa. Rehabilitation Psychology, 63, 512–520. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000238
29.
ZapataM. A. (2019). Personal disability identity measurement: Self-worth and personal meaning (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). ProQuest ID: Zapata_berkeley_0028E_19275. Merritt ID: ark:/13030/m5t20b0n. Retrieved fromhttps://escholarship.org/uc/item/1s79b3gt
30.
ZapataM. A. (2020a). Disability affirmation and acceptance predict hope among adults with physical disabilities. Rehabilitation Psychology, 65(3), 291–298. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000364
31.
ZapataM. A. (2020b). Disability affirmation predicts employment among adults with visual impairment and blindness. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034355220957107
