BealC. R.RosenblumL. P. (2018). Evaluation of the effectiveness of a tablet computer application (app) in helping students with visual impairments solve mathematics problems. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 112(1), 5–19.
MazellaA.AlbaretJ.PicardD. (2014). Haptic tests for use with children and adults with visual impairment: A literature review. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 108, 227–237.
7.
MorashV.McKerracherA. (2014). The relationship between tactile graphics and mathematics for students with visual impairments. Terra Haptica, 4, 1–10.
8.
PanayiotouA.KyriakidesL.CreemersB. M.McMahonL.VanlaarG.PfeiferM.RekalidouG.BrenM. (2014). Teacher behavior and student outcomes: Results of a European study. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(1), 73–93.
9.
RothbergM.GouldB. (2010). “Effective practices for description of science content within digital talking books.” Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Technology & Persons With Disabilities Conference, 22–27 March 2010. San Diego, CA: CSUN.
10.
ŞahinA. (2015). The effects of quantity and quality of teachers’ probing and guiding questions on student performance. Sakarya University Journal of Science, 19(1), 95–113.
11.
Wall EmersonR.AndersonD. (2018a). Using description to convey mathematics content in visual images to students who are visually impaired. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 112(2), 157–168.
12.
Wall EmersonR.AndersonD. (2018b). What mathematical images are in a typical mathematics textbook: Implications for students with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 112(1), 20–32.
13.
ZebehazyK. T.WiltonA. P. (2014a). Charting success: The experience of teachers of students with visual impairments in promoting graphic use by students. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 108, 263–274.
14.
ZebehazyK. T.WiltonA. P. (2014b). Straight from the source: Perceptions of students with visual impairments about graphics use. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 108, 275–286.