The results of this survey of attitudes toward visually impaired persons among the general public and rehabilitation workers in The Netherlands suggest that it is useful and possible to distinguish between the emotional and cognitive components of attitudes. Implications for public education programs and for training programs for professionals are presented.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AltmanB.M. (1981). Studies of attitudes toward the handicapped: The need for a new direction. Social Problems, 28, 321-337.
2.
&McGrawAugusto C.R., J.M. (1990). Humanizing blindness through public educa-tion. Journal of Visual Impairment &Blindness, 84, 397-400.
3.
BarragaN.C. (1989). Perspectives on working with visually impaired persons worldwide: Looking forward. Journal of Visual Impairment &Blindness, 83, 84—87.
4.
BinaM.J. (1986). Social skill development through cooperative group learning strategies. Education of the Visually Handicapped, 18, 2740.
5.
BinaM.J. (1987). The impact of change on professionals in the field of blindness. Journal of Visual Impairment &Blindness, 81, 382-388.
6.
BinaM.J. (1991). Overcoming current obstacles to our hopes for the future: Lessons from our pioneer ancestors. Journal of Visual Impairment &Blindness, 85,4-11.
7.
&WigginsBreckler S.J., E.C. (1989). Affect versus evaluation in the structure of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 253-271.
8.
&BudoffConant S., M. (1982). The develop-ment of sighted people’s understanding of blindness. Journal of Visual Impairment &Blindness, 76, 86-90.
9.
CowenE.L.UnderbergR.P.&VerrilloR.T. (1958). The development and testing of an attitude to blindness scale. Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 297-304.
10.
DixonJ.M. (1983). Attitudinal barriers and strategies for overcoming them. Journal of Visual Impairment &Blindness, 77, 290-292.
11.
&AjzenFishbein M., I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory' and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
12.
GrayJ. A. (1987). The psychology of fear and stress (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
13.
HeinemannW.. (1990). Meeting the handi-capped: A case of affective-cognitive incon-sistency. In W. Stroebe &M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 1), (pp. 323-338). Chichester, England: John Wiley &Sons.
14.
LangerE.J.FiskeS.TaylorS.E.&ChanowitzB. (1976). Stigma, staring, and discomfort: A novel-stimulus hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12,451463.
15.
MakasE.Finnerty-FriedP.SigafoosA.ReissD.(1988). The Issues in Disability Scale: A new cognitive and affective measure of attitudes toward people with physical disabilities. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, 19, 21-29.
MatthewsV.WestieC.(1966). Preferred method for obtaining rankings: Reactions to physical handicaps. American Sociological Review, 31,851-854.
18.
McKayCourington. S.LambertR.W.JrBeckerS.LudlowL.H.WrightB.(1983). The measurement of attitudes toward blindness and its importance for rehabilita-tion. International Journal for Rehabilitation Research, 6, 67-72.
19.
OzojiE.D. (1992). The need to change public attitudes in Nigeria toward people who are blind. Journal of Visual Impairment &Blindness, 86, 443-446.
20.
PratkanisA.R.BrecklerS.J.&GreenwaldA.G. (1989). Attitude structure and function. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21.
SchererK.R. (1986). Vocal affect expression: A review and a model for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 143-165.
22.
&LukoffWhiteman M., I.F. (1964a). Attitudes toward blindness in two college groups. Journal of Social Psychology, 63, 179-191.
23.
&LukoffWhiteman M., I.F. (1964b). A facto-rial study of sighted people’s attitude toward blindness. Journal of Social Psychology, 64, 339-353.
24.
&LukoffWhiteman M., I.F. (1965). Attitudes toward blindness and other physical handi-caps. Journal of Social Psychology, 66, 135-145.
25.
ZajoncR.B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151-175.
